Speech Assignment Sheet {a how-to manual} [be sure to read this item in its entirety]
![]() - ![]() --- Convince me ---- |
|
P
END RESULT & PREPARATION STEPS:
LIST OF CURRENTLY RESERVED TOPICS
SUBMISSIONS: Preliminary [including PPSAP] / Final
UPDATED FOR Fall '20
Oral Communication (COST1600) – ONLINE
-MAJOR
PRESENTATION #4:
PERSUASIVE
a.k.a. Extemporaneous Public (Presentational) Speaking
Communicate!/Mindtap
> Submission of the topic reservation request via email is recommended no later
than Friday 11/20/20- 11:59pm.
> Submission of the PPSAP into the designated
Blackboard assignment folder is due no later than Tues 11/24/20- 11:59pm.
> Submission of the oral presentation video into Bongo is due no later than
Friday 12/4/20- 11:59pm
> Submission of the two different one-paragraph peer reviews in Bongo is due no
later than Sunday 12/6/20-11:59pm
Assignment Rationale-
Some Communication scholars have asserted that human nature can be characterized
as inherently persuasive in that most of our communicative acts seek to exert
some degree of influence (on the thoughts and/or behaviors of others).
Effectiveness in achieving such influence requires the blending of a complex
blend of several moving parts—including logical reasoning, psychological
strategies, and speaker credibility/believability.
General and Specific objectives-
General:
CLO 1:
Students will be able to construct
effective oral-style messages of varying communication purposes,
including informing, illustrating and persuading and will be able to
adapt their content, organization,
language, and delivery to the needs, interests and listening skills of any given
listener(s).
CLO 4:
Students
will be able to utilize extemporaneous
presentational delivery style, including the “conversational”/expressive vocal
delivery mode--whether presenting in-person or into a camera.
Specific:
Students will construct a speech to persuade (to convince or actuate) their
classmates in this class on a question of Fact /or/
Value /or/
Policy.
The end result
(1) A six-eight minute presentation, self-recorded into or uploaded into the
“Bongo” app within Mindtap. Due by 12/4/20.
(2) Complete two written peer reviews evaluating presentations of two different classmates.. This will be done via the “Bongo” app within Mindtap. Due by 12/6/20.
Steps in preparation- (This last prepared presentation serves as a capstone assignment- showing how you can pull together the lessons of the semester)
1.
Carefully read the textbook's/MindTap's comments
on the PRINCIPLES & the SUPPORTING MATERIALS used for basic
Persuasive Speaking.
[Chap 17 in 15ed] [ The Persuasion Slide Show in the Slide Show folder
in Blackboard ]
|
2.
Review your topic choice. For most people, this step was
accomplished during the in-class workshops on speech organization.
Additional topic choice specifications for your class are given in the
"Specifications" section below.
Whatever
the specifications, always be sure your topic is appropriate in 3 basic
ways {speaker / audience / context-occasion}. Also,
make sure it is "limited" & "well-focused" & does not attempt to take on
a subject area that is too broad.
|
3.
Audience analysis and adaptation is crucial for achieving effective
persuasion. To help you with this factor, complete & submit the
“Preliminary Persuasive Speech Adaptation Plan”
[PPSAP] . Example is in the Mindtap learning Path after 17.3/ sample
speech on Cyberbulling. In addition there is an assignment document
located in the course documents section in Blackboard & linked here.
4.
After receiving the feedback on your
PPSAP,
work on constructing your final Presentation Outline.
For
general guidelines on organization, preparation & visual/presentation
aids, see Chapters 12, 13, 14 & 15. Refer to the “Speech
Builder” application within Mindtap to review the components of this
construction process.
5.
Points will be deducted if you deliver the
presentation from a word-for-word manuscript
For most people, the best way to prepare for an
extemporaneous presentation is to AVOID writing out the planned
speech in word-for-word sentences. Don't think of your "speech"
as an essay being read out loud; rather, it's a dynamic oral
connection between speaker & audience. Also, resist the temptation to
write out major passages in word-for-word format as you prepare.
Instead, try out slightly different wordings as you practice.
Review
the extemporaneous technique
[see Chap 15-esp. pp.321-322 in 15ed].
4. NOTE: Your Professor prefers the "topic-phrase" outline style,
not the full sentence style that you see in these examples. And, despite
the formats found in some of the text's examples, you will not be
writing out your presentations in word-for-word form. |
5. Use your text's Persuasive Speech Evaluation Checklist [Fig 17.3 on p. 385 [15ed.] in order to evaluate yourself as you practice your presentation. |
6.
And Remember:
Topic:
As always, specific topics are up to the individual. Whatever the specific
topic, s you have read, Successful persuasion targets then addresses the
audience's needs (whether through satisfaction, advocacy . relevancy) as well as
the interests & enthusiasm of the speaker (e.g. advocacy). Topics are
first-come, first served and will need to be screened for appropriateness by the
Professor. The topic reservation process will start in mid-November. Email
your choice directly to the Professor who will review appropriateness & maintain
an online
topics-reservation-list
which will be linked here as well as to the course calendar.
Submissions
Preliminary
>Complete the
PPSAP.[Preliminary Persuasive Speech Adaptation Plan
- located
just after Figure 17.3
/
(CLO1,2)
Using your chosen persuasive topic, complete all 5 bullets: items 1-5 –also
located within the "Sample Speech Plan and Outline" section. Note: This
is not your usual Preliminary outlive assignment. This item should be uploaded
into the designated folder in Blackboard no later than Tues. 11/24/20.
Final
>Three items: Revised Outline + Video-recorded Speech + Slide
Deck
{if applicable}.
As always, the Final version of the outline-- revised &
corrected--needs to be included as a Word document uploaded in Bongo along with
the video of the speech.
Also remember, the "presentation/visual" aid component is optional for this
presentation but can be done in any way that is suited to your topic & speech
objective
{ e.g. demonstration, audience involvement, audio, slide show, photos,
object, etc. etc. etc. }
You need to be visible in video so be sure that your aid does not obscure your
listeners’ ability to see & evaluate your delivery.
Specifications (including summary
of due
dates)
Due Dates:
> Submission of the topic reservation request via email is due no later than
Friday 11/20/20- 11:59pm.
> Submission of the PPSAP into the designated Blackboard
assignment folder is due no later than Monday 11/23/20- 11:59pm.
> Submission of the oral presentation video into Bongo is due no later than
Friday 12/4/20- 11:59pm
> Submission of the two different one-paragraph peer reviews in Bongo is due no
later than Sunday 12/6/20-11:59pm
Oral:
> Time Limit:
Your total presentation time is 6-8 minutes—including any
visual/presentation aids (see next item)
> Presentation aids:
When they are well integrated into the oral message, visual/ audio presentation
aids greatly assist the ethos & pathos components of persuasion.
Over the course of this semester, each person was expected—at least once-- to
use Presentation Graphics (e.g. PowerPoint, Prezi, Keynote, etc.) for
creating & using a brief Slide Show [i.e. 3-5 slides].
However, if you have already met this requirement, you do not have to
incorporate presentation graphics in this current speech. Decide based on
what works best for your topic, goals, and timing.
> Final version of the Speech outline should include a Bibliography—using A.P.A.
or M.L.A. formatting.
Minimum
listing =
Internet source citations must list at the very least, the
[1] URL,
[2]
the
Title of the
particular Webpage you used, [3]
the Date that you accessed the page &
[4] (If available) the last date that
the page itself was updated. It is not sufficient to just list "web" or to just
list a URL. It
also would be wise to refer to the guidelines in the
Department of Communication's Policy on Academic Honesty .
Preparation tips - Recommendations – Resources
> Go to the Course Documents section in BlackBoard for an alternate, explanatory
version of the
"PPSAP”
document- mentioned above. Either version can be used to complete the
strategy-based action step assignment.
>TIP: For a more effective
presentation, don't use
the extra time length to:
(4)
spend time trying to fix a technical
difficulty (if
things aren't working, move on)
/or/
|
Instead, the extra time should be used for employing additional, strategically selected persuasive principles in order to target your specific audience (i.e. the people in THIS class). (Use the guidelines from your notes, from Chapter 17 & from the online slide shows & tutorials in MindTap & Blackboard).
This means you'll need to use a variety of communication
techniques as covered this semester. Strive to demonstrate your
creativity & communicator competence in how you sequence
your supporting materials to "PROVE" your persuasive "argument."
(“argument means to support your thesis statement with evidence and
reasoning. In Persuasive speaking, the thesis is often called the
"proposition".) |
>
ORGANIZATIONAL PATTERNS:
Successful persuaders are very strategic about the sequencing of
points & supporting materials. You will encounter many options in
your reading but if undecided, consider these two “classic” ones.as
appropriate: Statement-of--Logical-Reasons or Monroe’s-Motivated
-Sequence. Outlining,
supporting materials & speech structure will be major factors of
consideration for grading the persuasive presentation.
|
>
GRADING RUBRIC:
[Basic Extemporaneous Major Presentation]
{50X2}
/
{57.5X2} |
|
Evaluation Criteria |
Excellent
<16-20pt> |
Proficient
<11-15pt> |
Competent
<6-10pt> |
Minimal/Unsatisfactory
<0-5pt> |
ORGANIZATION |
Segments are clearly distinguishable
(e.g.
Introduction, Body,
Conclusion). Presentation uses various connectives to achieve
a cohesive sequencing that is easy to follow and reinforces the central
idea (Thesis Stmt) |
Main points follow a logical sequence but not all sections/ points were
clearly connected to each other . More internal connectives & summaries
were needed |
Main points follow a logical sequence but not all sections/point were
clearly or smoothly connected to each other |
Presentation lacks several key factors such as connectives, use of a
logical pattern and/or is difficult for listeners to follow. |
LANGUAGE |
Language structures & vocabulary
choices are mature, professional, non-colloquial, and vivid [ generating
imagery]. Word choices are appropriate for oral extemporaneous style
to the
given listeners.
|
Language and vocabulary choices are mostly well chosen for clarity and
audience comprehension. More use of vivid (oral language) technique
would be desirable |
Language and vocabulary choices are basic and acceptable. Use of some
non-explained terms &/or jargon. Language is more suited to written
communication rather than oral, extemporaneous settings
|
Speaker uses inappropriately casual language, slang, or obscure
wordings. Vocabulary choices are confusing for the audience (e.g. over
technical, in-group based, structurally unclear)
|
DELIVERY |
Speaker’s vocal & physical techniques are handled skillfully to motivate
listening (e.g. posture,
gestures, eye contact, meaningful vocal inflection,
voice clarity,
appropriate appearance,
etc.).
Speaker exhibits poise & preparation and also demonstrates rapport &
engagement.
|
Speaker exhibits an awareness of an audience-centered use of vocal &
physical techniques Could use a stronger blend of communicating WITH the
listeners
|
Speaker exhibits vocal & physical techniques that are adequate and
non-distracting. Could use more energy, physical skill and emotional
engagement with listeners |
Delivery techniques are not effective at enhancing listeners’
comprehension. Speaker does not exhibit confidence or adequate
preparedness.
|
SUPPORTING MATERIAL |
Supports are appropriately
varied (e.g. explanations,
examples, testimony, illustrations, statistics,
narratives, analogies, quotations, etc.).
and are directly relevant to the central idea. Material is of good
quality & enhances presenter’s credibility |
The supporting materials are adequate for supporting
(demonstrating/proving
/reinforcing) the Central idea.
The material establishes the
presenter’s credibility
on the topic. Could have used a more strategic blend &
sequencing of materials
|
The supporting materials provide some support of the Central idea
(demonstrating/
proving/reinforcing) the Central idea.
Believability would be stronger with material that is more concrete and
less generalized. |
The supporting materials are
insufficient for supporting and/or adding
credibility for either the Central idea or the speaker. More and more
types of supports are needed
|
CENTRAL MESSAGE |
Central idea (Thesis Stmt) is stated clearly, is skillfully “signposted”
and is explicitly coordinated to the supporting points.
The central idea is restated &
reinforced throughout the message.
|
Central idea (Thesis Stmt) is stated clearly, is skillfully “signposted”
and is somewhat coordinated to the supporting points. |
Central idea (Thesis Stmt) is implied but not specified. Connection to
the supporting points is implied but not explicitly summarized.
________ |
The Central idea is unclear or not evident. The stated Central idea is
not related to the supporting points.
|
PRESENTATION AIDS |
Presentation Aids are appropriate & used skillfully. Aids exhibit
appropriate aesthetic practices and are smoothly coordinated with the
vocal and physical delivery |
Presentation Aid choices are appropriate
& exhibit an awareness of appropriate aesthetic practices. More strategy
&/or audience centered techniques would be desirable. |
Presentation Aid choices adequately support and coordinate with the
message. They don’t distract but could do
more to enhance the listeners’ comprehension & appreciation of the More
audience-centeredness needed
|
Inappropriate choices result in lack of or misuse of presentation aids.
Slides do not exhibit effective
aesthetic strategies and are distracting, non-coordinated, and/or
difficult to read |
*Adapted from the Oral Communication
Value Rubric: Association of American Colleges and Universities
/ Plummer
NOTE:
If you have any questions or issues about your
topic, your outline, or your audience-centered strategies, contact your
professor
via email.