RATIONALE & GOALS & TIMELINE:
PRESENTATION DEADLINES:
PRESENTATION COMPONENTS & STRUCTURE:
LENGTH OF PRESENTATION:
TOPICS
GUIDELINES:
THIS SEMESTER'S
TEAMS:
PEER EVALUATION FORM 2a
SUBMISSIONS:
Preliminary Planner Template -F22 //
Final Presentation Agenda [ SHORT
VERSION] {due no later than day of
presentation} ]
(Preliminary Planner
[orig SHORT VERSION]
LIST OF GRADING RUBRICS: for
presenters /
for questioners
PRESENTATION SCHEDULE:
Project Timeline Summary:
section last updated 4/27/22
|
PROJECT ACTION STEPS |
GMAP session
in-class
{Groups Meet And Plan} [10-20 minutes]
if not listed below, group planning is done outside of class
session time |
|
section AA |
MT1- _M____&_____&____
+___&_____&____ [will eval
_MT#3]
MT2-_______&______&______
+ _____&_____ [will eval
_MT #1]
MT3-_____&_____&______
+ _____&______&______[will eval
_MT #2]
|
|
|
section BB |
MT1-_M____&_____&____
+_____&_____&____ [will eval
_MT#3]
MT2-_M______&______&______
+ _____&_____ [will eval
_MT #1]
MT3-_M______&______&______
+ _____&____& ____ [will eval
_MT #2] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M - 11/21 |
in class,
networking to form "mergers"; distribution of Performance Contracts in SubChannel
File Folder
[ deadline for merger advance requests =
email by
11:59pm] |
tentative>GMAP |
|
|
|
|
|
M-11/28
n.l.t. |
finalized"mergers";
by email, teams submit decision on
Company selection
[Throughout, teams are expected to also work outside of
class (virtually )] |
|
*deliverable 1:
Company Choices- via email * cc all
teammates |
|
|
|
|
11/29<>12/2 |
[Teams are working outside of
class (virtually)] |
If possible, in-class GMAP
on either 11/28 or 11/30 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-12/2
n.l.t. |
submit Capstone Preliminary Planner
{SHORT VERSION}. Put doc in newly created, MegaTeam's file folder in Teams |
|
*deliverable 2:
Completed Prelim. Planner Teams folder |
|
|
|
|
W-12/5 |
during class, super-GMAP session /
Professor begins returning preliminary
feedback to enable finalizing Planners
|
yes> GMAP w/ Prof check
in |
|
|
|
|
|
12/6<>12/13 |
[MegaTeams meet outside of
class (virtually), as needed]
Prof. available
for virtual office hours - by appt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
M-12/12-
|
in class,
triadmates briefly finalize all submission details
/ select presentation slots (1-3)
[as necessary, MegaTeams also meet outside of class (virtually)]
------------------------------------------
|
Tentative> mini-GMAP |
|
|
|
|
|
T- 12/13/22(Reading Day) |
Deadline for uploading
any supplemental Capstone Campaign videos- 11:59pm |
|
deliverables 3 & 4: recommended
early submission of Final Agenda/outline by 12/13-11:59
optional
deliverables:Video upload tbd |
|
|
|
|
[exam session)
-----------------
AA -
Weds12/14/22 @ 2:30-4:30
BB - Friday 12/16/22 @ 12:20 - 2:20
|
Live/in-person team
presentations; written completion & submission of peer evaluation forms according to
specified matchups to be listed on Presentation Schedule & using:
Peer Evaluation Form 2a
The written Final Exam will be located in Blackboard & will be available for a 48 hour period
- tba) |
--------- |
*deliverable 5:
deadline= DAY OF PRESENTATION: Team's final agenda/outline-- incl. biblio.
- PRIOR to Exam session.
Preferred delivery: Drop into its LaunchPad slot.
Alternate delivery: via hard copy submission in the classroom.
|
(AA _MT1[Strbks])
each
person completes PEER EVALUATION-2a on
_______Presentation[also
will be referenced within a Final Exam Question]
(AA_MT2[Adidas]
each person completes
PEER
EVALUATION-2a on
______ Presentation
[also will be referenced within
a Final Exam Question]
(AA_MT3
[Twttr_] ) each
person completes PEER
EVALUATION 2a on _____ Presentation [also
will be referenced within a Final Exam question]
(BB_MT1[Twittr])
each
person completes PEER EVALUATION-2a on
_______Presentation [also will
be referenced within a Final Exam Question]
(BB_MT1[Apple])
each
person completes PEER EVALUATION-2a on
_______Presentation [also
will be referenced within a Final Exam Question ]
(BB_MT1[Mcrsft])
each
person completes PEER EVALUATION-2a on
_______Presentation [also
will be referenced within a Final Exam question ]
RATIONALE & GOALS
As you recall, in the beginning
of the semester, your level of communication skill was assessed via your
completion of a complex oral activity as a PRE-TEST: The Special Occasion unit.
Similarly, this current, COMPLEX oral project is complex, multi-faceted and will be used as a "POST-TEST" to assess how far you have come in terms of:
> making presentation content
more audience-centered,
> using strategic
organization,
> having effective delivery
techniques (both vocal & physical)
> speaking succinctly
with minimal notes
> handling critique &
question/answer if time
PRESENTATION COMPONENTS & STRUCTURES:
step-by-step
It all starts with the partnerships & selected
companies used in the WebCam Presentation project.
1.
Each WebCam partnership will merge with another partnership
for collaboration on creating this campaign.
-This will result in a total of 3 groups
-- each consisting of consisting
of 5-6 members.
-Consider various criteria for selecting your match ups (mutual
compatibility, negotiation, similarity of Webcam topics, etc.)
-As before,
if necessary, your
Professor will intervene to form and/or rearrange group memberships.
finalized no later than
11/28
2.
Each newly formed team/group will select ONE of their already-analyzed
companies.
-It doesn't matter which, but you may want to base your
selection on which one is a better fit for this new task:
Pitching a new company spokesperson.
3.
I magine
your group is a marketing team with the task of
selecting a public figure to
serve as the spokesperson for the company you selected in step 2.
-This person will be the "face" of your
selected company--on television
commercials, print advertisements, and online promotions.
(e.g. Ryan Reynolds & Mint Mobile / Elmo & SHU)
-
Approach your decision process via using Dewey’s Reflective Thinking Process
{explained in your textbook}, STRATEGIZE & SELECT a celebrity by following this sequence:
> FIRST consider what kind of image you
want the product/company/initiative to portray.
>
THEN, brainstorm,
which "celebrity" possesses appropriate credibility
and can create the desired image and convey the right message to your audience.
> THEN
analyze
the LOGOS / ETHOS / PATHOS this selected
personality will lend to your company. Your eventual presentation will be
an argument of how your final choice as spokesperson will satisfy the company's
needs (Pull out that 2 sided, "Motivated Sequence" worksheet. to be
linked to the course calendar . In the meantime, use
the version in your textbook/LaunchPad. You'll
need it!!!)
>
NB: You can expect questions
about
your experiences with "Dewey" on the
upcoming test & quizzes.
4. As a group, plan a presentational campaign in which you will "pitch"
your selected celebrity via a 12-15 minute persuasive
presentation.
-The presentation should clearly apply
Monroe’s Motivated Sequence
as well as the guidelines for persuasive speaking as outlined in the chapter.
- Grading points are allotted based on how effectively &
explicitly the persuasion techniques are applied to the team's argument.
- In other words, your team will prepare &
deliver a persuasive presentation to an audience of (hypothetical)
decision makers.
- As in "Real World" campaign presentations,
each person will participate vocally, but not necessarily doing the same
kinds of tasks.
5.
F'22 peer review procedure:
Each individual in each "mega-team" will evaluate
another group's campaign video. Below is a shortened version of the Peer Evaluation Form 2a
. Below that is a summary of the group evaluation assignments. You will listen to
the other Team's live presentation.
You can think of your listener's role
as being similar to the
"Sharks" we viewed-- especially in terms of
critical listening & thinking.
Fill in the evaluation form
{hard copies to be distributed in class}.
Don't forget to write down the "Challenge" question that
you would like to ask. We might not have enough time for all
questions to be asked during the final exam session. This question
should NOT ask for investment-potential
information but rather should ask for
clarification or for challenging
the viability of the Team's proposal. In other words, questioners will
apply CRITICAL/ANALYTICAL LISTENING & COMPREHENSIVE LISTENING
in reference to the presentation's Ethos/Logos/Pathos. This is just
as we have been covering recently in class.
You should also notate whether you would accept the proposed spokesperson and "green light"
the team's proposal (i.e. implement their plan).
PRESENTATION LENGTH
_ 12-15
minutes Full Team Presentation
(including any pre-recorded items &/or multimedia).
(including a specific speaking turn by each person)
TOPIC GUIDELINES (summary):
Your
group has been given the responsibility of
selecting a notable personality to
serve as the spokesperson for the company you selected in step 2
above.
This person will be the "face" of your company-- including television
commercials, print advertisements, and online promotions.
Using Dewey’s reflective thinking process
[see textbook]
,
go through a quality decision making process to choose a strategically appropriate public figure/celebrity. While
deliberating, consider what kind of image you
wantyour product/or/company to portray. Which celebrity possesses
the appropriate ETHOS
and can create the desired image and convey the right message to your audience?
NB: You can expect questions
about
your experiences with "Dewey" on the
upcoming test & quizzes.
WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS:
F'22
Mini/SHORT VERSION
Preliminary
Planner Template
[click for copy of
form]
Complete & leave finalized version in your TEAMS folder no later than F
12/2/22-11:59pm.
IF POSSIBLE, these will beworked on during the class
session on 11/30/22.
AND
S'22
Mini/SHORT VERSION
FINAL
Submission Agenda Template-
is required & recommended asap but no later than the day of
presentation. Preferred submission location in LaunchPad drop box slot.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GRADING RUBRICS:
for presenters -
For Group |
|
|
up to _80_points |
|
points awarded |
|
-Motivated Sequence
Competence {other appropriate patterns accepted} |
|
|
-ETHOS-LOGOS-PATHOS
{applied as target audience strategies } |
|
|
- Argumentation underlying
Spokesperson choice {emphasis: reasoning &
warrant} |
|
|
|
|
|
-Presentational
Clarity & Organization |
|
|
|
|
|
-Evidence of Preparation &
Practice |
|
|
|
|
|
-Appropriate Choices &
Usage of
Presentation Aids |
|
|
|
|
|
- Well handled
Question &
Answer segment |
|
|
|
|
|
-All members participated
cohesively ( team effort) |
|
|
|
|
|
-Submission of
Presentation Plan/Agenda with BIBLIOGRAPHY |
pass / f ail |
|
Group Total |
_________ |
|
|
|
For Individuals |
|
|
up to 20 points |
_____well prepared / ____vocal
delivery effectiveness / ____ physical
delivery skills /
______ extemporaneous engagement with listeners
|
|
|
Individual Total |
____________ |
|
|
|
|
GRAND TOTAL |
________ |
===================================================================================
F.Y.I. - Hardcopies of Form 2a will be distributed at the
session
Peer Evaluation Form2a
> Capstone Campaign
Presentations ( F'22) - utilize p. 54/5
[7e= 60/1] guidelines
in your textbook-
|
Each
person completes this peer evaluation process separately.
Notate your evaluation of your specified group's presentation
[assignments listed below]. Your assessment should be honest
and constructive,
providing the sort of feedback that
you would find helpful if you were the
presenter. Your professor will use your feedback to
"evaluate your skill as an evaluator". In addition, there will be at
least one question based on your observation insights on the written
final exam.
Also, these questions will help focus your listening in order to
construct your "psuedo-Shark"
question
at the bottom. [USE
THIS TEMPLATE TO COMPLETE EVALUATION & PASTE IT INTO FINAL EXAM QUESTION
SLOT] Click here for
additional guidelines on the F'22 evaluation process.
section to be updated once groupings are
set
|
1. As a whole, did the presenters seem poised &
prepared?
Yes / Somewhat
/ No
Comments/Suggestions:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Did the presenters use appropriate volume & vocal
expression?
Yes / Somewhat / No
Comments/Suggestions:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Did the presenters use extemporaneous delivery
Yes / Somewhat / No
(incl. eye contact, gestures, facial expression,
talked TO
not "at", etc)?
Comments/Suggestions:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Was the presentation's introduction
effective? Yes
/ Somewhat / No
Comments/Suggestions:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Was the presentation's conclusion effective?
Yes / Somewhat
/ No
Comments/Suggestions:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
6.[Compr.Listn] Identify
at least three(3) of the group’s main persuasive points.
Comments:
-
----------------------------------------------------------------------
7.[Compr.Listn] Did the
presentation make use of the Motivated Sequence? & How could you tell?
Comments:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
8.[Critical.Listn] Did the
presentation draw clear connections between their
CLAIM > to their EVIDENCE > to their
WARRANT? Explain
Yes / Somewhat /
No
Comments:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
9.[Critical.Listn] Do you
support the group's proposed company spokesperson? Yes / Somewhat
/ No
Comments/Suggestions:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
10. The best thing about this campaign
presentation was____________________:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> USE THIS SPACE TO WRITE OUT YOUR "Challenge Question" {i.e., if you
had heard this presentation live, what Shark Tank kind of question would
you have asked them?
|
|
|
|
===========================================================================
AA1- plnr
RCVD_Gardy
& Jorge +Patrick
Bryan & Renaldo
(Starbucks)
each person: PEER EVALUATION = >>
(E____) = GROUP _
AA2- plnr:RCVD__Chris
& Ross & Shay +
Arianna
& Jake &
Kelly(Adidas)
each person:PEER
EVALUATION = >>
(S_____)=
GROUP __
AA3-plnr:
RCVD_Noah & Rikki
+
Hugh &
Michael (Twitter-)each
person:PEER
EVALUATION =>> (A______)_=GROUP
__
BB1-plnr
RCVD_ Jalen
& Madison
&
Taj +
Michael & Nick & Ryan
(Twitter)
each person: PEER EVALUATION = >>
(E____) = GROUP __
BB2-plnr
RCVD_Anna-Lisa
& Johanna & Margarita +
Ashley & Kaitlyn
(Apple)
each person: PEER EVALUATION = >>
(E____) = GROUP __
BB3-plnr
RCVD_Adrian
& Anne &
Bishoy +_Filip_ & George
& Joseph
(Microsoft)
each person: PEER EVALUATION = >>
(E____) = GROUP __
plnr-
revised 2022
streamlimed
SHORT VERSION-v2
Capstone Campaign
/ Team Project Preliminary
Planner Template
Mega Team #___________ {fill in}
========================================================================================================================
1 > Our
Selected Company is: __________________________________________________________
{fill in}
2 > We
have determined that our company's Image & ETHOS need a
boost. The top three(3) effects/changes we would like to
achieve are:
{fill in at least 3 specific
company needs}
3> Having
the right spokesperson could help our company solve its
image problem. Our short list of celebrity/public
figures who might be suitable for that job are: (list
at least three(3) names)
{fill in}
4> In
making our final choice, we will need to apply
"critical thinking" about the situation. For
example: {fill
in at least two(2) areas of analysis which will shape
your deliberation on selecting the best person}
5> We
realize that our presentation should apply the Motivated
Sequence approach to persuasion. Our
paraphrase/description of this particular pattern of
organization is:
{fill in 2-3 sentences in
your own words}
6>We
know that effective Persuasion uses PATHOS & ETHOS in
addition to the LOGOS (i.re the evidence + reasoning). We
realize we will need to maximize all three(3) in our
“Pitch Presentation”. The elements of LOGOS for our
selection are already previewed above in items 3,4,&5.
One possible way that we might utilize the other
two(2) persuasion elements is:
{fill in}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|