peerevaluation2 orig. "Short" Version F19 "Mini" Version:
last updated 5/3/21 ( eval. matchups added)
PAGE TO BE UPDATED FOR F'21
2625 Capstone Campaign /Team ProjectMINI-virtual upload-VERSION {MAJOR PRESENTATION #5}
S'21 |
Recording/Submission-Upload Location Details: HOW TO RECORD YOUR TEAM PRESENTATION:
two multiple camera recording options: 2- via the multiple camera Video Assessment
function directly in Launchpad. {into
"Video
Assessment - Grp Competitive Campaign Presentations"}
Note: The Final Template page needs to be submitted in its own slot, also within LaunchPad Note: Any slide decks already will be integrated into the video presentation so separate upload is not necessary. Note: If you know how & someone has a double monitor set up, you can even try showing the slides as a minimized screen. IN ORDER TO GRADE THESE PRESENTATIONS ACCURATELY, it's important that all of the presenters can be clearly seen & heard.
|
RATIONALE & GOALS & TIMELINE: PRESENTATION DEADLINES: Upload / Peer Evaluation Form 2a [Submission of this completed form will be a question on the written Final] PRESENTATION COMPONENTS & STRUCTURE: LENGTH OF PRESENTATION: TOPICS GUIDELINES: THIS SEMESTER'S TEAMS: PEER EVALUATION FORM 2a SUBMISSIONS: Preliminary Planner [SHORT VERSION] // Final Presentation Agenda [ SHORT VERSION] {due day of upload.} ] LIST OF GRADING RUBRICS: for presenters / for questioners n.a. this semester Project Timelime Summary: section last updated 4/20/21
(AA _MT1[Starbucks]) each person completes PEER EVALUATION-2a on _Tesla's _Presentation [submit as Question 1 on Final Exam ](AA_MT2[Amazon]) each person completes PEER EVALUATION-2a on _Starbucks's Presentation [ submit as Question 1 on Final Exam ](AA_MT3[ Tesla] ) each person completes PEER EVALUATION 2a on Amazon's Presentation [ submit as Question 1 on Final Exam ]( BB_MT1[NBA-Bubble]) each person completes PEER EVALUATION-2a on _NHL's _Presentation [submit as Question 1 on Final Exam ](BB_MT2[WWF]) each person completes PEER EVALUATION-2a on _ NBA-bubble's Presentation [ submit as Question 1 on Final Exam ]( BB_MT3[NHL]) each person completes PEER EVALUATION 2a on WWF's Presentation [ submit as Question 1 on Final Exam ]RATIONALE & GOALS
As you recall, in the beginning of the semester, your level of communication skill was assessed via your completion of a complex oral activity as a PRE-TEST: The Special Occasion unit. Similarly, this current, oral project is complex, multi-faceted and will be used as a pragmatic "POST-TEST" to assess how far you have come in terms of: > making content audience-centered, > using strategic organization, > having effective delivery techniques (both vocal & physical) (> handling critique & question/answer) if time
PRESENTATION COMPONENTS & STRUCTURES: step-by-step It all starts with the partnerships & selected companies used in the WebCam Presentation project. 1. Each WebCam partnership will merge with another partnership for collaboration on creating this campaign. -This will result in a total of 3 groups -- each consisting of consisting of 6 members. -Consider various criteria for selecting your match ups (mutual compatibility, negotiation, similarity of Webcam topics, etc.) -As before, if necessary, your Professor will intervene to form and/or rearrange group memberships. finalized no later than 4/142. Each newly formed team/group will select ONE of their already-analyzed companies. -It doesn't matter which, but you may want to base your selection on which one is a better fit for this new task: pitching a new spokesperson.
3. Imagine your group is a marketing team with the task of selecting a public figure to serve as the spokesperson for the company you selected in step 2. -This person will be the "face" of your selected company--on television commercials, print advertisements, and online promotions . - Using Dewey’s Reflective Thinking Process {explained in your textbook} , STRATEGIZE & SELECT a celebrity by following this sequence: > FIRST consider what kind of image you want the product/company/initiative to portray. >
THEN, brainstorm,
which "celebrity" possesses appropriate credibility
and can create the desired image and convey the right message to your audience.
4. As a group, plan a presentational campaign in which you will "pitch"
your selected celebrity via a 10 minute persuasive
-The presentation should clearly apply
- Grading points are allotted based on how effectively & explicitly the persuasion techniques are applied to the team's argument. - In other words, your team will prepare & deliver a persuasive presentation to an audience of (hypothetical) decision makers.
5.
PRESENTATION LENGTH _ 10-12 minutes Full Team Presentation
TOPIC GUIDELINES (summary): Your group has been given the responsibility of selecting a notable personality to serve as the spokesperson for the company you selected in step 2 above. This person will be the "face" of your company-- including television commercials, print advertisements, and online promotions. Using Dewey’s reflective thinking process [see textbook] , choose an appropriate celebrity/public figure. While making your decision, consider what kind of image you want the product/or/company to portray. Which celebrity possesses appropriate credibility and can create the desired image and convey the right message to your audience? NB: You can expect questions about your experiences with "Dewey" on the upcoming test & quizzes.
WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS: S'21 Mini/SHORT VERSION Preliminary Planner Template [click for copy of form] Complete & email no later than 11/16-11:59pm AND S'21 Mini/SHORT VERSION FINAL Submission Template- is required & due the day of video upload. Submission location in LaunchPad drop box slot ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ GRADING RUBRICS: for presenters -
=========================================================================== AA1- Ellen & Nick M & Kevin C + Katie & Daniel & Anthony>(Starbucks>)plnr_each person: PEER EVALUATION = >> Tesla GROUPAA2- John & Gabe & Marcus + Robert & Tom> ( Amazon>D)plnr_ each person:PEER EVALUATION = >> Starbucks GROUPAA3- Charles & Ian & Jacob + Kevin O & Mya> (Tesla >D__)pln_ each person:PEER EVALUATION =>> Amazon__GROUP
BB1- Nick V-L & Mckenzie & Alexandra + Dom & Mika & Robbie>(NBA-Bubble>D_)plnr each person: PEER EVALUATION = >> _NHL_ GROUPBB2- Kyle & Matt & Alex + Priscilla & Sr.Magdalena & Justin>(WWF >D_ )plnr_ each person:PEER EVALUATION = >>_NBA-bubble__GROUPBB3- Joseph & Santiago & Piper + Mari & Trent & Pooja>(NHL>D_)plnr_ each person:PEER EVALUATION =>> WWF_ GROUP**View completed presentations w/ any in-progress comments & score by accessing the same folder you used for submitting your video. |
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Below = ARCHIVED MATERIALS. NOT APPLICABLE FOR THIS SEMESTER last updated 12/9/19
PAST VERSIONS [ Fall 2019 = short version][ Below = original questioner procedures: for questioners - Evaluators/questioners will use this form.Basically,"Comprehensive" evaluator/questioners will be asking QUESTIONS-OF-CLARIFICATION & "Critical" evaluator/questioners will be asking QUESTIONS-OF-ANALYSIS. Be sure to commit the p.60 guidelines to memory! At the end of the session, your completed form will be submitted to the Professor to be used in grading the evaluators/questioners. That score will be incorporated in the individuals' overall grades for the project. |
5.
- After a brief Q & A period {only one question per
designated questioner}
- - HOWEVER, instead of asking follow-up questions relevant to investment potential, the designated listeners will be assigned to do either CRITICAL LISTENING or COMPREHENSIVE LISTENING in reference to your presentation's Ethos/Logos/Pathos. In other words, questioners will NOT ask investment-type questions but rather will ask questions for clarification or for challenging the viability of your proposal. _Q&A: 10 minutes (@ group receives 4 questions (no question should take more than 1 minute to ask. Similarly, no answer should be longer than 1 minute) Questioners will be assigned to exercise either ACTIVE/COMPREHENSIVE /or CRITICAL listening and to ask the team a question accordingly. The designated types of listening will be specified in advance -- as listed on the presentation schedule. Questioners will be evaluated according to the rubrics listed below. |
Peer Evaluation Form2
> Capstone Campaign
Presentations - utilize p. 60 guidelines |
Notate your evaluation of the group's presentation. Your assessment should be honest and constructive,
providing the sort of feedback that
you would find helpful if you were the
presenter.
Also, these questions will help focus your listening in order to
construct your "psuedo-Shark" question. |
As a whole, did the presenters seem poised &
prepared?
Yes Somewhat
No Comments/Suggestions: __________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________ Did the presenters use appropriate volume & vocal
expression?
Yes
Somewhat
No Comments/Suggestions: __________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________ Did the presenters use extemporaneous delivery
Yes
Somewhat
No (incl. eye contact, gestures, facial expression, "TO not "at", etc)? Comments/Suggestions: __________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________ Was the presentation's introduction
effective?
Yes
Somewhat
No Comments/Suggestions: __________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________ Was the presentation's conclusion effective? ?
Yes
Somewhat
No Comments/Suggestions: __________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________ [Compr.Listn] Could you easily identify
and remember the group’s main points?
Yes
Somewhat
No Comments/Suggestions: __________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________
|
[Compr.Listn]
Did the presentation's organizational
patterns make sense to you?
Yes
Somewhat
No Comments/Suggestions __________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________ [Crit.Listn] Did the group's argumentation clearly demonstrate the Yes Somewhat No connection of EVIDENCE>to CLAIM>via WARRANT? Comments/Suggestions: __________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________________ The best thing about the campaign presentation was:_____________________________________________ Recommended areas for improvement"________________________________________________________ |
USE THIS SPACE TO WRITE OUT YOUR
"Challenge Question": [continue onto back]
|
========================================================================