From Clarence Land, on Tue, 28 May 1996 22:39:09 GMT (in response to: Agreement)
Dear Kelly,
Protesting the war in Vietnam was probably a very fine thing and I would encourage you to protest any political action you government might undertake that you are opposed to. I do not, however, believe that the protest against the American involve- ment in Vietnam was about the concern for the safety and return of our troops. It was to the best of my understanding about, don't send me or my boyfriend to Vietnam. Had there been genuine concern for the troops in the field there would have been less hate shown to them by the protesters. The men who fought in Vietnam were just trying to do the job their country asked them to do. That the war turned sour is by no means their fault unless you wish to say the inability to win the war was because the troops were no damn good, and therefore, the reason for the lack of a speedy conclusion. The protesters' ability to end the war was about as successful as the troops' ability to win the war. The protest went on from 1965 to 1972 and may have stopped the war but not quick enough to save many lives. The protests did give hope to the enemy in Vietnam that all they had to do was wait and what they wanted would be theirs but maybe more importantly the protesters did considerable damage to the moral of the troops. It is hard to fight for a cause that divides the nation so bitterly, and especially so, when you know you will be ridiculed when you get home.
Vietnam Interactive Portfolio, permanent message archive. Copyright© E. Kenneth Hoffman, 1995-2005