►VIDEO CRITIQUE FORM ◄ ver 3a.3
< Based on the classroom Videorecorded Presentation >
To be returned via e-mail >Due within 1 week of presentation< [special due date for COMM2625]
[NOTE: you can use
the COPY & PASTE functions to transfer the form below into an e-mail
message window or into a document attachment. Then you will be able to fill in the
answers & e-mail me your submission. Edit fonts & layouts as necessary.]
* * *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
DIRECTIONS
Answer question 10 with a brief paragraph.
Answer question 11 honestly & objectively using grading criteria similar to Dr. Plummer's .
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
PRESENTATION TOPIC:______________________________________
PRESENTATION DATE: ___________________
1. Does the "image" of yourself that you saw on the
videotape match with the image you thought
you were projecting? Briefly discuss keeping in mind the
difference between INTENTION & IMPACT.
2. How would you describe your use of vocal variety & voice projection in this presentation?
3. Were there any words or sounds which gave you did not articulate clearly or as precisely as you could have? If so, list them:
[ REMINDER:
Articulation = shaping & forming the sounds clearly_
Pronunciation = using the right sounds & stress in the right places]
4. Were there any words which gave you pronunciation difficulty? If so, list them:
5. How (if at all) did you use these parts of your body?
Head:
________Face:_________
Arms:_________
Hands:________
Torso:________
Legs & Feet:___
7. Did you notice anything specific which worked in
your favor for this presentation---and Why?
8. Did you notice any movements, gestures and/or habits that could potentially be distracting to an audience? If so, discuss:
9. Was the presentation truly "audience-centered"? :
in terms of LANGUAGE [vocab & style] ? _______
in terms of EYE CONTACT? _____
in terms of projected "ENERGY & ENTHUSIASM"? ______
in terms of Bodys ORDER OF ORGANIZATION?_______
10. From what you saw & heard on the videorecording, briefly evaluate the level of the "communication competence" of the CONTENT [ e.g. thesis / supporting material] & the STRUCTURAL aspects [e.g. Order -Of-Organization/Intro/Conc] of the presentation. ( remember to use the perspective of "being a listener in your own audience". )
11. GRADE YOUR PRESENTATION: By this point in the course, you have been exposed to a variety of principles for achieving context-based, audience-centered communicator effectiveness. In addition you have observed various communication styles in action; therefore you should now be able to evaluate your own performance objectively according to the criteria of the oral communication field. By applying specific grading criteria similar to Dr. Plummer's, indicate what grade you think is appropriate for your Combo Speech Presentation from the perspective of Audience Effectiveness. [ This does not mean that you will necessarily get that grade. It's a way to further assess your objective understanding of Oral Communication]
last major update: 11/15