peerevaluation2 orig. "Short" Version F19  "Mini" Version: 

last updated 5/3/21 ( eval. matchups added)

PAGE TO BE UPDATED FOR F'21

2625 Capstone Campaign /Team ProjectMINI-virtual upload-VERSION {MAJOR PRESENTATION #5}

S'21

Recording/Submission-Upload Location Details:

HOW TO RECORD YOUR TEAM PRESENTATION:  two multiple camera recording options:
1 - via the Microsoft Stream function in MS Teams. Upload finalized video to Launchpad.{into  "Video Assessment - Grp Competitive Campaign Presentations"}

2- via the multiple camera Video Assessment function directly in Launchpad. {into  "Video Assessment - Grp Competitive Campaign Presentations"}

Both options require one person to serve as the "meeting convener/organizer." That person starts the meeting & recording & admits the other team members.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 REVIEW- HOW TO SUBMIT YOUR TEAM PRESENTATION: Video record via LaunchPad – as was done for the S'21 Selective-1 presentations. You can record directly into LaunchPad or can prerecord & upload it there.  

 In other words, You can record it directly into  the LaunchPad  app or , if you created  a separate videofile of your Presentation ( e,g, via MS Teams) , you can upload that into the same spot.

Note: The Final Template page needs to be submitted in its own slot, also within LaunchPad

Note: Any slide decks already will be integrated into the video presentation so separate upload is not necessary.

Note:  If you know how & someone has a double monitor set up, you can even try showing the slides as a minimized screen. IN ORDER TO GRADE THESE PRESENTATIONS ACCURATELY, it's important that all of the presenters can be  clearly seen & heard.


RATIONALE & GOALS & TIMELINE:

PRESENTATION DEADLINES: Upload  Peer Evaluation Form 2a  [Submission of this completed form will be a question on the written Final]

PRESENTATION COMPONENTS & STRUCTURE:

LENGTH OF PRESENTATION:

TOPICS GUIDELINES:

THIS SEMESTER'S TEAMS:

PEER EVALUATION FORM 2a


SUBMISSIONS: Preliminary Planner [SHORT VERSION]  // Final Presentation Agenda [ SHORT VERSION] {due day of upload.} ]


LIST OF GRADING RUBRICS:  for presenters      /     for questioners  n.a. this semester







Project Timelime Summary:
section last updated 4/20/21





  PROJECT ACTION STEPS  GMAP session in-class
 {Groups Meet And Plan}  [10-20 minutes]
if not listed below,  group planning is done outside of class session time
 
section BB MT1-Nick&McKenzie&Alexandra + Dom&Mika&Robbie [eval. NHL]
MT2-Kyle&Matt&Alex + Priscilla&Sr.Magdalena&Justin [eval NBA-bbl]
MT3-Joseph&Santiago&Piper + Mari&Trent&Pooja [evaluating WWF]
   
section AA MT1-Ellen&NickM&KevinC + Katie&Dan&Anthony [evaluating TESLA]
MT2-John&Gabe&Marcus + Robert&Tom [evaluating STARBUCKS]
MT3-Charles&Ian&Jacob + KevinO&Mya [evaluating AMAZON]
   
       
M - 4/19 in class, Professor announces "mergers"; distribution of Performance Contracts in SubChannel File Folder [ deadline for advance email requests =4/15] tentative>GMAP  
Th-4/22 n.l.t. by email, teams submit decision on Company selection
[Teams are working outside of class (virtually )]
  *deliverable 1: Company Choices- via email
4/22-4/29 [Teams are working outside of class (virtually)] tentative>GMAP on either 4/25 or 4/28  
F-4/30 n.l.t.  submit  Capstone Preliminary Planner  {SHORT VERSION} in MegaTeam's file folder   *deliverable 2: Prelim. Planner
M-5/3 during class, super-GMAP session / Professor begins returning preliminary feedback
yes> GMAP w/ Prof   
W-5/5 [Teams meet outside of class (virtually)]

Prof. available for virtual office hours - tba
yes> GMAP (TBD: class is EITHER super-GMAP or asynchronous)
 
 
M-5/10-11:59pm
in class,  finalize all submission details
[Teams meet outside of class (virtually)]
------------------------------------------
Deadline for uploading Capstone Campaign video- 11:59pm

 Have Peer Eval ready asap / no later than 5/1
5
Tentative> mini-GMAP *deliverables 3 & 4: Video upload &  its  Final Agenda by _5/10___
5/11-5/15 View assigned Peer Videos in LaunchPad. Complete the "Peer Evaluation Form 2a"  & be prepared to paste it into the online final exam ---------  
[exam session)

AA (12:30) = Mon 5/17@ 12:20-2:20
-----------------
 BB (9:30)  = Thurs 5/13 @ 2:30-4:30
written portion of Final [located in Blackboard] --------- *deliverable 5:  Copy & paste your completed Peer Evaluation Form 2a [presentation peer critiques ] into the Final Exam


(AA_MT1[Starbucks])  each person completes  PEER EVALUATION-2a  on _Tesla's _Presentation [submit as Question 1 on Final Exam ]

(AA_MT2[Amazon]) each person completes PEER EVALUATION-2a  on _Starbucks's   Presentation [ submit as Question 1 on Final Exam ]

(AA_MT3[Tesla] each person completes PEER EVALUATION 2a on Amazon's Presentation  [ submit as Question 1 on Final Exam ] 


(BB_MT1[NBA-Bubble]) each person completes PEER EVALUATION-2a  on _NHL's _Presentation [submit as Question 1 on Final Exam ]

(BB_MT2[WWF]) each person completes PEER EVALUATION-2a  on _NBA-bubble's   Presentation [ submit as Question 1 on Final Exam ]

(BB_MT3[NHL]each person completes PEER EVALUATION 2a on   WWF's Presentation  [ submit as Question 1 on Final Exam ] 










RATIONALE & GOALS

 

As you recall,  in the beginning of the semester, your level of communication skill was assessed via your completion of  a complex oral activity as a PRE-TEST: The Special Occasion unit. Similarly, this current, oral project is complex, multi-faceted and will be used as a pragmatic "POST-TEST" to assess how far you have come in terms of:

> making content audience-centered,

> using strategic organization,

> having effective delivery techniques (both vocal & physical)

(> handling critique & question/answer) if time

 

 

 






PRESENTATION COMPONENTS & STRUCTURES: step-by-step

It all starts with the partnerships & selected companies used in the WebCam Presentation project.

1. Each WebCam partnership will  merge with another partnership for collaboration on creating this campaign. 

-This will result in a total of 3 groups -- each consisting of consisting of 6 members.

-Consider various criteria for selecting your match ups (mutual compatibility, negotiation, similarity of Webcam topics, etc.

-As before, if  necessary, your Professor will intervene to form and/or rearrange group memberships. finalized no later than 4/14




2. Each newly formed team/group will select ONE of their already-analyzed companies.

-It doesn't matter which, but you may want to base your selection on which one  is a better fit for this new task: pitching a new spokesperson.

 

3.  Imagine your group is a marketing team with the task of  selecting a public figure to serve as the spokesperson for the company  you selected in step 2. 

-This person will be the "face" of your selected company--on television commercials, print advertisements, and online promotions .

- Using Dewey’s Reflective Thinking Process {explained in your textbook} , STRATEGIZE & SELECT a celebrity by following this sequence:

     > FIRST consider what kind of image you want the product/company/initiative to portray. 

     > THEN, brainstorm,   which "celebrity" possesses appropriate credibility and can create the desired image and convey the right message to your audience.  

     > THEN analyze the LOGOS / ETHOS / PATHOS this selected personality will lend to your company. Your eventual  presentation will be an argument of how your final choice as spokesperson will satisfy the company's needs (Pull out that 2 sided, "Motivated Sequence" worksheet. to be linked to the course calendar . In the meantime, use the version in your textbook/LaunchPad.  You'll need it!!!)

                 >
NB: You can expect questions about your experiences with "Dewey" on the upcoming test & quizzes.


4. As a group, plan a presentational campaign in which you will "pitch" your selected celebrity via a 10 minute persuasive presentation.

-The presentation should clearly apply  Monroe’s Motivated Sequence as well as the guidelines  for persuasive speaking as outlined in the chapter.

- Grading points are allotted based on how effectively & explicitly the persuasion techniques are applied to the team's argument.

- In other words, your team will prepare & deliver a persuasive presentation to an audience of (hypothetical) decision makers.

 

5.   S'21 alternate peer review procedure:  Each individual in each "mega-team" will be assigned to view & evaluate another group's campaign video. Below is a shortened  version of the  Peer Evaluation Form 2a  . View the other Team's video ( accessible in LaunchPad via same "Video Assessment" slot you used for your upload. -You can think of the listeners' role as being similar to the "Sharks" we viewed.

 Fill in the form. Don't forget the "Challenge" question that you would have asked if these had been done live. This question is NOT meant to ask for investment-potential information  but rather will ask for clarification or for challenging the viability of the Team's proposal.  In other words, questioners will apply CRITICAL LISTENING &  COMPREHENSIVE LISTENING in reference to the  presentation's Ethos/Logos/Pathos.

 If you want,  you also can notate  whether you would  accept the proposed spokesperson and "green light" the team's proposal (i.e. implement their plan).



PRESENTATION LENGTH

_ 10-12 minutes Full Team Presentation 

 

TOPIC GUIDELINES (summary):

Your group has been given the responsibility of selecting a notable  personality  to serve as the spokesperson for the company  you selected in step 2 above.  This person will be the "face" of your company-- including television commercials, print advertisements, and online promotions. Using Dewey’s reflective thinking process [see textbook] , choose an appropriate  celebrity/public figure. While making your decision, consider what kind of image you want the product/or/company  to portray. Which celebrity possesses appropriate credibility and can create the desired image and convey the right message to your audience?

NB: You can expect questions about your experiences with "Dewey" on the upcoming test & quizzes.

 


WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS:

S'21 Mini/SHORT VERSION Preliminary Planner Template [click for copy of form] Complete & email no later than 11/16-11:59pm 

AND

S'21 Mini/SHORT VERSION FINAL Submission Template-   is required & due the day of video upload. Submission location in LaunchPad drop box slot




------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


GRADING RUBRICS:



for presenters -

For Group    
up to _80_points    points awarded 
  -Motivated Sequence Competence {other appropriate patterns accepted}  
  -ETHOS-LOGOS-PATHOS {applied as target audience strategies }  
  - Argumentation underlying Spokesperson choice {emphasis: reasoning & warrant}  
     
   -Presentational Clarity & Organization  
     
  -Evidence of Preparation & Practice  
     
  -Appropriate Choices & Usage of Presentation Aids  
     
  - Well handled Question & Answer segment  
     
  -All members participated cohesively ( team effort)  
     
  -Submission of Presentation Plan/Agenda with BIBLIOGRAPHY    pass / f ail
                                                                                                     Group Total      _________
     
For Individuals    
up to 20 points

_____well prepared   /  ____vocal delivery effectiveness   /  ____ physical delivery skills  /   ______ extemporaneous engagement with listeners

 
                                                                                    Individual Total     ____________
     
                                                                                    GRAND TOTAL     ________




===================================================================================



 Peer Evaluation Form2a > Capstone Campaign Presentations - utilize p. 60/1 guidelines in your textbook-

 Each person completes this peer evaluation process separately. Notate your evaluation of the group's presentation [assignments listed below]. Your assessment should be honest and constructive, providing the sort of feedback that you would find helpful if you were the presenter. Your  professor will use your feedback to "evaluate you as an evaluator"  & you will receive 0 to 10 points for this question in the final exam.

         

 Also, these questions will help focus your listening in order to construct your "psuedo-Shark"

  question at the bottom.  [USE THIS TEMPLATE TO COMPLETE EVALUATION & PASTE IT INTO FINAL EXAM QUESTION SLOT]  Click here for additional guidelines on the S21 evaluation process.  page to be updated once groupings are set

 

1. As a whole, did the presenters seem poised & prepared?                     Yes   /   Somewhat   /   No

Comments/Suggestions: 

 

                      ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 

2. Did the presenters use appropriate volume & vocal expression?           Yes   /   Somewhat   /   No    

Comments/Suggestions: 

 

                      ----------------------------------------------------------------------  

 

3. Did the presenters use extemporaneous delivery                                  Yes   /   Somewhat   /   No

(incl. eye contact, gestures, facial expression, talked TO not "at", etc)?         

Comments/Suggestions: 

 

                      ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 

4. Was the presentation's  introduction effective?                                    Yes   /   Somewhat   /    No 

Comments/Suggestions: 

 

                      ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 

5. Was the presentation's conclusion effective?                                        Yes   /   Somewhat   /   No

Comments/Suggestions: 

 

                      ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 

6.[Compr.Listn] Identify at least three(3) of the group’s main persuasive points.  

Comments:

 

                      ----------------------------------------------------------------------

7.[Compr.Listn] Did the presentation make use of the Motivated Sequence? & How could you tell?

Comments: 

 

                      ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 

8.[Critical.Listn] Did the presentation draw clear connections between their CLAIM > to their EVIDENCE > to their WARRANT?  Explain                                       Yes   /   Somewhat   /   No

Comments: 

                      ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 


9.[Critical.Listn] Do you support the group's  proposed company spokesperson?  Yes / Somewhat  / No

Comments/Suggestions: 

 

                      ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 

10. The best thing about this campaign presentation was____________________: 

           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------------  

> USE THIS SPACE TO WRITE OUT YOUR "Challenge Question" {i.e., if you had heard this presentation live, what Shark Tank kind of question would you have asked them?

 

 
 
 

===========================================================================

 

S'21 TEAMS

AA1-  Ellen & Nick M & Kevin C   +  Katie & Daniel & Anthony>(Starbucks>)plnr_each person: PEER EVALUATION = >> Tesla  GROUP 

AA2-  John & Gabe & Marcus  +  Robert & Tom> (Amazon>D)plnr_ each person:PEER EVALUATION = >> Starbucks  GROUP 

AA3-  Charles & Ian & Jacob  +  Kevin O & Mya> (Tesla>D__)pln_  each person:PEER EVALUATION =>> Amazon__GROUP

 

BB1-  Nick V-L & Mckenzie & Alexandra + Dom & Mika & Robbie>(NBA-Bubble>D_)plnr each person: PEER EVALUATION = >> _NHL_ GROUP

BB2-  Kyle & Matt & Alex  +   Priscilla & Sr.Magdalena & Justin>(WWF >D_ )plnr_ each person:PEER EVALUATION = >>_NBA-bubble__GROUP 

BB3-  Joseph & Santiago & Piper  +  Mari & Trent & Pooja>(NHL>D_)plnr_  each person:PEER EVALUATION =>>  WWF_ GROUP      


   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   




**View completed presentations w/ any in-progress comments & score by
accessing the same folder you used for submitting your  video.










 

 

 

 

 

                              

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

  Below = ARCHIVED MATERIALS. NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS SEMESTER last updated 12/9/19

 

 

PAST VERSIONS [ Fall 2019 = short version][   
Below = original questioner procedures:

for questioners -

       Evaluators/questioners will use this form.Basically,"Comprehensive" evaluator/questioners will be asking QUESTIONS-OF-CLARIFICATION & "Critical" evaluator/questioners will be asking QUESTIONS-OF-ANALYSIS.    Be sure to commit the p.60 guidelines to memory!  At the end of the session,  your completed form will be submitted to the Professor to be used in grading the evaluators/questioners. That score will be incorporated in the individuals' overall grades for the project.

5. For each presentation, 4-5 members of the audience will be pre-assigned as comprehensive and/or  analytical  questioners.

- After a brief Q & A period {only one question per designated questioner} if time the listeners will vote on whether to accept your proposed celebrity spokesperson and "green light" your proposal (i.e. implement your plan).

-You can think of your listeners as being similar to the "Sharks" we viewed.

- HOWEVER, instead of asking follow-up questions relevant to investment potential, the designated listeners will  be assigned to do either CRITICAL LISTENING or COMPREHENSIVE LISTENING in reference to your presentation's Ethos/Logos/Pathos. In other words, questioners will NOT ask  investment-type questions but rather will ask questions for clarification or for challenging the viability of your proposal.

_Q&A: 10 minutes (@ group receives 4 questions (no question should take more than 1 minute to ask. Similarly, no answer should be longer than 1 minute)

Questioners will be assigned to exercise either ACTIVE/COMPREHENSIVE /or CRITICAL listening and to ask the team a question accordingly. The designated types of listening will be specified in advance -- as listed on the presentation schedule. Questioners will be evaluated according to the rubrics listed below.

 

 

                              

 Peer Evaluation Form2 > Capstone Campaign Presentations - utilize p. 60 guidelines -

 Notate your evaluation of the group's presentation. Your assessment should be honest and constructive,

          providing the sort of feedback that you would find helpful if you were the presenter.

          Also, these questions will help focus your listening in order to construct your "psuedo-Shark" question.

As a whole, did the presenters seem poised & prepared?                             Yes           Somewhat           No

Comments/Suggestions:  __________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________________

Did the presenters use appropriate volume & vocal expression?                 Yes           Somewhat           No

Comments/Suggestions:  __________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________________

Did the presenters use extemporaneous delivery                                          Yes           Somewhat           No

(incl. eye contact, gestures, facial expression, "TO not "at", etc)?         

Comments/Suggestions:  __________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________________

Was the presentation's  introduction effective?                                            Yes           Somewhat           No

Comments/Suggestions:  __________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________________

Was the presentation's conclusion effective? ?                                             Yes           Somewhat           No

Comments/Suggestions:  __________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________________

[Compr.Listn] Could you easily identify and remember the group’s main points? Yes         Somewhat         No

Comments/Suggestions:  __________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________________

 

[Compr.Listn] Did the presentation's organizational patterns make sense to you?   Yes        Somewhat         No

Comments/Suggestions  __________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________________

 

[Crit.Listn] Did the group's argumentation  clearly demonstrate the                  Yes           Somewhat           No

connection of EVIDENCE>to CLAIM>via WARRANT?   

Comments/Suggestions:  __________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________________

 

The best thing about the campaign presentation was:_____________________________________________

 

Recommended areas for improvement"________________________________________________________

 
USE THIS SPACE TO WRITE OUT YOUR "Challenge Question": [continue onto back]


========================================================================