peerevaluation2 orig. "Short" Version F19 "orig Mini" Version: 

last updated 11/28/22 ( updated names; added symposium component ;  prelim planner=streamlined version; )

In Progress for F'22

2625 Capstone Campaign /Team ProjectMINI-VERSION w/ symp. {MAJOR PRESENTATION #5} (in person)

RATIONALE & GOALS & TIMELINE:

PRESENTATION DEADLINES:

PRESENTATION COMPONENTS & STRUCTURE:

LENGTH OF PRESENTATION:

TOPICS GUIDELINES:

THIS SEMESTER'S TEAMS:

PEER EVALUATION FORM 2a


SUBMISSIONS:  Preliminary Planner Template -F22  // Final Presentation Agenda [ SHORT VERSION] {due no later than day of presentation} ] (Preliminary Planner [orig SHORT VERSION] 


LIST OF GRADING RUBRICS:  for presenters      /     for questioners 


PRESENTATION SCHEDULE:






Project Timeline Summary:
section last updated 4/27/22



  PROJECT ACTION STEPS  GMAP session in-class
 {Groups Meet And Plan}  [10-20 minutes]
if not listed below,  group planning is done outside of class session time
 
section AA MT1- _M____&_____&____ +___&_____&____ [will eval _MT#3]
MT2-_______&______&______ + _____&_____ [will eval _MT #1]
MT3-
_____&_____&______ + _____&______&______[will eval _MT #2]
   
section BB MT1-_M____&_____&____ +_____&_____&____ [will eval _MT#3]
MT2-_M______&______&______ + _____&_____ [will eval _MT #1]
MT3-_M______&______&______ + _____&____& ____ [will eval _MT #2]
   
       
       
M - 11/21 in class, networking to form "mergers"; distribution of Performance Contracts in SubChannel File Folder [ deadline for merger advance requests = email by 11:59pm] tentative>GMAP  
       
M-11/28 n.l.t. finalized"mergers"; by email, teams submit decision on Company selection
[Throughout, teams are expected to also work outside of class (virtually )]
  *deliverable 1: Company Choices- via email * cc all teammates
       
11/29<>12/2 [Teams are working outside of class (virtually)] If possible, in-class GMAP on either 11/28 or 11/30  
       
F-12/2 n.l.t.  submit  Capstone Preliminary Planner  {SHORT VERSION}.  Put doc in newly created, MegaTeam's file folder in Teams   *deliverable 2: Completed Prelim. Planner Teams folder
       
W-12/5 during class, super-GMAP session / Professor begins returning preliminary feedback to enable finalizing Planners
yes> GMAP w/ Prof check in   
       
12/6<>12/13 [MegaTeams meet outside of class (virtually), as needed]

Prof. available for virtual office hours - by appt

 
 
       
M-12/12-
in class,  triadmates briefly finalize all submission details / select presentation slots (1-3)
[as  necessary, MegaTeams also meet outside of class (virtually)]
------------------------------------------
Tentative> mini-GMAP  
       
T- 12/13/22(Reading Day) Deadline for uploading any supplemental Capstone Campaign videos- 11:59pm   deliverables 3 & 4:   recommended early submission  of Final Agenda/outline by 12/13-11:59

optional deliverables:Video upload tbd
       
[exam session)
-----------------
AA - Weds12/14/22 @ 2:30-4:30
 

BB -  Friday 12/16/22 @ 12:20 - 2:20
Live/in-person team presentations; written completion & submission of peer evaluation forms according to specified matchups to be listed on Presentation Schedule & using:  Peer Evaluation Form 2a

The written Final Exam will be located in Blackboard & will be available for a 48 hour period  - tba)
--------- *deliverable 5:
deadline= DAY OF PRESENTATION: Team's final agenda/outline-- incl. biblio.  - PRIOR to Exam session. Preferred delivery: Drop into its LaunchPad slot.

Alternate delivery:  via hard copy submission in the classroom.


(AA_MT1[Strbks])  each person completes PEER EVALUATION-2a on _______Presentation[also will be referenced within a Final Exam Question]

(AA_MT2[Adidas]  each person completes PEER EVALUATION-2a on ______ Presentation [also will be referenced within a Final Exam Question]

(AA_MT3 [Twttr_]each person completes PEER EVALUATION 2a on _____ Presentation [also will be referenced within a Final Exam question] 


(BB_MT1[Twittr])  each person completes PEER EVALUATION-2a on _______Presentation [also will be referenced within a Final Exam Question]

(BB_MT1[Apple])  each person completes PEER EVALUATION-2a on _
______Presentation [also will be referenced within a Final Exam  Question ]

(BB_MT1[Mcrsft])  each person completes PEER EVALUATION-2a on _
______Presentation [also will be referenced within a Final Exam question ]








RATIONALE & GOALS

 

As you recall, in the beginning of the semester, your level of communication skill was assessed via your completion of a complex oral activity as a PRE-TEST: The Special Occasion unit. Similarly, this current, COMPLEX oral project is complex, multi-faceted and will be used as a "POST-TEST" to assess how far you have come in terms of:

> making presentation content more audience-centered,

> using strategic organization,

> having effective delivery techniques (both vocal & physical)

> speaking succinctly with minimal notes

> handling critique & question/answer if time

 

 

 






PRESENTATION COMPONENTS & STRUCTURES: step-by-step

It all starts with the partnerships & selected companies used in the WebCam Presentation project.

1. Each WebCam partnership will merge with another partnership for collaboration on creating this campaign. 

-This will result in a total of 3 groups -- each consisting of consisting of 5-6 members.

-Consider various criteria for selecting your match ups (mutual compatibility, negotiation, similarity of Webcam topics, etc.

-As before, if necessary, your Professor will intervene to form and/or rearrange group memberships. finalized no later than 11/28




2. Each newly formed team/group will select ONE of their already-analyzed companies.

-It doesn't matter which, but you may want to base your selection on which one is a better fit for this new task: Pitching a new company  spokesperson.

 

3.  Imagine your group is a marketing team with the task of  selecting a public figure to serve as the spokesperson for the company you selected in step 2. 

-This person will be the "face" of your selected company--on television commercials, print advertisements, and online promotions. (e.g. Ryan Reynolds & Mint Mobile / Elmo & SHU)

- Approach your decision process via using Dewey’s Reflective Thinking Process {explained in your textbook}, STRATEGIZE & SELECT a celebrity by following this sequence:

     > FIRST consider what kind of image you want the product/company/initiative to portray. 

     > THEN, brainstorm,   which "celebrity" possesses appropriate credibility and can create the desired image and convey the right message to your audience.  

     > THEN analyze the LOGOS / ETHOS / PATHOS this selected personality will lend to your company. Your eventual  presentation will be an argument of how your final choice as spokesperson will satisfy the company's needs (Pull out that 2 sided, "Motivated Sequence" worksheet. to be linked to the course calendar . In the meantime, use the version in your textbook/LaunchPad.  You'll need it!!!)

                 >
NB: You can expect questions about your experiences with "Dewey" on the upcoming test & quizzes.


4. As a group, plan a presentational campaign in which you will "pitch" your selected celebrity via a 12-15 minute persuasive presentation.

-The presentation should clearly apply  Monroe’s Motivated Sequence as well as the guidelines  for persuasive speaking as outlined in the chapter.

- Grading points are allotted based on how effectively & explicitly the persuasion techniques are applied to the team's argument.

- In other words, your team will prepare & deliver a persuasive presentation to an audience of (hypothetical) decision makers.

- As in "Real World" campaign presentations, each person will participate vocally, but not necessarily doing the same kinds of tasks.

 

5.   F'22  peer review procedure:  Each individual in each "mega-team" will evaluate another group's campaign video. Below is a shortened  version of the Peer Evaluation Form 2a  . Below that is a summary of the group evaluation assignments. You will listen to the other Team's live presentation. You can think of your listener's  role as being similar to the "Sharks" we viewed-- especially  in terms of critical listening & thinking.

 Fill in the evaluation form {hard copies to be distributed in class} Don't forget to write down the "Challenge" question that you would like to ask. We might not have enough time for all questions to be asked during the final exam session.  This question should NOT ask for investment-potential information but rather should ask for clarification or for challenging the viability of the Team's proposal.  In other words, questioners will apply CRITICAL/ANALYTICAL  LISTENING &  COMPREHENSIVE LISTENING in reference to the presentation's Ethos/Logos/Pathos. This is just as we have been covering recently in class.

 You should also notate whether you would accept the proposed spokesperson and "green light" the team's proposal (i.e. implement their plan).



PRESENTATION LENGTH

_ 12-15 minutes Full Team Presentation  (including any pre-recorded items &/or multimedia). (including a specific speaking turn by each person)

 

TOPIC GUIDELINES (summary):

Your group has been given the responsibility of selecting a notable  personality  to serve as the spokesperson for the company  you selected in step 2 above.  This person will be the "face" of your company-- including television commercials, print advertisements, and online promotions. Using Dewey’s reflective thinking process [see textbook] , go through a quality decision making process to choose a strategically appropriate public figure/celebrity. While deliberating, consider what kind of image you wantyour product/or/company to portray. Which celebrity possesses the appropriate ETHOS and can create the desired image and convey the right message to your audience?

NB: You can expect questions about your experiences with "Dewey" on the upcoming test & quizzes.

 


WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS:

F'22 Mini/SHORT VERSION Preliminary Planner Template [click for copy of form] Complete & leave finalized version in your TEAMS folder no later than F  12/2/22-11:59pm. IF POSSIBLE, these will beworked on during the class session on 11/30/22.

AND

S'22 Mini/SHORT VERSION FINAL Submission Agenda Template-   is required & recommended asap but no later than the day of presentation. Preferred submission location in LaunchPad drop box slot. 




------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


GRADING RUBRICS:



for presenters -

For Group    
up to _80_points    points awarded 
  -Motivated Sequence Competence {other appropriate patterns accepted}  
  -ETHOS-LOGOS-PATHOS {applied as target audience strategies }  
  - Argumentation underlying Spokesperson choice {emphasis: reasoning & warrant}  
     
   -Presentational Clarity & Organization  
     
  -Evidence of Preparation & Practice  
     
  -Appropriate Choices & Usage of Presentation Aids  
     
  - Well handled Question & Answer segment  
     
  -All members participated cohesively ( team effort)  
     
  -Submission of Presentation Plan/Agenda with BIBLIOGRAPHY    pass / f ail
                                                                                                     Group Total      _________
     
For Individuals    
up to 20 points

_____well prepared   /  ____vocal delivery effectiveness   /  ____ physical delivery skills  /   ______ extemporaneous engagement with listeners

 
                                                                                    Individual Total     ____________
     
                                                                                    GRAND TOTAL     ________




===================================================================================


F.Y.I. - Hardcopies of Form 2a will be distributed at the session





 Peer Evaluation Form2a > Capstone Campaign Presentations ( F'22) - utilize p. 54/5 [7e= 60/1] guidelines in your textbook-

 Each person completes this peer evaluation process separately. Notate your evaluation of your specified group's presentation [assignments listed below]. Your assessment should be honest and constructive, providing the sort of feedback that you would find helpful if you were the presenter. Your  professor will use your feedback to "evaluate your skill as an evaluator". In addition, there will be at least one question based on your observation insights on the written final exam. 

         

 Also, these questions will help focus your listening in order to construct your "psuedo-Shark"

  question at the bottom.  [USE THIS TEMPLATE TO COMPLETE EVALUATION & PASTE IT INTO FINAL EXAM QUESTION SLOT]  Click here for additional guidelines on the F'22 evaluation process.  section  to be updated once groupings are set

 

1. As a whole, did the presenters seem poised & prepared?                  Yes   /   Somewhat   /   No

Comments/Suggestions: 

 

                      ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 

2. Did the presenters use appropriate volume & vocal expression?           Yes   /   Somewhat   /   No    

Comments/Suggestions: 

 

                      ----------------------------------------------------------------------  

 

3. Did the presenters use extemporaneous delivery                                  Yes   /   Somewhat   /   No

(incl. eye contact, gestures, facial expression, talked TO not "at", etc)?         

Comments/Suggestions: 

 

                      ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 

4. Was the presentation's  introduction effective?                                    Yes   /   Somewhat   /    No 

Comments/Suggestions: 

 

                      ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 

5. Was the presentation's conclusion effective?                                        Yes   /   Somewhat   /   No

Comments/Suggestions: 

 

                      ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 

6.[Compr.Listn] Identify at least three(3) of the group’s main persuasive points.  

Comments:

-

                      ----------------------------------------------------------------------

7.[Compr.Listn] Did the presentation make use of the Motivated Sequence? & How could you tell?

Comments: 

 

                      ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 

8.[Critical.Listn] Did the presentation draw clear connections between their       CLAIM > to their EVIDENCE > to their WARRANT?  Explain                                                                     Yes   /   Somewhat   /   No

Comments: 

                      ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 


9.[Critical.Listn] Do you support the group's  proposed company spokesperson?  Yes / Somewhat  / No

Comments/Suggestions: 

 

                      ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 

10. The best thing about this campaign presentation was____________________: 

           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------------  

> USE THIS SPACE TO WRITE OUT YOUR "Challenge Question" {i.e., if you had heard this presentation live, what Shark Tank kind of question would you have asked them?

 

 
 
 

===========================================================================

 

F'22 MegaTEAMS

AA1-plnr RCVD_Gardy & Jorge +Patrick Bryan & Renaldo  (Starbucks) each person: PEER EVALUATION = >> (E____) = GROUP _

AA2-plnr:RCVD__Chris & Ross & Shay + Arianna & Jake & Kelly(Adidas) each person:PEER EVALUATION = >> (S_____)=  GROUP  __

AA3-plnr: RCVD_Noah & Rikki +   Hugh & Michael (Twitter-)each person:PEER EVALUATION =>> (A______)_=GROUP __

 

 

BB1-plnr RCVD_Jalen & Madison & Taj + Michael & Nick & Ryan (Twitter) each person: PEER EVALUATION = >> (E____) = GROUP __

BB2-plnr RCVD_Anna-Lisa & Johanna & Margarita + Ashley & Kaitlyn (Apple) each person: PEER EVALUATION = >> (E____) = GROUP __

BB3-plnr RCVD_Adrian & Anne & Bishoy +_Filip_ & George & Joseph (Microsoft) each person: PEER EVALUATION = >> (E____) = GROUP __

 


plnr- revised 2022

streamlimed SHORT VERSION-v2 Capstone Campaign / Team Project Preliminary Planner Template

Mega Team #­­­___________ {fill in}

========================================================================================================================

1 > Our Selected  Company is: __________________________________________________________ {fill in}

2 > We have determined that our company's Image & ETHOS need a boost. The top three(3) effects/changes we would like to achieve are: {fill in at least 3 specific company needs}

3> Having the right spokesperson could help our company solve its image problem.  Our short list of celebrity/public figures  who might be suitable for that job are: (list at least three(3) names)  {fill in}

4> In making our final choice,  we will need to apply "critical thinking" about the situation.  For example: {fill in at least two(2) areas of analysis which will shape your deliberation on selecting the best person}

5> We realize that our presentation should apply the Motivated Sequence approach to persuasion. Our paraphrase/description of this particular pattern of organization is: {fill in 2-3 sentences in your own words}

6>We know that effective Persuasion uses PATHOS & ETHOS in addition to the LOGOS (i.re the evidence + reasoning).  We realize we will need to maximize all three(3) in our “Pitch Presentation”.  The elements of LOGOS for our selection are already previewed above in items 3,4,&5. One possible way  that we might utilize the other two(2) persuasion elements is: {fill in}

   
   
   
   
   














 

 

 

 

FYI 

How to Record a group segment in advance (for inclusion in the live presentation : (needs to be updated)

HOW TO RECORD YOUR TEAM PRESENTATION:  two multiple camera recording options:
1 - via the Microsoft Stream function in MS Teams. Upload finalized video to Launchpad.{into  "Video Assessment - Grp Competitive Campaign Presentations"}

2- via the multiple camera Video Assessment function directly in Launchpad. {into  "Video Assessment - Grp Competitive Campaign Presentations"}

Both options require one person to serve as the "meeting convener/organizer." That person starts the meeting & recording & admits the other team members.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 REVIEW- HOW TO SUBMIT YOUR TEAM PRESENTATION: Video record via LaunchPad – as was done for the S'21 Selective-1 presentations. You can record directly into LaunchPad or can prerecord & upload it there.  

 In other words, You can record it directly into  the LaunchPad  app or , if you created  a separate videofile of your Presentation ( e,g, via MS Teams) , you can upload that into the same spot.

Note: The Final Template page needs to be submitted in its own slot, also within LaunchPad

Note: Any slide decks already will be integrated into the video presentation so separate upload is not necessary.

Note:  If you know how & someone has a double monitor set up, you can even try showing the slides as a minimized screen. IN ORDER TO GRADE THESE PRESENTATIONS ACCURATELY, it's important that all of the presenters can be  clearly seen & heard.