From Some kind of hippie freak, or a Martian, or something......, on Tue, 15 Apr 1997 21:24:12 GMT (in response to: Clarification of above)
Regarding the above-mentioned whatever-it-is, I am quite of the suspicion that there lurked here in the USA a strong undercurrent of definite war support that included major war effort approval INCLUDING BIG ESCALATION! if need be, and that there was a major drift towards getting it over with by way of MAJOR POUNDING OF THE(so-called)ENEMY!!!! Ah, but that sort of method was potentially the road to GIGANTIC DISASTER, and merely pulling out and later saying bye-bye to SVN GOV was a 'little problem' compared to the GIGANTIC PROBLEM of possible mega-war, or at least the huge eruption of anti-war violence that would have been inexorable if the war was escalated via an all-out conventional effort with big mobilization. The only way to get away with a really BIG mobilization was early on, and yet for what? -Pearl Harbor was one thing, the invasion of France in '40 was another (and earlier) thing; and the supposed shooting at US ships by NVN attack boats was another and ever so much smaller thing altogether>(even the crossing of ROK border by NK in '50 in big attack sweep was not met by all out mobilization). HOW COULD USA GET AWAY WITH AN ALL OUT MOBILIZATION IN VIETNAM? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? So, there was pressure to ensure the war was not over escalated or dragged on forever. There was no other option. Nixon saved the day.... signed x hippie freak
Vietnam Interactive Portfolio, permanent message archive. Copyright© E. Kenneth Hoffman, 1995-2005