Speech Assignment Sheet {THIS DOCUMENT = A "USER'S TECHNICAL MANUAL". IT IS AN EXTRA COMPREHENSIVE & EXTRA LONG INSTRUCTION DOCUMENT } [Be sure to read it in its entirety]. It may be easier to understand if you print it out .
Updated for Fall 2021 / last update = 12/4/21 {correction :date typo}
LS |
Go directly to Groupings (incl. NV side jobs)
Oral Communication (COST1600) - ONLINE
Major Presentation #4: "GroupCast-upload" (Team project) |
a.k.a. Small Group Communication &
Presentation
Communicate!/Mindtap
{ "...an aspect about an aspect about a topic..."} [i.e. get ultra-focused]
misc. shortcuts > the list of Groups LS [click to go directly to list or scroll down] > the Rationales & Objectives [click to go directly to list or scroll down] > the summary of submissions' deadlines [click to go directly to this information or scroll down] > the End Result [click to go directly to list or scroll down] > the planning procedures [click to go directly to this section or scroll down] - including Pre-Planning tasks: Our Two Lists: Our Codes-Of-Conduct + our potential topics > the topic choice guidelines [click to go directly to this section or scroll down] > the preliminary Agenda/Outline worksheet[click to go directly to this document. Copy & paste & adjust fonts/layout as necessary.] > the FINAL Agenda/Outline worksheetF21=OPTIONAL [click to go directly to this document. Copy & paste & adjust fonts/layout as necessary.] > the extra credit Reaction Journal F21=OPTIONAL[click to go directly to this section or scroll down] > Guidelines & "tips" for the 3 Delivery formats [click to go directly to this section or scroll down] > Grading Rubrics: Group / Individual > F21 Segment 3 procedure {to be inserted if time }
|
Summary of key deadlines for deliverables:
10/31/21-11:59pm
__Our 2 Lists
[group task] ( to Prof via email & "cc" all members)
11/7/21-11:59pm Preliminary Agenda/Outline [group task] (to Prof via email & "cc" members)
w/ uploaded video
(optional) Revised Agenda/Outline [group task]
by 11/22/21-11:59pm
Upload of Presentation Video:
Segments 1 & 2 [group task]
12/5/21-11:59pm
(optional) Reaction Journal [individual]
►
by 11/22-11:59pm: upload of
Major Presentation #3 Group podcast .
/ pre-record via Teams or Bongo / upload to TBD by Mon 11/22-11:59
/ / if possible: Followup = live-synchronous Q-&-A \ in TBD class
| see page in Assignments section|
<< This multi-part, document will serve as a
"do-it-yourself" guide for your upcoming group activity. It aims to
provide all the information and guidelines you will need in order to
work in small groups/teams for planning a two part,
Program-Presentation. Within this document you will find the usual
assignment details & rationales as well as a list of the matchups
(groupings). In other words, you should use this assignment
sheet as a user's manual
to guide you & your teammates through
your various tasks. As with all online courses, this unit is being
done as a semi-independent study , and much of your work is being
done outside of the class sessions. This page is
quite
detailed and attempts to answer all questions you might have as you
WORK-IN-GROUPS. Read carefully. It is several
pages long, so you may want to print it out & highlight key points.
You may find that you can figure most things out on your own>> |
{ "...an aspect about an aspect about a topic..."}
[i.e. get ultra-focused]
This assignment gives you
an opportunity to plan,
prepare, &
present
a group
presentation on an important issue or
problem of the day. [See sample topics below.] You probably have completed similar
kinds of activities in other classes; however, for this project, the emphasis is
on learning more about the dynamics of communication in groups rather than
exhaustively analyzing a topic.
In addition, this
presentation is structured to help develop your skills of
focus and
succinctness.
For example, the presentation slots are relatively brief and two different group
presentation modes are required for the video-recorded portion of the project. These specifications provide helpful
practice since most effective communication is direct and listener-centered. (i.e.
focused more on what the listener NEEDS to hear than on what the speaker wants
to say).
GENERAL & SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES
General:
CLO2:
Students will be able to recognize the components of the basic communication
process as they are manifested in public, group, interpersonal, and mass
communication contexts.
CLO 5:
Students will be able to perform appropriate listening behaviors, including the
use of attending, processing, and responding techniques and will recognize the
role of nonverbal communication cues.
CLO 6:
Students will be able to recognize how contextual & culture-based dynamics shape
all factors in the sending and receiving of messages (both verbal and
nonverbal).
Specific:
By working with a small group of classmates (grouping to be arranged by your
professor) to devise, produce & submit a virtual program-type presentation, you
will become a more skilled group participant by understanding & applying the
principles of Chapters 9 & 10.
THE END RESULT
t
Together with your groupmates/teammates, you will plan and complete this project while experiencing & exploring the dynamics & procedures of group & interpersonal communication.
The podcast-type presentation will be pre-recorded (format probably using Microsoft Teams & uploaded to the designated folder in Blackboard) .
The question & answer segment will be done live (i.e. synchronous) on Microsoft Teams (probably during a class session in the week 13/14). This multi-mode structure enables you to experience all 3 of the primary group presentation formats & most of the group competency skills.
See the Mindtap textbook: Chapter 10-5b. "Communicating on your Feet>Speech Assignment> Panel Discussion-The Assignment & "Suggested Format" for a summary of what you will be doing. See below for step-by-step procedural details.
Upload of Presentation video is
due by Mon- 11/22/21
STEPS IN PREPARATION:
Note: this way of learning-by-doing can be challenging
at times because you mostly will be studying group dynamics and processes via a
series of activities-- not just by reading about them in the text and/or lecture
notes.
> step-by-step PROCEDURES & GUIDELINES <<most of these are also mentioned in separate sections above; here they are summarized -listed in chronological order>> |
_item 1. If you haven't already done so, exchange phone numbers & e-mail addresses-- for on & off campus. Also, be aware that you can send group emails to all the group members via the Blackboard email function. Each group can create a Google doc/Wiki or can have its own communication site within the TOOLS section of Blackboard where you can chat, post, & exchange materials. Subchannels have been created in Teams which enables most of these same functions within that platform. |
_item 2. Prior to working on the actual presentation, each group is responsible for discussing, completing & submitting the following document --to be emailed to your Professor no later than _Sun-10/31/21-11:59pm- "- Our Group's 2 lists-" . This is a two(2) part document which should include: a list of
our internal five(5) "Codes-of-Conduct" [procedural, behavioral, &/or ethical
expectations agreed
upon by your group] AND a list of four(4) potential topics
that your group has
brainstormed --based on the topics guidelines for this project. { see TOPICS section below} |
_item 3. After receiving the Professor's feedback on your 2 lists, choose a topic for your group to present in a virtual, podcast-type format. Remember, the topic should be interesting, multifaceted, & "discussable" --and maybe even controversial. Also remember the general principles of topic selection covered earlier in the semester. Review topic guidelines for this semester as discussed above.
[[*Topics are on a "first come/first
served" basis, so reserve your group's topic with me as soon as you decide on
it! ]] |
_item 4. Decide on your discussion approach. Aim for FACT or VALUE or POLICY. (textbook chapter 10 / section 10-3a in Mindtap) [Note: Despite the implications given in your text, Group Discussion Presentations are not always " problem solving" in purpose. Problem Solving can be exciting to discuss and to listen to, but for your topic, it may be more appropriate for your group to (1) to
share information ---or--- (2) to decide on the
worth/value of something ---or--- (3) to decide on a
policy/action-to-be-taken.] |
_item 5 Phrase your "DISCUSSION QUESTION" [note: A "D.Q." serves the same purpose for a group discussion that a Thesis Statement does for an individual speaker]. See your text for examples (Chapter 10). |
_item 6. Complete a group "Preliminary Agenda/Outline" worksheet. Document is linked here &, if possible, a back up copy will be placed in the Course Documents section in Blackboard.
|
_item 7.
Determine the
amount & type of research necessary to complete
Segment 1
of the presentation. Remember,
Segment
1 is based on data & evidence, not opinion. It will be presented as a
series of "mini" Informative, extemporaneous speeches". More details about
Segment 1
are given below in the Specifications
section. |
_item 8. Apply any feedback you receive on the preliminary Agenda/Outline to create a REVISED Agenda/Outline for the group's use. This document should be a group effort. This semester, submission of a final version of the A/O is optional. |
_item 9.
Remember, Group
Presentations differ from individual presentations because they are NOT fully rehearsed in advance. Of course, each group member should rehearse his/her own
individual "mini-informative speech " which constitute
Segment 1;
however, the best way to prepare for
Segments 2 & 3
is to be very familiar with your additional data and evidence.
{segments' details located below in the Specifications section.} {{N.B.:- Allow approximately 5-6 minutes for EACH of these 2 video-recorded parts
of the overall presentation. [
Segment 1 + Segment 2] |
_item 10. Visual/presentation aids are welcome as long as they don't disrupt your timing. |
_item
11.
Chapter 10
includes details about the responsibilities for Leaders/Conveners &
Participants. In addition, this current assignment has several specific
expectations for the person who serves as "Leader-Moderator." These tasks
include but are not limited to: *Ensuring
the completion of the team deliverables (prelim. Agenda/Outline & final
Agenda/Outline & the video-recorded presentation-program); * Double checking that all team
members are aware of their research and presentational responsibilities; *Moderating the discussion flow-
with introductions, transitions and summaries, as necessary; *Maintaining the presentation
timing - per segment & overall *Assigning a technician to monitor the mute/chat/hand
raised functions |
TOPICS:
--1-- Please keep in mind that this activity is designed for learning-through-experiencing more so than it is about covering any given topic in depth. That's why your topic needs to be VERY limited & focused. We are exploring techniques for working and presenting in groups. We are not attempting to achieve definitive solutions of the problems of the world!
--2-- All topics should fall into the general category of "CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES OF-THE-DAY" (some samples listed below) .
Once your group selects its general topic area, then focus in on ...an aspect about an aspect about... the selected topic area. In other words, select a specific aspect of an already limited & focused topic: What happens to Interpersonal Communication skills in a post-pandemic world? , Contemporary Social Justice Movements , Standardized Testing in schools , Charismatic CEO's + Conflicts-of-Interest , Glass ceiling for women & under-represented groups , Outsourcing , The increasingly autonomous/robotic workplace , Interpersonal Skills are (aren't) important for 21st Century success , Business Crisis Management , Media Monopolies , Net Neutrality , Reversing Climate Change Now: the best place to start , Millionaire politicians , Facebook & contemporary hiring policies , Continued gender differences in the workplace , Social Responsibility of Social Media Platforms, etc., etc.}
--3--
NOTE:
Select a
topic where the members do NOT all agree on all points & principles. That way
the differing perspectives to be discussed in
Segments 2
{Panel}
& 3
{Q & A follow-up} will
be more "authentic" and less like playing "devil's advocate." Also, for
greater activism, you may want to approach the topic using the "problem solving"
process outlined in your text, rather than simply using an information-sharing
approach.
SUBMISSIONS
Preliminary
1. "Our
Two Lists": {our groups Codes-of-Conduct +
our list of brainstormed topics }
are due by email no later than
Sun-10/31/21-11:59pm--
(use "cc" to include also all group members).
2.
"Preliminary Agenda/Outline"
Complete & submit
edited
worksheet
by email no later than
Sun 11/7/21-11:59pm.
(use "cc" to include all group members).
Final
Your group's Video-recorded Group Presentation
done in "Podcast" style. Upload by
11/22/21
Optional: submit a Revised
Agenda/Outline. If your group opts to submit an updated Agenda/Outline for
consideration in grading, email it directly to the professor.
► Optional:
REACTION JOURNAL: As an individual
submission, in addition to any collaborative contributions to the group project,
anyone can receive 1--8 extra credit points by submitting a personal, follow-up
journal which chronicles thoughts & reflections about being involved in this
group process.
► If you're interested in this
option, keep a 4-5 entry ongoing journal document on your computer—starting with
the initial meetings. {Each dated entry = 1-2 paragraphs.} Section 10.8 in the Mindtap
textbook provides some ideas you your use for "reflection."
► Within one(1) week of the
completion of the working-in-groups unit, submit your full Reaction Journal as
a single document. Upload to the designated assignment folder in Blackboard. (no
later than
Mon. 12/6/21-
11:59pm)
► This is the only individual
assignment associated with this group presentation project
SPECIFICATIONS (including due
dates reminders)
All group members should
participate equally. It is Everyone's responsibility to make sure all of the
tasks are completed.
Presentations will be
graded based on the quality of two factors: the group's submitted materials
and on the quality of the oral presentation itself. In most cases, everyone in
group receives the same grade. However, if participation levels are obviously
uneven, grades will be based on individual performance instead. Two sets of
rubrics are listed at the bottom of this document.
Summary of key deadlines for deliverables:
10/31/21-11:59pm
__Our 2 Lists
[group task] ( to Prof via email & "cc" all members)
11/7/21-11:59pm Preliminary Agenda/Outline [group task] (to Prof via email & "cc" members)
w/ uploaded video
(optional)
Revised Agenda/Outline [group task]
by 11/22/21-11:59pm
Upload of Presentation Video:
Segments 1 & 2 [group task]
12/5/21-11:59pm
(optional) Reaction Journal
[individual]
Oral
Presentation Format: Each
group has flexibility & creative control in terms of the set up of the actual
presentation (to be done as a psuedo-podcast) However, the following
specifications must be met:
Reminder: deadline to upload presentation video =Mon. -11/22/21
- each video presentation will consist
of two segments {Symposium + Panel}
-the total presentation time (including
both segments) is only 10-15 minutes
-all members need to participate orally
in the presentation; however, everyone does not need to speak in each of the
segments
-
tip: similar to public speaking presentations, it will be more effective to
start with a topic that is limited & focused and then develop a well phrased
CENTRAL IDEA [via your Discussion Question]. Avoid attempting to cover a topic
that is too broad. Also, be as succinct as possible about any background information so that your
presentation time mostly consists of spontaneous discussion & exchange of ideas.
-The segments of the
presentation are structured as follows:
Segment 1 {the Symposium}
[approx. 5-7 minutes] - In turn, selected group members
extemporaneously present OBJECTIVE, INFORMATIVE , BACKGROUND
material based on his/her portion of the research. Because of logistics &/or group size, it
may not be possible for each individual to speak during this
segment. Be creative. |
Segment 2 {the Panel}
[approx.. 5-7 minutes] - Next, the group members will
subjectively & spontaneously interact AMONG themselves - discussing
their respective viewpoints on the topic & supporting their
positions mostly via the researched data that was presented in
Segment 1. This should be as spontaneous as possible. This
free-flowing discussion will be moderated by the group’s selected
leader-moderator. The Moderator may want to designate a monitor to
follow the chat & raised hands icons. |
Segment 3 {the Forum} [
approx..5-7 minutes] - After the rest of the class members
have viewed the presentation videos, during a designated,
subsequent class session, each group
will conduct a questions & answers & comments segment with the
audience members. (similar to a virtual "Call -In" segment) Some audience members will be assigned questioning
roles in advance. This free-flowing discussion also needs to be
moderated to avoid monologues/filibusters. |
Reminder: the Live Q & A (Segment 3/Forum) will occur during the class session on 11/23. Each group will have approximately 10 minutes for its Segment 3. Similar to many online conferences, questions will be asked in two ways:
1 Questioner writes question into the Chat area. /or / 2 - Questioner will raise a virtual hand, & will wait to be given an opportunity to orally ask the question.
Someone in each group should be designated to monitor the chat & the raised hands--not necessarily the person serving as leader/moderator. The Leader/Moderator's responsibility is to faciliate the actual Q & A discussion in order to ensure clarity, internal summaries, balanced participation, & a concluding statement. All the group members are eligile to respond to questions. (Tip: Avoid the urge to have everyone weigh in on each question.)
In advance all class members should view all of the videos-- all are located in Mindtap. However, for this semester (F21):
GROUP 1: should prepare questions to ask grp__3___
GROUP 2: should prepare questions to ask grp__1__
GROUP 3: should prepare questions to ask grp__2__
Written
> "Our Two Lists"
due by Sun-10/31/21 -
11:59pm
> Preliminary
Agenda/Outline via a direct email to the professor. If the above links
don't work, you can go to the Course Documents
section in BlackBoard for the worksheet. Use it as a model: Copy & paste into a
new document & adjust fonts as necessary. Due by Sun-11/7/21-11:59pm
PREPARATION TIPS - RECOMMENDATIONS - RESOURCES
>
As you know, MINDTAP contains several
relevant exercises or action steps, which also will help you understand the
dynamics of working in groups.
>
Presentations will be graded based on
the quality of two factors: the group's submitted materials and on the
quality of the oral presentation itself. In most cases, everyone in group
receives the same grade. However, if members' participation levels are obviously
uneven, grades will be based on individual performance instead.
>Tips on Handling the Multiple
Delivery styles of Group Presentation:
1. SYMPOSIUM
= you are talking TO your audience as well as TO your fellow participants
.[i.e. make your mini-speech extemporaneous & audience centered]
2. PANEL = you are talking TO your fellow participants but you realize the audience is silently listening in, so you are also be talking FOR the listeners.[i.e. as you talk amongst yourselves, still project "E & E" & make volume, language & examples audience-centered.]
i.e. When doing a
"panel" presentation, there is an awareness of an audience even though the
panelists are interacting spontaneously among themselves. If your future
professional experiences ever involve you discussing a topic in front of an
audience- either in-person or virtually, remember you are
not talking directly TO them but you are talking FOR them. Your
goal is to keep your energy & volume projected outward to keep the listeners
motivated to listen even though you are not making eye contact with them.
>Tip:
The presentation is structured in this way
for a reason: SYMPOSIUM (part 1) , PANEL (part 2) , FORUM (part 3) . This
structure enables you to experience all three of the primary group presentation
formats & most of the group competency skills.
-
GROUPS information to be
updated as work in this unit proceeds
|
Members:
Olivia D'Amato & Olivia
DeFilippo & Jakob M. &
Joseline
M.
&
Dylan S.
[video upload due by __11/22/21_] [viewing of one of the classmates' group
video due by
___12/1/21-12:15pm__]
[Live Q & A session is on
___12/1/21___]
EARLY TOPIC RESERVATIONs: _ college athletes_/ financial compensation__ FINAL DISCUSSION QUESTION: "Should college athletes be paid?_"
= a Question -of-
FACT--POLICY
--
VALUE //
"2 Lists" rcvd // prelim A/0
rcvd
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
Group #2 |
Members:
Tim
S.
&
Zahra C.
& Tom F. &
Julia H.
[video upload due by _11/22/21__] [viewing of one of the classmates'
group video due by ___12/1/21-12:15pm__]
[Live Q & A session is on ____12/1/21____]
EARLY TOPIC RESERVATIONs: _standardized testing in schools__ Current DISCUSSION QUESTION: "tbd"
a Question -of-
FACT--POLICY
-- VALUE // "2 Lists"
rcvd // prelim A/0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
Group #3 |
Members: Brea H. & Anthony R. & Katie B. & Miranda M.
[video upload due by
__11/15_____] [viewing of one of the
classmates' group video due by
___12/1/21-12:15pm__]
Live Q & A session is on ______12/1/21___]
EARLY TOPIC RESERVATIONs: __transgendered people in HS sports / minimum wage___ FINAL DISCUSSION QUESTION: "Should transgender people( FtM or MtF specifically) be able to play highschool sports with the gender they identify with? _?"
= a
Question -of- FACT--POLICY
-- VALUE // "2 Lists" rcvd // prelim
A/0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
Group #4
|
Members: __. & ____. & _____ & ---- & _____---. [video upload due by __11/15__] [viewing
of one of the
classmates' group video due by
__11/23____] [Live Q & A session is on
_____11/23______]
EARLY TOPIC RESERVATIONs: _____Vaccines FINAL
DISCUSSION QUESTION: "_______tba________________________"
= a Question -of- FACT-POLICY -VALUE
// "2 Lists"rcvd // prelim A/0
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
Group Presentation Rubrics
These are the items to be assessed in evaluating the
team presentation for the group as a whole. When quality and participation
levels within a group are demonstrably unequal. An Individual Participation
Rubric below will be incorporated to determine separate, individual final grades
for the project.
Team Name: _____________________
Criteria |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
CONTENT
|
Material used was credible, relevant, and
enhanced the presentation |
The material used often was credible, &
relevant but needed more breadth |
Some of the material used was credible &
relevant, but not consistently |
Presentation lacked enough concrete and/or valuable
material.
|
|
COLLABORATION |
Discussants skillfully responded to &
explored each other’s ideas |
Discussants sometimes responded to each
other’s ideas – not consistently |
Uneven quality of participation seemed due to
uneven levels of preparation.
|
Discussants tended to speak in monologues
rather than work from each other’s ideas |
|
ORGANIZATION |
Sequencing of presentation’s elements was interesting and
easy to follow |
Sequencing of presentation’s elements showed
organization but could have used stronger preparation |
Sequencing of presentation’s elements made
sense but were not connected in a may to be clear to the audience. |
Sequencing of the agenda was unclear &/or did
not fit with the central idea |
|
DELIVERY SKILLS |
Presenters were poised, eloquent, clear &
engaged with their teammates as well as the “virtual” audience |
Presenters appeared poised & prepared but
could have been more engaged-especially with the “virtual” audience |
Uneven delivery skills. Some team members did
not seem rehearsed for their segment 1 speeches |
Team members came across as overly casual &
colloquial and non-poised. Minimal preparation |
|
PRODUCTION VALUES |
Team’s choices for “aids” had strong aesthetics &
enhanced the overall presentation. |
Team ‘s choices for “aids were functional but
were not fully integrated into the content. |
Team’s choices for “aids” did not represent best
aesthetic practices or could have been more useful. |
Team’s choices for aids were ineffective
(including needing but not having, or having but not needing) |
|
compilations via E. Plummer 7/2020
Actions |
4 |
3
|
2 |
1 |
Contributes to Team
Meetings |
Helps the team move forward
using critical thinking by articulating the
merits of alternative ideas or proposals. |
Offers some
alternative solutions or courses of action that build on
the ideas of others. |
Offers some
new suggestions which become part of the
work of the group. |
Shares ideas but does not advance
the work of the group. |
Facilitates Contributions
of Other Team Members |
Engages team members in ways that
facilitate their contributions to meetings by both constructively
building upon or synthesizing the contributions of others as well as
noticing when someone is not participating and inviting them to engage. |
Engages team members in ways that
facilitate their contributions to meetings by constructively building
upon or synthesizing the contributions of others. |
Engages team members in ways that
facilitate their contributions to meetings by restating the views of
other team members and/or asking questions for clarification. |
Engages team members by taking
turns and listening to others without interrupting. |
Individual Contributions
Outside of Team
Meetings |
Completes all assigned tasks by
deadline; produces thorough work
that is comprehensive,
and advances the project. Proactively helps other team
members complete their assigned tasks to a similar level of excellence. |
Completes all assigned tasks by
deadline; produces thorough work
that is comprehensive,
and advances the project. |
Completes all assigned tasks by
deadline; produces work
that Adequately meets the criteria of the
project. |
Completes all/most
assigned tasks. |
Fosters Constructive
Team Climate |
Supports a constructive team
climate by doing all of the following: - Treats team members
respectfully by being polite and constructive. - Uses positive vocal
or written tone, facial expressions, and/or nonverbals
to convey a positive attitude about the team and
its work. - Motivates teammates
by expressing confidence about the importance of the task and the team's
ability to accomplish it. - Provides assistance
and/or encouragement to team members. |
Supports a constructive team
climate by doing some of the
following: - Treats team members
respectfully by being polite and constructive. - Uses positive vocal
or written tone, facial expressions, and/or nonverbals
to convey a positive attitude about the team and
its work. - Motivates teammates
by expressing confidence about the importance of the task and the team's
ability to accomplish it. - Provides assistance
and/or encouragement to team members. |
Supports a constructive team
climate by doing any two of
the following: -
Treats team members respectfully by being polite and
constructive. - Uses positive vocal
or written tone, facial expressions, and/or nonverbals
to convey a positive attitude about the team and its work. - Motivates teammates
by expressing confidence about the importance of the task and the team's
ability to accomplish it. - Provides assistance
and/or encouragement to team members. |
Supports a constructive team
climate by doing any one of the following: -Treats team members
respectfully by being polite and constructive. - Uses positive vocal
or written tone, facial expressions, and/or nonverbals
to convey a positive attitude about the team and its work. - Motivates teammates
by expressing confidence about the importance of the task and the team's
ability to accomplish it. - Provides assistance
and/or encouragement to team members. |
Uses Constructive
Conflict Management Techniques |
Addresses destructive conflict
directly and constructively, helping to manage it in a way that
strengthens overall team cohesiveness &
effectiveness |
Identifies and acknowledges
conflict and stays engaged with collaboration &/or
compromise |
Redirects group’s
focus toward common ground, toward
task at hand (away from conflict) |
Passively accepts alternate
viewpoints/ideas/opinions regardless of quality or
appropriateness |
*Adapted from the Teamwork Value Rubric:
Association of American Colleges and Universities / Plummer
Summary of key deadlines for deliverables:
10/31/21-11:59pm
__Our 2 Lists
[group task] ( to Prof via email & "cc" all members) 11/7/21-11:59pm Preliminary Agenda/Outline [group task] (to Prof via email & "cc" members)
w/ uploaded video
(optional) Revised Agenda/Outline [group task] by 11/22/21-11:59pm
Upload of Presentation Video:
Segments 1 & 2 [group task] on 12/1/21 - 12:30-1:45 Segments 3 [ live Forum session in class w/ partial video clips playback] 12/5/21-11:59pm
(optional) Reaction Journal [individual] |
|
. |
last updated 11/21/21