last updated 4/24/19 ( 11/16/19)
Click here for the "Short Version"
2625 Capstone Campaign / Team Project {MAJOR PRESENTATION #5}
RATIONALE & GOALS & summary timeline tba:
PRESENTATION COMPONENTS & STRUCTURE:
SUBMISSIONS: Preliminary [sometimes optional. Ask. ] / Final [due day of...]
LIST OF GRADING RUBRICS: for presenters / for questioners
Presentation Schedule { / all presentations = 5/8/19 @ 2:30- }
ADD TABLE
RATIONALE & GOALS
As you recall, in the beginning of the semester, your level of communication skill was assessed by using a complex oral activity as a
PRE-TEST: The Special Occasion unit. Similarly, this current oral project is complex, multi-faceted and will be used as a pragmatic
"POST-TEST" to assess how far you have come in terms of:
> making content audience-centered,
> using strategic organization,
> having effective delivery techniques (both vocal & physical)
> handling critique & question/answer
(a written, "take-home" final test will be used to assess how much you have learned & UNDERSTAND about the material in the textbook [submission via Blackboard]. )
PRESENTATION DATES:
Section BB |
Scheduled Final Exam Session =
Weds 5/8/19 @ Grp Competitive Campaign Presentations (all 4) [considered as a "post-course Test"]
|
PRESENTATION COMPONENTS & STRUCTURES: step-by-step
It all starts with the partnerships & selected companies used in the WebCam Presentation project..
1. Each WebCam partnership will merge with another partnership for collaboration on creating this campaign.
-This will result in a total of 4 groups -- each consisting of consisting of 4-5 members.
-Consider various criteria for selecting your match ups (mutual compatibility, negotiation, similarity of Webcam topics, etc.)
-As before, if necessary, your Professor will intervene to form and/or rearrange group memberships. finalized no later than_________
2. Each newly formed team/group will select ONE of their already-analyzed companies.
-It doesn't matter which, but you may want to base your selection on which one is a better fit for this new task: pitching a new spokesperson.
3. Imagine your group is a marketing team with the task of selecting a celebrity/public figure to serve as the spokesperson for the company you selected in step 2.
-This person will be the "face" of your selected company--on television commercials, print advertisements, and online promotions .
- Using Dewey’s Reflective Thinking Process {explained in your textbook} , select a celebrity by following this sequence:
> FIRST consider what kind of image you want the product/company/initiative to portray.
> THEN, brainstorm which "celebrity" possesses appropriate credibility and can create the desired image and convey the right message to
your audience.
4. As a group, plan a presentational campaign in which you will "pitch"
your selected celebrity via a 10 minute
persuasive
-The presentation should clearly apply
5.
- After a brief Q & A period {only one question per
designated questioner}
-
- HOWEVER, instead of asking follow-up questions relevant to investment potential, the designated listeners will be assigned to do either CRITICAL LISTENING or COMPREHENSIVE LISTENING in reference to your presentation's Ethos/Logos/Pathos. In other words, questioners will NOT ask investment-type questions but rather will ask questions for clarification or for challenging the viability of your proposal.
PRESENTATION LENGTH
_5_ minutes maximum for set-up time
_ 10-12 minutes Full Team Presentation
_Q&A: 10 minutes (@ group receives 4 questions (no question should take more than 1 minute to ask. Similarly, no answer should be longer than 1 minute)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This means each set (i.e. slot) = 25 minutes
Roughly: slot 1=2:35-3:00 / slot 2=3:05-3:30 / slot 3= 3:35-4:00 / slot 4=4:05-4:30
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Questioners will be assigned to exercise either ACTIVE/COMPREHENSIVE /or CRITICAL listening and to ask the team a question accordingly. The designated types of listening will be specified in advance -- as listed on the presentation schedule. Questioners will be evaluated according to the rubrics listed below.
TOPIC GUIDELINES (summary):
Your group has been given the responsibility of selecting a "noteable personality" to serve as the spokesperson for the company you selected in step 2 above. This person will be the "face" of your company-- including television commercials, print advertisements, and online promotions. Using Dewey’s reflective thinking process [see textbook] , choose an appropriate celebrity/public figure. While making your decision, consider what kind of image you want the product/or/company to portray. Which celebrity possesses appropriate credibility and can create the desired image and convey the right message to your audience?
Your team's last task is to prepare & deliver a persuasive pitch to a group of (hypothetical) decision makers.
SUBMISSIONS:
submission template - standard version [click for copy of form]
Preliminary submission of this Template is optional.
BUT
Final Submission of this Template {printed/typed} is required & due the day of presentation. All presentations will occur during your section's official exam session)
GRADING RUBRICS:
for presenters -
For Group | ||
up to _80_points | points awarded | |
-Motivated Sequence Competence {other appropriate patterns accepted} | ||
-ETHOS-LOGOS-PATHOS {applied as target audience strategies } | ||
- Argumentation underlying Spokesperson choice {emphasis: reasoning & warrant} | ||
-Presentational Clarity & Organization | ||
-Evidence of Preparation & Practice | ||
-Appropriate Choices & Usage of Presentation Aids | ||
- Well handled Question & Answer segment | ||
-All members participated cohesively ( team effort) | ||
-Submission of Presentation Plan/Agenda with BIBLIOGRAPHY | pass / f ail | |
Group Total | _________ | |
For Individuals | ||
up to 20 points |
_____well prepared / ____vocal delivery effectiveness / ____ physical delivery skills / ______ extemporaneous engagement with listeners |
|
Individual Total | ____________ | |
GRAND TOTAL | ________ |
for questioners -
Evaluators/questioners will use this
form.Basically,"Comprehensive"
evaluator/questioners will be
asking QUESTIONS-OF-CLARIFICATION & "Critical" evaluator/questioners
will be asking QUESTIONS-OF-ANALYSIS. Be sure to commit the p.60 guidelines to memory!
At the end of the session, your completed form will be submitted to the Professor to be used in
grading the evaluators/questioners. That score will be incorporated in the
individuals' overall grades for the project.
========================================================================
Peer Evaluation Form2
> Capstone Campaign
Presentations - utilize p. 60 guidelines |
Notate your evaluation of the group's presentation. Your assessment should be honest and constructive,
providing the sort of feedback that
you would find helpful if you were the
presenter.
Also, these questions will help focus your listening in order to
construct your "psuedo-Shark" question. |
As a whole, did the presenters seem poised &
prepared?
Yes Somewhat
No Comments/Suggestions: __________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________ Did the presenters use appropriate volume & vocal
expression?
Yes
Somewhat
No Comments/Suggestions: __________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________ Did the presenters use extemporaneous delivery
Yes
Somewhat
No (incl. eye contact, gestures, facial expression, "TO not "at", etc)? Comments/Suggestions: __________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________ Was the presentation's introduction
effective?
Yes
Somewhat
No Comments/Suggestions: __________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________ Was the presentation's conclusion effective? ?
Yes
Somewhat
No Comments/Suggestions: __________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________ [Compr.Listn] Could you easily identify
and remember the group’s main points? Yes
Somewhat
No Comments/Suggestions: __________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________
|
[Compr.Listn]
Did the presentation's organizational
patterns make sense to you? Yes
Somewhat
No Comments/Suggestions: __________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________ [Crit.Listn] Did the group's argumentation clearly demonstrate the Yes Somewhat No connection of EVIDENCE>to CLAIM>via WARRANT? Comments/Suggestions: __________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________ The best thing about the campaign presentation was:_____________________________________________ Recommended areas for improvement"________________________________________________________ |
USE THIS SPACE TO WRITE OUT YOUR
"Challenge Question": [continue onto back] |
S '19 TEAMS:
1 - Anthony T & Carl + Anthony R & Alex >> ( __TOYS-R-US___) _2nd__slot
2- Claudia & Tommy + Victoria & Daniel S >> ( ___WHOLE FOODS [ after Amazon]___) _1st___slot
3 - Joe & Gene + Daniel R & Zeke & Tim >> ( __TESLA__) _3rd__slot
4- Schylar & Rebecca + Nick & Andrew >> ( __FACEBOOK__) __4th_slot
4/24/19