peerevaluation2 

Short Version F19

 

 

 

 

 

 

click to go to F'20 version:  2625 Capstone Campaign / Team Project-MINI VERSION {MAJOR PRESENTATION #5}

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  last updated 11/17/20

 

2625 Capstone Campaign /Team ProjectMINI-virtual-VERSION {MAJOR PRESENTATION #5}

F'20

Recording/Submission-Upload Location Details:

HOW TO RECORD YOUR TEAM PRESENTATION:  two multiple camera recording options:
1 - via the Microsoft Stream function in MS Teams. Upload finalized video to Launchpad.{into  "Video Assessment - Grp Competitive Campaign Presentations"}

2- via the multiple camera Video Assessment function directly in Launchpad. {into  "Video Assessment - Grp Competitive Campaign Presentations"}

Both options require one person to serve as the "meeting convener/organizer." That person starts the meeting & recording & admits the other team members.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

   HOW TO SUBMIT YOUR TEAM PRESENTATION: Video record via LaunchPad – as was done for the F20 Selective1 presentations. You can record directly into LaunchPad or can prerecord & upload it there.  

 You can record it directly into  the LaunchPad  app or , if you created  a separate videofile of your Presentation ( e,g, via MS Teams) , you can upload that into the same spot.

Note: The Final Template page needs to be submitted in its own slot.

Note: Any slide decks will already be integrated into the video presentation so separate upload is not necessary.

Note:  If you know how & someone has a double monitor set up, you can even try showing the slides as a minimized screen. IN ORDER TO GRADE ACCURATELY, It's most important that the presenters be clearly seen & heard.


RATIONALE & GOALS & TIMELINE:

PRESENTATION DEADLINES: Upload  /  Peer Evaluation Form 2[assignments indicated below will be a question on the written Final]

PRESENTATION COMPONENTS & STRUCTURE:

LENGTH OF PRESENTATION:

TOPICS GUIDELINES:

THIS SEMESTER'S TEAMS:

PEER EVALUATION FORM 2a

SUBMISSIONS: Preliminary Planner [SHORT VERSION]  // Final Presentation Agenda [ SHORT VERSION] {due day of upload.} ]


LIST OF GRADING RUBRICS:  for presenters      /     for questioners



*Video uploads due in LaunchPad - no later than Weds 12/2 - 11:59
*Presenters' individual grades will = 50% of the Final exam grade
*Assigned presentation peer critiques  will = one question on the final written portion of the Final Exam *

(Amazon Team)  each person completes  PEER EVALUATION-2a  on NFL Presentation [submit as Question 1 on Final Exam ]

 (NFL Team) each person completes PEER EVALUATION-2a  on TESLA  Presentation [ submit as Question 1 on Final Exam ]

 (Tesla Team ) each person:PEER EVALUATION 2a on  AMAZON Presentation   [ submit as Question 1 on Final Exam ] 





Project Timelime Summary:
  PROJECT ACTION STEPS  GMAP session in-class
 {Groups Meet And Plan}  [10-20 minutes]
if not listed below,  group planning is done outside of class session time		  
W-11/4 in class, Professor announces "mergers"; distribution of Contracts [ deadline for advance email requests = 11/2] yes> GMAP  
M-11/9 n.l.t. by email, teams submit decision on Company selection
[Teams meet outside of class (virtually ) ]		   deliverable 1: Company Choices
W-11/11 [Teams meet outside of class (virtually ) ]    
M-11/16 during class, super-GMAP session / submit  preliminary preparation sheets {SHORT VERSION} yes> GMAP deliverable 2: Prelim. Planner
W-11/18 [Teams meet outside of class (virtually ) ]
Professor begins returning preliminary feedback		 Tentative> mini-GMAP  
M-11/23 in class,  finalize all submission details
[Teams meet outside of class (virtually ) ]		 Tentative> mini-GMAP  
11/30-12/2
remote week		 [Teams meet outside of class (virtually ) ] yes> GMAP (class is asynchronous)  
W-12/2
remote week		 Deadline for uploading Capstone Campaign video yes> GMAP (class is asynchronous) deliverables 3 & 4: Video upload & Final Agenda
12/3-12/7 View assigned Peer Videos in TBD.  Be Prepared to complete the "Peer Evaluation Form 2a" to be pasted into online final exam ---------  
[exam session]
M-12/7@ 2:30-4:30 		written portion of Final --------- deliverable 5:  Copy & paste your completed Peer Evaluation Form 2a into the Final Exam




RATIONALE & GOALS

 

As you recall,  in the beginning of the semester, your level of communication skill was assessed by using  a complex oral activity as a

PRE-TEST: The Special Occasion unit. Similarly, this current oral project is complex, multi-faceted and will be used as a pragmatic 

"POST-TEST" to assess how far you have come in terms of:

> making content audience-centered,

> using strategic organization,

> having effective delivery techniques (both vocal & physical)

> handling critique & question/answer

 

 

 For F20 , 50% of the grade for the Final Exam category will come from this team project [ see below for grading rubrics for group grade & individuals' grades.  The other 50% will come from a brief, written, "short answer" test will be used to assess how much you have learned & UNDERSTAND about the material in the textbook [submission via Blackboard]. )






PRESENTATION COMPONENTS & STRUCTURES: step-by-step

It all starts with the partnerships & selected companies used in the WebCam Presentation project.

1. Each WebCam partnership will  merge with another partnership for collaboration on creating this campaign. 

-This will result in a total of 3 groups -- each consisting of consisting of 6 members.

-Consider various criteria for selecting your match ups (mutual compatibility, negotiation, similarity of Webcam topics, etc.) 

-As before, if  necessary, your Professor will intervene to form and/or rearrange group memberships. finalized no later than 11/4




2. Each newly formed team/group will select ONE of their already-analyzed companies.

-It doesn't matter which, but you may want to base your selection on which one  is a better fit for this new task: pitching a new spokesperson.

 

3.  Imagine your group is a marketing team with the task of  selecting a public figure to serve as the spokesperson for the company  you selected in step 2. 

-This person will be the "face" of your selected company--on television commercials, print advertisements, and online promotions .

- Using Dewey’s Reflective Thinking Process {explained in your textbook} , STRATEGIZE & SELECT a celebrity by following this sequence:

     > FIRST consider what kind of image you want the product/company/initiative to portray. 

     > THEN, brainstorm,   which "celebrity" possesses appropriate credibility and can create the desired image and convey the right message to your audience.  

     > THEN analyze the LOGOS/ETHOS/ PATHOS this selected personality will lend to your company. Your eventual  presentation will be an argument of how your final choice as spokesperson will satisfy the company's needs (Pull out that 2 sided, "Motivated Sequence" worksheet. to be linked to the course calendar . In the meantime, use the version in your textbook/LaunchPad.  You'll need it!!!)




4. As a group, plan a presentational campaign in which you will "pitch" your selected celebrity via a 10 minute persuasive presentation.

-The presentation should clearly apply  Monroe’s Motivated Sequence as well as the guidelines  for persuasive speaking as outlined in the chapter.

- Grading points are allotted based on how effectively & explicitly the persuasion techniques are applied to the team's argument.

- In other words, your team will prepare & deliver a persuasive presentation to an audience of (hypothetical) decision makers.

 

5.   F'20 alternate peer review procedure:  Each individual in each "mega-team" will be assigned to view & evaluate another group's campaign video. Below is a shortened  version of the  Peer Evaluation Form 2a  . View the other Team's video ( accessible in LaunchPad via same "Video Assessment" slot you used for your upload. -You can think of the listeners' role as being similar to the "Sharks" we viewed.

 Fill in the form. Don't forget the "Challenge" question that you would have asked if these had been done live. This question is NOT meant to ask for investment-potential information  but rather will ask for clarification or for challenging the viability of the Team's proposal.  In other words, questioners will apply CRITICAL LISTENING &  COMPREHENSIVE LISTENING in reference to the  presentation's Ethos/Logos/Pathos.

 If you want,  you also can notate  whether you would  accept the proposed spokesperson and "green light" the team's proposal (i.e. implement their plan).



PRESENTATION LENGTH

_ 10-12 minutes Full Team Presentation 

 

TOPIC GUIDELINES (summary):

Your group has been given the responsibility of selecting a notable  personality  to serve as the spokesperson for the company  you selected in step 2 above.  This person will be the "face" of your company-- including television commercials, print advertisements, and online promotions. Using Dewey’s reflective thinking process [see textbook] , choose an appropriate  celebrity/public figure. While making your decision, consider what kind of image you want the product/or/company  to portray. Which celebrity possesses appropriate credibility and can create the desired image and convey the right message to your audience?

NB: You can expect questions about your experiences with "Dewey" on the upcoming test & quizzes.

 


WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS:

F'20 Mini/SHORT VERSION Preliminary Planner Template [click for copy of form] Complete & email no later than 11/16-11:59pm 

 

AND

F'20 Mini/SHORT VERSION FINAL Submission Template-   is required & due the day of video upload. Submission location in LaunchPad drop box slot




------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


GRADING RUBRICS:



for presenters -

For Group    
up to _80_points    points awarded 
  -Motivated Sequence Competence {other appropriate patterns accepted}  
  -ETHOS-LOGOS-PATHOS {applied as target audience strategies }  
  - Argumentation underlying Spokesperson choice {emphasis: reasoning & warrant}  
     
   -Presentational Clarity & Organization  
     
  -Evidence of Preparation & Practice  
     
  -Appropriate Choices & Usage of Presentation Aids  
     
  - Well handled Question & Answer segment  
     
  -All members participated cohesively ( team effort)  
     
  -Submission of Presentation Plan/Agenda with BIBLIOGRAPHY    pass / f ail
                                                                                                     Group Total      _________
     
For Individuals    
up to 20 points

_____well prepared   /  ____vocal delivery effectiveness   /  ____ physical delivery skills  /   ______ extemporaneous engagement with listeners

 
                                                                                    Individual Total     ____________
     
                                                                                    GRAND TOTAL     ________




===========================================================================



 Peer Evaluation Form2a > Capstone Campaign Presentations - utilize p. 60/1 guidelines -

 Each person completes this peer evaluation process separately. Notate your evaluation of the group's presentation [assignments listed below]. Your assessment should be honest and constructive, providing the sort of feedback that you would find helpful if you were the presenter. Your  professor will use your feedback to "evaluate you as an evaluator"  & you will receive 0 to 10 points for this question in the final exam.

         

 Also, these questions will help focus your listening in order to construct your "psuedo-Shark"

  question at the bottom.  [USE THIS TEMPLATE TO COMPLETE EVALUATION & PASTE IT INTO FINAL EXAM QUESTION SLOT]  Click here for additional guidelines on the F20 evaluation process.

 

1. As a whole, did the presenters seem poised & prepared?                     Yes   /   Somewhat   /   No

Comments/Suggestions: 

 

                      ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 

2. Did the presenters use appropriate volume & vocal expression?           Yes   /   Somewhat   /   No    

Comments/Suggestions: 

 

                      ----------------------------------------------------------------------  

 

3. Did the presenters use extemporaneous delivery                                  Yes   /   Somewhat   /   No

(incl. eye contact, gestures, facial expression, talked TO not "at", etc)?         

Comments/Suggestions: 

 

                      ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 

4. Was the presentation's  introduction effective?                                    Yes   /   Somewhat   /    No 

Comments/Suggestions: 

 

                      ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 

5. Was the presentation's conclusion effective?                                        Yes   /   Somewhat   /   No

Comments/Suggestions: 

 

                      ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 

6.[Compr.Listn] Identify at least three(3) of the group’s main persuasive points.  

Comments:

 

                      ----------------------------------------------------------------------

7.[Compr.Listn] Did the presentation make use of the Motivated Sequence? & How could you tell?

Comments: 

 

                      ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 

8.[Critical.Listn] Did the presentation draw clear connections between their CLAIM > to their EVIDENCE > to their WARRANT?  Explain                                       Yes   /   Somewhat   /   No

Comments: 

                      ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 


9.[Critical.Listn] Do you support the group's  proposed company spokesperson?  Yes / Somewhat  / No

Comments/Suggestions: 

 

                      ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 

10. The best thing about this campaign presentation was____________________: 

                      ----------------------------------------------------------------------  
> USE THIS SPACE TO WRITE OUT YOUR "Challenge Question" {i.e., if you had heard this presentation live, what Shark Tank kind of question would you have asked them?

 
 
 
 

===========================================================================

 

F'20 TEAMS

AA1- Kyle & Karissa & Alex +  Olivia & John & Ryan >(Amazon>Downey)  A/O & SS  each person: PEER EVALUATION = >> NFL GROUP 

AA2- Wilnir & Sean & Rushali + Sebastian & Jace & Gabby>(NFL>Gronkowski) A/O each person:PEER EVALUATION = >> TESLA GROUP 

AA3- * Andrew & James & Luke + Matt & Patrick & Joe >>> (Tesla>Dobrik)_____  each person:PEER EVALUATION =>>  AMAZON GROUP      

View graded presentations w/ comments & score by accessing the same folder you used for submitting your  video.










 

 

 

 

 

                              

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BELOW = PAST VERSION:

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

  last updated 12/9/19

F'19: 2625 Capstone Campaign / Team ProjectSHORT VERSION {MAJOR PRESENTATION #5}

S'20 change _ added 3/19/20

Due to this semester's circumstances of converting to totally remote instruction.  I have changed the submission  protocol.

Since longer papers now will be graded 100% online, it’s  much more efficient if you upload them into “Assignments” in Blackboard. Preliminary Planner Template, Final Submission Template & _______________  should be uploaded accordingly. You’ll find the upload location this way: There’s now a “WEBCAM“ link within the “Assignments” folder within the Dr. Plummer’s Course Information section.  EXCEPT for the partner & Company requests, please upload  the longer items  there.


RATIONALE & GOALS & TIMELINE:

PRESENTATION DATES:

PRESENTATION COMPONENTS & STRUCTURE:

LENGTH OF PRESENTATION

TOPICS GUIDELINES:

SUBMISSIONS: Preliminary Planner [SHORT VERSION]  // Final Presentation Agenda [ SHORT VERSION] {due day of...} ]

LIST OF GRADING RUBRICS:  for presenters      /     for questioners

 

Presentation Schedule  { / all presentations =  designated Exam session:    AA = Weds 12/11/19  @2:30-   // BB =  Mon 12/16/19  @10:10

 

Project Timelime Summary:

  PROJECT ACTION STEPS  GMAP session in-class
 {Groups Meet And Plan}   [10-20 minutes]
M-11/25 in class, Professor announces "mergers" [ deadline for advance email requests = 11/22] yes> GMAP
M-11/25 teams submit decision on Company selection  
     
11/27-12/1 Th Brk Teams meet outside of class (either virtually or in person) n.a.
     
M-12/2 in class finalize & submit  preliminary preparation  sheets {SHORT VERSION} yes> GMAP
W-12/4 Professor returns preliminary feedback yes> GMAP
M-12/9 Elevator Speech Day  Tentative> mini-GMAP
day of presentation[exam session] CAMPAIGN  PRESENTATIONS  (all 4)  

 

 

 

 

 

 

RATIONALE & GOALS

 

As you recall,  in the beginning of the semester, your level of communication skill was assessed by using  a complex oral activity as a

PRE-TEST: The Special Occasion unit. Similarly, this current oral project is complex, multi-faceted and will be used as a pragmatic 

"POST-TEST" to assess how far you have come in terms of:

> making content audience-centered,

> using strategic organization,

> having effective delivery techniques (both vocal & physical)

> handling critique & question/answer

 

 (a written, "take-home" final test will be used to assess how much you have learned & UNDERSTAND about the material in the textbook [submission via Blackboard]. )

 

PRESENTATION DATES:

 

 

Section AA [9:30]

 

Final Exam Session =  Weds 12/11/19  @2:30-4:30 -

Grp Competitive Campaign Presentations {ShrtVer} (all 4)  [as a "post-course Test"]

 
   

 

Section BB [3:30]

 

Final Exam Session =   Mon 12/16/19  @10:10 - 12:10-

Grp Competitive Campaign Presentations{ShrtVer}  (all 4)  [as a "post-course Test"]

 

 

PRESENTATION COMPONENTS & STRUCTURES: step-by-step

It all starts with the partnerships & selected companies used in the WebCam Presentation project..

1. Each WebCam partnership will  merge with another partnership for collaboration on creating this campaign. 

-This will result in a total of 4 groups -- each consisting of consisting of 4-5 members.

-Consider various criteria for selecting your match ups (mutual compatibility, negotiation, similarity of Webcam topics, etc.) 

-As before, if  necessary, your Professor will intervene to form and/or rearrange group memberships. finalized no later than 11/22

 

2. Each newly formed team/group will select ONE of their already-analyzed companies.

-It doesn't matter which, but you may want to base your selection on which one  is a better fit for this new task: pitching a new spokesperson.

 

3.  Imagine your group is a marketing team with the task of  selecting a celebrity/public figure to serve as the spokesperson for the company  you selected in step 2. 

-This person will be the "face" of your selected company--on television commercials, print advertisements, and online promotions .

- Using Dewey’s Reflective Thinking Process {explained in your textbook} , STRATEGIZE & SELECT a celebrity by following  this sequence:

     > FIRST consider what kind of image you want the product/company/initiative  to portray. 

     > THEN, brainstorm,   which "celebrity" possesses appropriate credibility and can create the desired image and convey the right message to

         your audience.  

     > THEN analyze the LOGOS/ETHOS/ & PATHOS this selected personality will lend to your company. Your eventual  presentation will be an argument of how your final choice as spokesperson will satisfy the company's NEEDS ( Pull out that 2 sided, "Motivated Sequence" worksheet. You'll need it!!!)

 

4. As a group,  plan a presentational campaign in which you will "pitch" your selected celebrity via a 10 minute persuasive presentation.

-The presentation should clearly apply  Monroe’s Motivated Sequence as well as the guidelines  for persuasive speaking as outlined in the chapter.

Grading points are allotted based on how effectively & explicitly  the persuasion techniques are applied to the team's argument.

     - Therefore, your team's last task is to prepare & deliver a persuasive presentation to a                    group of (hypothetical) decision makers.

 

5. For each presentation, 4-5 members of the audience will be pre-assigned as comprehensive and/or  analytical  questioners.

- After a brief Q & A period {only one question per designated questioner} if time the listeners will vote on whether to accept your proposed celebrity spokesperson and "green light" your proposal (i.e. implement your plan).

-You can think of your listeners as being similar to the "Sharks" we viewed.

- HOWEVER, instead of asking follow-up questions relevant to investment potential, the designated listeners will  be assigned to do either CRITICAL LISTENING or COMPREHENSIVE LISTENING in reference to your presentation's Ethos/Logos/Pathos. In other words, questioners will NOT ask  investment-type questions but rather will ask questions for clarification or for challenging the viability of your proposal.

 

PRESENTATION LENGTH

_5_ minutes maximum for  set-up  time

_ 10-12 minutes Full Team Presentation 

_Q&A: 10 minutes (@ group receives 4 questions (no question should take more than 1 minute to ask. Similarly, no answer should be longer than 1 minute)

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

This means each set  (i.e. slot) = 25 minutes

Roughly:  AA= slot 1=2:35-3:00  /  slot 2=3:05-3:30  /  slot 3= 3:35-4:00  /  slot 4=4:05-4:30

                 BB= slot 1=10:15-10:40  /  slot 2=10:45-11:10   /  slot 3= 11:15 - 11:40  /  slot 4=11:45-12:10

 

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Questioners will be assigned to exercise either ACTIVE/COMPREHENSIVE /or CRITICAL listening and to ask the team a question accordingly. The designated types of listening will be specified in advance -- as listed on the presentation schedule. Questioners will be evaluated according to the rubrics listed below.

 

 

TOPIC GUIDELINES (summary):

Your group has been given the responsibility of selecting a notable  personality  to serve as the spokesperson for the company  you selected in step 2 above.  This person will be the "face" of your company-- including television commercials, print advertisements, and online promotions. Using Dewey’s reflective thinking process [see textbook] , choose an appropriate  celebrity/public figure. While making your decision, consider what kind of image you want the product/or/company  to portray. Which celebrity possesses appropriate credibility and can create the desired image and convey the right message to your audience?

NB: You can expect questions about your experiences with "Dewey" on the upcoming test & quizzes.

 

 

SUBMISSIONS:

F'19 SHORT VERSION Preliminary Planner Template [click for copy of form]

original submission template [click for copy of form]

original submission template [click for copy of form]

Preliminary submission of  this Template is optional.

AND

F'19 SHORT VERSION FINAL Submission Template-  {printed/typed}  is required & due the day of presentation. All presentations will occur during your section's official exam session)

 

Questioners will be assigned to exercise either ACTIVE/COMPREHENSIVE /or CRITICAL listening and to ask the team a question accordingly. The designated types of listening will be specified in advance -- as listed on the presentation schedule. Questioners will be evaluated according to the rubrics listed below

GRADING RUBRICS:

for presenters -

For Group    
up to _40_points
[usually 80]		    points awarded 
  -Motivated Sequence Competence {other appropriate patterns accepted}  
  -ETHOS-LOGOS-PATHOS {applied as target audience strategies }  
  - Argumentation underlying Spokesperson choice {emphasis: reasoning & warrant}  
     
   -Presentational Clarity & Organization  
     
  -Evidence of Preparation & Practice  
     
  -Appropriate Choices & Usage of Presentation Aids  
     
  - Well handled Question & Answer segment  
     
  -All members participated cohesively ( team effort)  
     
  -Submission of Presentation Plan/Agenda with BIBLIOGRAPHY    pass / f ail
                                                                                                     Group Total      _________
     
For Individuals    
up to 10 points
[usually 20]

_____well prepared   /  ____vocal delivery effectiveness   /  ____ physical delivery skills  /   ______ extemporaneous engagement with listeners

 
                                                                                    Individual Total     ____________
     
                                                                                    GRAND TOTAL     ________

 

 

for questioners -


       Evaluators/questioners will use this form.Basically,"Comprehensive" evaluator/questioners will be asking QUESTIONS-OF-CLARIFICATION & "Critical" evaluator/questioners will be asking QUESTIONS-OF-ANALYSIS.    Be sure to commit the p.60 guidelines to memory!  At the end of the session,  your completed form will be submitted to the Professor to be used in grading the evaluators/questioners. That score will be incorporated in the individuals' overall grades for the project.

                              

 Peer Evaluation Form2 > Capstone Campaign Presentations - utilize p. 60 guidelines -

 Notate your evaluation of the group's presentation. Your assessment should be honest and constructive,

          providing the sort of feedback that you would find helpful if you were the presenter.

          Also, these questions will help focus your listening in order to construct your "psuedo-Shark" question.

As a whole, did the presenters seem poised & prepared?                             Yes           Somewhat           No

Comments/Suggestions:  __________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________________

Did the presenters use appropriate volume & vocal expression?                 Yes           Somewhat           No

Comments/Suggestions:  __________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________________

Did the presenters use extemporaneous delivery                                          Yes           Somewhat           No

(incl. eye contact, gestures, facial expression, "TO not "at", etc)?         

Comments/Suggestions:  __________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________________

Was the presentation's  introduction effective?                                            Yes           Somewhat           No

Comments/Suggestions:  __________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________________

Was the presentation's conclusion effective? ?                                             Yes           Somewhat           No

Comments/Suggestions:  __________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________________

[Compr.Listn] Could you easily identify and remember the group’s main points? Yes         Somewhat         No

Comments/Suggestions:  __________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________________

 

[Compr.Listn] Did the presentation's organizational patterns make sense to you?   Yes        Somewhat         No

Comments/Suggestions:  __________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________________

 

[Crit.Listn] Did the group's argumentation  clearly demonstrate the                  Yes           Somewhat           No

connection of EVIDENCE>to CLAIM>via WARRANT?   

Comments/Suggestions:  __________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________________

 

The best thing about the campaign presentation was:_____________________________________________

 

Recommended areas for improvement"________________________________________________________
 
USE THIS SPACE TO WRITE OUT YOUR "Challenge Question": [continue onto back]

ack

========================================================================

 

F '19 TEAMS:  (confirmed)

AA1- Alexis & Kelley + Reggie & Tristan  >>>>>>>>>>> (JUUL )          [template complete]               _FOURTH___slot

AA2- Lauren & Samantha + (Elze)& Hannah >>> ( FACEBOOK + AMAZON partnership) [items 2,4,5,6 p] _FIRST___slot

AA3- * Austin & Mack  & Mike +  Jason & Siddharth >>>>>>( WE WORK)              [page 2 pending]      _SECOND___slot

AA4-*Bobby & Jimmy + Lysa & Zack >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  (CBS network)          [items 5,6 pending]     __THIRD___slot

 

BB1- Chris & Jesse & Mark + Matt O. & Dave >> (TESLA+UBER collaborative initiative )  [item 6 pending]__FIRST__slot

BB2- Jake & Joe G. + Cameron & Darlene >>>>> (NFL- Newark Water Coalition)   [page 2 pending]  __SECOND___slot

BB3- Matt P & Matt T. + Bill & Jason >>>>>>> (NCAA )                           [template complete]                        ___THIRD____slot

BB4-* Liam & Joe S. + Austin & Ryan >>>>>>>> (APPLE)                    [page 2 pending]                          __FOURTH_____slot

11/22/19