peerevaluation2 orig. "Short" Version F19  "orig Mini" Version: 

TO BE UPDATED FOR CURRENT SEMESTER last updated 12/15/21 ( _)

Ongoing Updates for F'21

2625 Capstone Campaign /Team ProjectMINI-in person -VERSION {MAJOR PRESENTATION #5}


RATIONALE & GOALS & TIMELINE:

PRESENTATION DEADLINES:

PRESENTATION COMPONENTS & STRUCTURE:

LENGTH OF PRESENTATION:

TOPICS GUIDELINES:

THIS SEMESTER'S TEAMS:

PEER EVALUATION FORM 2a


SUBMISSIONS: Preliminary Planner [SHORT VERSION]  // Final Presentation Agenda [ SHORT VERSION] {due no later than  day of presentation} ]


LIST OF GRADING RUBRICS:  for presenters      /     for questioners 


PRESENTATION SCHEDULE






Project Timelime Summary:
section last updated 12/5/21



  PROJECT ACTION STEPS  GMAP session in-class
 {Groups Meet And Plan}  [10-20 minutes]
if not listed below,  group planning is done outside of class session time
 
section AA MT1-_Scott_&_Fabio_&_Kwame_ + _Bharath_&_Justin_&_Mark_ [will eval _MT?_]
MT2-_Aidan_&_Declan_&_Zak_ + _Chris_&_Bowen_&_Joe_ [will eval _MT?__]
MT3-
_Matt_&_Alex_&_Paul_ + _Darlene_&_Kennedie_&_Gabby_ [will eval _MT?_]
   
       
M - 11/22 in class, Professor announces finalized"mergers"; distribution of Performance Contracts in SubChannel File Folder [ deadline for merger advance requests = email by 11/19] tentative>GMAP  
       
W-11/24 n.l.t. by email, teams submit decision on Company selection
[Teams also are working outside of class (virtually )]
  *deliverable 1: Company Choices- via email * cc.
       
11/29<>12/3 [Teams are working outside of class (virtually)] tentative>GMAP on either 11/29 or 12/1  
       
F-12/3 n.l.t.  submit  Capstone Preliminary Planner  {SHORT VERSION}. Put doc in MegaTeam's file folder in Teams   *deliverable 2: Prelim. Planner
       
M-12/6 during class, super-GMAP session / Professor begins returning preliminary feedback
yes> GMAP w/ Prof   
       
12/8<>12/12 [Teams meet outside of class (virtually), as needed]

Prof. available for virtual office hours - tba
yes> GMAP (TBD: class is EITHER super-GMAP or asynchronous)
 
 
       
M-12/13-
in class, briefly finalize all submission details / select slots
[as  necessary, Teams also meet outside of class (virtually)]
------------------------------------------
Tentative> mini-GMAP  
       
T-12/14 (rdg day) Deadline for uploading any supplemental Capstone Campaign videos- 11:59pm   deliverables 3 & 4:  recommended Final Agenda/outline by _12/14_-11:59

optional deliverables:Video upload tbd
       
[exam session)
-----------------
AA  = Thurs 12/15 @ 2:30-4:30
Live/in-person team presentation; completion of peer evaluation 2 forms according to specified matchups Peer Evaluation Form 2a

( The written Final [located in Blackboard]will be available for  a 48 hour period tba)
--------- *deliverable 5:
deadline: Team's final agenda/outline-- incl. biblio.  2:00pm

Submit in LaunchPad or via hard copy submission in the classroom.


(AA_MT1[DrDsh])  each person completes  PEER EVALUATION-2a  on the_Uber_Presentation [will reference as part of Question 2 on Final Exam ]

(AA_MT2 [FB/Meta]) each person completes PEER EVALUATION-2a on _DrDsh  Presentation [will reference as part of Question 2 on Final Exam ]

(AA_MT3 [Uber]each person completes PEER EVALUATION 2a on _FB/Meta Presentation  [will reference as part of Question2 on Final Exam ] 



 





RATIONALE & GOALS

 

As you recall,  in the beginning of the semester, your level of communication skill was assessed via your completion of  a complex oral activity as a PRE-TEST: The Special Occasion unit. Similarly, this current, oral project is complex, multi-faceted and will be used as a pragmatic "POST-TEST" to assess how far you have come in terms of:

> making presentation content more audience-centered,

> using strategic organization,

> having effective delivery techniques (both vocal & physical)

(> handling critique & question/answer) if time

 

 

 






PRESENTATION COMPONENTS & STRUCTURES: step-by-step

It all starts with the partnerships & selected companies used in the WebCam Presentation project.

1. Each WebCam partnership will  merge with another partnership for collaboration on creating this campaign. 

-This will result in a total of 3 groups -- each consisting of consisting of 6 members.

-Consider various criteria for selecting your match ups (mutual compatibility, negotiation, similarity of Webcam topics, etc.

-As before, if  necessary, your Professor will intervene to form and/or rearrange group memberships. finalized no later than 11/22




2. Each newly formed team/group will select ONE of their already-analyzed companies.

-It doesn't matter which, but you may want to base your selection on which one  is a better fit for this new task: pitching a new spokesperson.

 

3.  Imagine your group is a marketing team with the task of  selecting a public figure to serve as the spokesperson for the company  you selected in step 2. 

-This person will be the "face" of your selected company--on television commercials, print advertisements, and online promotions .

- Using Dewey’s Reflective Thinking Process {explained in your textbook} , STRATEGIZE & SELECT a celebrity by following this sequence:

     > FIRST consider what kind of image you want the product/company/initiative to portray. 

     > THEN, brainstorm,   which "celebrity" possesses appropriate credibility and can create the desired image and convey the right message to your audience.  

     > THEN analyze the LOGOS / ETHOS / PATHOS this selected personality will lend to your company. Your eventual  presentation will be an argument of how your final choice as spokesperson will satisfy the company's needs (Pull out that 2 sided, "Motivated Sequence" worksheet. to be linked to the course calendar . In the meantime, use the version in your textbook/LaunchPad.  You'll need it!!!)

                 >
NB: You can expect questions about your experiences with "Dewey" on the upcoming test & quizzes.


4. As a group, plan a presentational campaign in which you will "pitch" your selected celebrity via a 10 minute persuasive presentation.

-The presentation should clearly apply  Monroe’s Motivated Sequence as well as the guidelines  for persuasive speaking as outlined in the chapter.

- Grading points are allotted based on how effectively & explicitly the persuasion techniques are applied to the team's argument.

- In other words, your team will prepare & deliver a persuasive presentation to an audience of (hypothetical) decision makers.

 

5.   F'21  peer review procedure:  Each individual in each "mega-team" will be assigned to view & evaluate another group's campaign video. Below is a shortened  version of the  Peer Evaluation Form 2a  .  You will listen to other Team's live presentation.  -You can think of the listeners' role as being similar to the "Sharks" we viewed.

 Fill in the form. Don't forget the "Challenge" question that you would like to ask. We might not have  enough time for all questions to  be asked dueing the final exam session.  This question is NOT meant to ask for investment-potential information  but rather will ask for clarification or for challenging the viability of the Team's proposal.  In other words, questioners will apply CRITICAL/ANALYTICAL  LISTENING &  COMPREHENSIVE LISTENING in reference to the presentation's Ethos/Logos/Pathos.

 If you want,  you also can notate  whether you would  accept the proposed spokesperson and "green light" the team's proposal (i.e. implement their plan).



PRESENTATION LENGTH

_ 10-12 minutes Full Team Presentation  (including any pre-recorded items &/or multimedia).

 

TOPIC GUIDELINES (summary):

Your group has been given the responsibility of selecting a notable  personality  to serve as the spokesperson for the company  you selected in step 2 above.  This person will be the "face" of your company-- including television commercials, print advertisements, and online promotions. Using Dewey’s reflective thinking process [see textbook] , choose an appropriate  celebrity/public figure. While making your decision, consider what kind of image you want the product/or/company  to portray. Which celebrity possesses appropriate credibility and can create the desired image and convey the right message to your audience?

NB: You can expect questions about your experiences with "Dewey" on the upcoming test & quizzes.

 


WRITTEN SUBMISSIONS:

F'21 Mini/SHORT VERSION Preliminary Planner Template [click for copy of form] Complete & email no later than F 12/3-11:59pm. IF POSSIBLE, these will already be completed in class on 12/1/21.

AND

F'21 Mini/SHORT VERSION FINAL Submission Template-   is required & recommended by 12/14/21but no later than the day of presentation. Submission location in LaunchPad drop box slot




------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


GRADING RUBRICS:



for presenters -

For Group    
up to _80_points    points awarded 
  -Motivated Sequence Competence {other appropriate patterns accepted}  
  -ETHOS-LOGOS-PATHOS {applied as target audience strategies }  
  - Argumentation underlying Spokesperson choice {emphasis: reasoning & warrant}  
     
   -Presentational Clarity & Organization  
     
  -Evidence of Preparation & Practice  
     
  -Appropriate Choices & Usage of Presentation Aids  
     
  - Well handled Question & Answer segment  
     
  -All members participated cohesively ( team effort)  
     
  -Submission of Presentation Plan/Agenda with BIBLIOGRAPHY    pass / f ail
                                                                                                     Group Total      _________
     
For Individuals    
up to 20 points

_____well prepared   /  ____vocal delivery effectiveness   /  ____ physical delivery skills  /   ______ extemporaneous engagement with listeners

 
                                                                                    Individual Total     ____________
     
                                                                                    GRAND TOTAL     ________




===================================================================================



 Peer Evaluation Form2a > Capstone Campaign Presentations ( F'21) - utilize p. 60/1 guidelines in your textbook-

 Each person completes this peer evaluation process separately. Notate your evaluation of your specified group's presentation [assignments listed below]. Your assessment should be honest and constructive, providing the sort of feedback that you would find helpful if you were the presenter. Your  professor will use your feedback to "evaluate your skill as an evaluator". In addition, there will be at least one question based on your observation insights on the written final exam. 

         

 Also, these questions will help focus your listening in order to construct your "psuedo-Shark"

  question at the bottom.  [USE THIS TEMPLATE TO COMPLETE EVALUATION & PASTE IT INTO FINAL EXAM QUESTION SLOT]  Click here for additional guidelines on the F21 evaluation process.  section  to be updated once groupings are set

 

1. As a whole, did the presenters seem poised & prepared?                  Yes   /   Somewhat   /   No

Comments/Suggestions: 

 

                      ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 

 

2. Did the presenters use appropriate volume & vocal expression?           Yes   /   Somewhat   /   No    

Comments/Suggestions: 

 

                      ----------------------------------------------------------------------  

 

3. Did the presenters use extemporaneous delivery                                  Yes   /   Somewhat   /   No

(incl. eye contact, gestures, facial expression, talked TO not "at", etc)?         

Comments/Suggestions: 

 

                      ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 

4. Was the presentation's  introduction effective?                                    Yes   /   Somewhat   /    No 

Comments/Suggestions: 

 

                      ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 

5. Was the presentation's conclusion effective?                                        Yes   /   Somewhat   /   No

Comments/Suggestions: 

 

                      ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 

6.[Compr.Listn] Identify at least three(3) of the group’s main persuasive points.  

Comments:

 

                      ----------------------------------------------------------------------

7.[Compr.Listn] Did the presentation make use of the Motivated Sequence? & How could you tell?

Comments: 

 

                      ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 

8.[Critical.Listn] Did the presentation draw clear connections between their CLAIM > to their EVIDENCE > to their WARRANT?  Explain                                       Yes   /   Somewhat   /   No

Comments: 

                      ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 


9.[Critical.Listn] Do you support the group's  proposed company spokesperson?  Yes / Somewhat  / No

Comments/Suggestions: 

 

                      ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 

10. The best thing about this campaign presentation was____________________: 

           
           ----------------------------------------------------------------------  

> USE THIS SPACE TO WRITE OUT YOUR "Challenge Question" {i.e., if you had heard this presentation live, what Shark Tank kind of question would you have asked them?

 

 
 
 

===========================================================================

 

F'21 TEAMS

AA1-plnr:DrDsh_Scott_&_Fabio_&_Kwame_+_Bharath_&_Justin_&_Mark_ (--->) each person: PEER EVALUATION = >> _(Uber)  GROUP 3

AA2-plnr:FB/Meta _Aidan_&_Declan_&_Zak_+_Chris_&_Bowen_&_Joe> (---->) each person:PEER EVALUATION = >> _(DrDsh)_  GROUP  1

AA3-plnr:Uber_Matt_&_Alex_&_Paul_+_Darlene_&_Kennedie_&_Gabby_ (---->_)each person:PEER EVALUATION =>> _(FB/Meta)_GROUP 2

 


plnr  
   
   
   
   
   
   
   



**F:21= View presentations  & use the form to record comments & scores.
 










 

 

 

 

FYI 

How to Record a group segment in advance (for inclusion in the live presentation : (needs to be updated)

HOW TO RECORD YOUR TEAM PRESENTATION:  two multiple camera recording options:
1 - via the Microsoft Stream function in MS Teams. Upload finalized video to Launchpad.{into  "Video Assessment - Grp Competitive Campaign Presentations"}

2- via the multiple camera Video Assessment function directly in Launchpad. {into  "Video Assessment - Grp Competitive Campaign Presentations"}

Both options require one person to serve as the "meeting convener/organizer." That person starts the meeting & recording & admits the other team members.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 REVIEW- HOW TO SUBMIT YOUR TEAM PRESENTATION: Video record via LaunchPad – as was done for the S'21 Selective-1 presentations. You can record directly into LaunchPad or can prerecord & upload it there.  

 In other words, You can record it directly into  the LaunchPad  app or , if you created  a separate videofile of your Presentation ( e,g, via MS Teams) , you can upload that into the same spot.

Note: The Final Template page needs to be submitted in its own slot, also within LaunchPad

Note: Any slide decks already will be integrated into the video presentation so separate upload is not necessary.

Note:  If you know how & someone has a double monitor set up, you can even try showing the slides as a minimized screen. IN ORDER TO GRADE THESE PRESENTATIONS ACCURATELY, it's important that all of the presenters can be  clearly seen & heard.