Speech Assignment Sheet {THIS DOCUMENT = A "USER'S TECHNICAL MANUAL".   IT IS AN EXTRA COMPREHENSIVE  & EXTRA LONG INSTRUCTION DOCUMENT } [Be sure to read it in its entirety]. It may be easier to understand if you print it out .

 

 Updated for Fall  2021 / last update = 12/4/21 {correction :date typo}

     LS

        Go directly to  Groupings (incl. NV side jobs)       

 

Oral Communication (COST1600) - ONLINE

Major Presentation #4: "GroupCast-upload" (Team project)

 a.k.a. Small Group Communication & Presentation

    Communicate!/Mindtap -15th ed..


         

              { "...an aspect about an aspect about a topic..."} [i.e. get ultra-focused]

 

 

 misc. shortcuts

> the list of Groups LS   [click to go directly  to list or scroll down] 

> the Rationales & Objectives    [click to go directly  to list or scroll down] 

> the summary of submissions' deadlines  [click to go directly to this information  or scroll down] 

> the End Result   [click to go directly  to list or scroll down]

> the planning procedures [click to go directly  to this section or scroll down]

       - including Pre-Planning tasks: Our Two Lists: Our Codes-Of-Conduct + our potential topics 

> the topic choice guidelines  [click to go directly  to this section or scroll down]

> the preliminary Agenda/Outline worksheet[click to go directly to this document. Copy & paste & adjust fonts/layout as necessary.]

> the FINAL Agenda/Outline worksheetF21=OPTIONAL [click to go directly to this  document. Copy & paste & adjust fonts/layout as necessary.]

> the extra credit Reaction Journal F21=OPTIONAL[click to go directly  to this section or scroll down]

> Guidelines & "tips" for the 3 Delivery formats [click to go directly to this section or scroll down]

> Grading Rubrics: Group  /  Individual

> F21 Segment 3 procedure {to be inserted if time }

 


 


 

Summary of key deadlines for deliverables: F'21 version

     10/31/21-11:59pm               __Our 2 Lists [group task] ( to Prof via email & "cc" all members)

     11/7/21-11:59pm                  Preliminary Agenda/Outline [group task] (to Prof  via email & "cc" members)

     w/ uploaded video              (optional) Revised Agenda/Outline [group task]

     by 11/22/21-11:59pm            Upload of Presentation Video: Segments 1 & 2 [group task] Mindtap/Bongo [ https://help.cengage.com/mindtap/mt-student/upload-video.html]

     12/5/21-11:59pm                (optional) Reaction Journal  [individual] (to Prof  via email )

 

 

by 11/22-11:59pm: upload of

Major Presentation #3  Group podcast . / pre-record via Teams or Bongo / upload to TBD by Mon 11/22-11:59 / / if possible: Followup = live-synchronous Q-&-A \  in TBD class | see page in Assignments section|


 


<< This multi-part, document will serve as a "do-it-yourself" guide for your upcoming group activity. It aims to provide all the information and guidelines you will need in order to work in small groups/teams for planning a two part, Program-Presentation. Within this document you will find the usual assignment details & rationales as well as a list of the matchups (groupings).  In other words, you should use this assignment sheet as a user's manual to guide you & your teammates through your various tasks. As with all online courses, this unit is being done as a semi-independent study , and much of your work is being done outside of the class sessions.  This page is quite detailed and attempts to answer all questions you might have as you WORK-IN-GROUPS.   Read carefully.  It is several pages long, so you may want to print it out & highlight key points.  You may find that you can figure most things out on your own>>

RATIONALES:

            { "...an aspect about an aspect about a topic..."} [i.e. get ultra-focused]

This assignment gives you an opportunity to plan, prepare, & present a group presentation on an important issue or problem of the day. [See sample topics below.] You probably have completed similar kinds of activities in other classes; however, for this project, the emphasis is on learning more about the dynamics of communication in groups rather than exhaustively analyzing a topic.

In addition, this presentation is structured to help develop your skills of focus and succinctness.   For example, the presentation slots are relatively brief and two different group presentation modes are required for the video-recorded portion of the project.  These specifications provide helpful practice since most effective communication is direct and listener-centered. (i.e. focused more on what the listener NEEDS to hear than on what the speaker wants to say).

 


 

GENERAL & SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES

General:

CLO2: Students will be able to recognize the components of the basic communication process as they are manifested in public, group, interpersonal, and mass communication contexts.

CLO 5:  Students will be able to perform appropriate listening behaviors, including the use of attending, processing, and responding techniques and will recognize the role of nonverbal communication cues.

CLO 6: Students will be able to recognize how contextual & culture-based dynamics shape all factors in the sending and receiving of messages (both verbal and nonverbal). 

 

Specific: By working with a small group of classmates (grouping to be arranged by your professor)  to devise, produce & submit a virtual program-type presentation, you will become a more skilled group participant by understanding & applying the principles of Chapters 9 & 10.

 The ability to Work-in-Groups is essential for many contexts of contemporary society--particularly in your major. It is likely that you will be assigned group projects /presentations as part of your major's competency requirements. This form of Oral Communication blends informing, persuading, and interpersonal interaction.  The structure of this particular, multifaceted speaking assignment will immerse you directly into the experience so you can learn about the process while actually doing it.  Interestingly, it's the interpersonal side of communication [ a.k.a. the "soft skills" ]  that most businesses & corporations are referencing when say they are seeking employees with good communication skills. 


THE END RESULT t

          Together with your groupmates/teammates, you will plan and complete this project while experiencing & exploring the dynamics & procedures of group & interpersonal communication.


STEPS IN PREPARATION:

Note: this way of learning-by-doing can be challenging at times because you mostly will be studying group dynamics and processes via a series of activities-- not just by reading about them in the text and/or lecture notes.

    First, carefully read Chapters  9 & 10  [15ed]  They will help you understand the key group communication principles & characteristics of Healthy Groups (Chapter item 9.2). Also review the several relevant sections in Chapter 9 about virtual groups and virtual presentations, There are some related documents & a free-standing slide show in Blackboard that also clarify what it means to work effectively in groups.

added 10/10/20: View two sample videos of two ways to deliver in-person group presentations - located in a folder at the end of Chapter 9 in MindTap.

 

> step-by-step  PROCEDURES & GUIDELINES   <<most of these are also mentioned in separate sections above; here they are summarized -listed in chronological  order>> 
 
_item 1. If you haven't already done so, exchange phone numbers & e-mail addresses-- for on & off campus.  Also, be aware that you can send group emails to all the group members via the Blackboard email function. Each group can create a Google doc/Wiki or can have its own communication site within the TOOLS section of Blackboard where you can chat, post, & exchange materials. Subchannels have been created in Teams which enables most of these same functions  within that platform.
 

_item 2. Prior to working on the actual presentation, each group is responsible for discussing, completing & submitting the following document --to be emailed to your Professor no later than _Sun-10/31/21-11:59pm-  "- Our Group's 2 lists-" .

This is a two(2) part document which  should include:  a list of  our internal five(5) "Codes-of-Conduct" [procedural, behavioral, &/or ethical expectations  agreed upon by your group] AND a list of  four(4) potential topics that your group has brainstormed --based on the topics guidelines for this project. { see TOPICS section below}

 

_item 3. After receiving  the Professor's feedback on your 2 lists, choose a topic for your group to present in a virtual, podcast-type format.  Remember, the topic should be interesting, multifaceted, & "discussable" --and maybe even controversial. Also remember the general principles of topic selection covered earlier in the semester.   Review topic guidelines for this semester as discussed above.  

[[*Topics are on a "first come/first served" basis, so reserve your group's topic with me as soon as you decide on it! ]]  

 

_item 4. Decide on your discussion approach.  Aim for  FACT or  VALUE  or POLICY. (textbook chapter 10 / section 10-3a in Mindtap)   [Note: Despite the implications  given in your text, Group Discussion Presentations are not always " problem solving" in purpose.  Problem Solving can be exciting to discuss and to listen to, but for your topic, it may be more appropriate for your group to

 (1)  to share information ---or---  (2) to decide on the worth/value of something ---or--- (3) to decide on a policy/action-to-be-taken.]  

 
_item 5 Phrase your "DISCUSSION QUESTION" [note:  A  "D.Q." serves the same purpose for a group discussion that a Thesis Statement does for an individual speaker].  See your text for examples (Chapter 10).
 

_item 6. Complete  a group "Preliminary Agenda/Outline" worksheet. Document  is linked here &, if possible, a back up copy will be placed in the Course Documents section in Blackboard.

  •  Submit via e-mail & "cc" all members in your group.

  • Due No later than Sun-11/7/21-11:59pm__ but sooner is better. Use the worksheet as a template (Copy & paste it into a new document but eliminate the background. Adjust fonts as needed)  This submission will provide insight on the group's progress.

 
_item 7. Determine the amount & type of research necessary to complete Segment 1 of the presentation. Remember, Segment 1 is based on data & evidence, not opinion. It will be presented as a series of "mini" Informative, extemporaneous speeches".  More details about Segment 1 are given below in the Specifications section.
 

_item  8. Apply any feedback you receive on the preliminary Agenda/Outline to create a REVISED Agenda/Outline for the group's use.   This document should be a group effort. This semester, submission of a final version of the A/O is optional.  

 
_item 9. Remember, Group Presentations differ from individual presentations because they are NOT fully rehearsed in advance. Of course, each group member should rehearse his/her own individual "mini-informative speech " which constitute Segment 1;  however, the best way to prepare for Segments 2  & 3  is to be very familiar with your additional data and evidence.  {segments' details located below in the Specifications section.} {{N.B.:- Allow approximately 5-6 minutes for EACH of these 2 video-recorded parts of the overall  presentation. [ Segment 1 + Segment 2]
 

_item 10. Visual/presentation aids are welcome as long as they don't disrupt your timing.  

 

 _item 11.  Chapter 10 includes details about the responsibilities for Leaders/Conveners  & Participants. In addition, this current assignment has several specific expectations for the person who serves as "Leader-Moderator." These tasks include but are not limited to:

 *Ensuring the completion of the team deliverables (prelim. Agenda/Outline & final Agenda/Outline & the video-recorded presentation-program);

* Double checking that all team members are aware of their research and presentational responsibilities;

*Moderating the discussion flow- with introductions, transitions and summaries, as necessary;

*Maintaining the presentation timing -  per segment & overall

*Assigning a technician to monitor the mute/chat/hand raised functions [ especially during Segments 2 & 3]

 
 
 

 

 

 

 


TOPICS:

  --1-- Please keep in mind that this activity is designed for learning-through-experiencing more so than it is about covering any given topic in depth. That's why your topic needs to be VERY limited & focused.  We are exploring techniques for working and presenting in groups. We are not attempting to achieve definitive solutions of the problems of the world!

 --2-- All topics should fall into the general category of "CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES OF-THE-DAY" (some samples listed below) .

Once your group selects its general topic area,  then focus in on   ...an aspect about an aspect about... the selected  topic area.   In other words,  select a specific aspect of an already limited & focused topic:  What happens to Interpersonal Communication skills in a post-pandemic world?Contemporary Social Justice Movements  ,  Standardized Testing in schools  ,   Charismatic CEO's + Conflicts-of-Interest  ,  Glass ceiling for women & under-represented groups  ,  Outsourcing   ,  The increasingly autonomous/robotic workplace ,   Interpersonal Skills are (aren't) important for 21st Century  success  ,  Business Crisis Management Media Monopolies ,  Net Neutrality , Reversing Climate Change Now: the best place to start ,  Millionaire politicians  ,   Facebook & contemporary hiring policies  ,   Continued gender differences in the workplace  Social Responsibility of Social Media Platforms, etc., etc.}

added 10/10/20: -Also, if needed, you can refer to  the Template-Group Speech/Topic Generation methods within the Outline Builder App in Mindtap for techniques on brainstorming Group topics.

--3-- NOTE:  Select a topic where the members do NOT all agree on all points & principles. That way the differing perspectives to be discussed in Segments 2  {Panel} & 3 {Q & A follow-up}  will be more "authentic" and less like playing "devil's advocate."   Also, for greater activism, you may want to approach the topic using the "problem solving" process outlined in your text, rather than simply using an information-sharing approach.

 


SUBMISSIONS

          Preliminary

1. "Our Two Lists":  {our groups Codes-of-Conduct + our list of brainstormed topics } are due by email no later than Sun-10/31/21-11:59pm-- (use "cc" to include also all group members). Alternate delivery method = create a document in your Teams' subchannel.

2. "Preliminary Agenda/Outline"  Complete & submit edited worksheet  by email no later than Sun 11/7/21-11:59pm. (use "cc" to include all group members). Alternate delivery method = create a document in your Teams' subchannel.

 

          Final

Your group's Video-recorded Group Presentation done in "Podcast" style. Upload by 11/22/21 Pre-record via Teams or Bongo . Location for upload  = Bongo/Mindtap https://help.cengage.com/mindtap/mt-student/upload-video.html

Optional: submit a Revised Agenda/Outline. If your group opts to submit an updated Agenda/Outline for consideration in grading, email it directly to the professor.

 

Follow-up

► Optional: REACTION JOURNAL: As an individual submission, in addition to any collaborative contributions to the group project, anyone can receive 1--8 extra credit points by submitting a personal, follow-up journal which chronicles thoughts & reflections about being involved in this group process.

► If you're interested in this option, keep a 4-5 entry ongoing journal document on your computer—starting with the initial meetings. {Each dated entry = 1-2 paragraphs.} Section 10.8 in the  Mindtap textbook provides some ideas you your use for "reflection."

► Within one(1) week of the completion of the working-in-groups unit,  submit your full Reaction Journal as a single document. Upload to the designated assignment folder in Blackboard. (no later than Mon. 12/6/21- 11:59pm) . Alternate delivery  = direct email to Professor.

► This is the only individual assignment associated with this group presentation project. All other items = group/team tasks.

 


SPECIFICATIONS  (including due dates reminders)

All group members should participate equally.  It is Everyone's responsibility to make sure all of the tasks are completed.

Presentations will be graded based on the quality of two factors: the group's submitted materials and on the quality of the oral presentation itself. In most cases, everyone in group receives the same grade. However, if participation levels are obviously uneven, grades will be based on individual performance instead. Two sets of rubrics are listed at the bottom of this document.

 

Summary of key deadlines for deliverables: F'21 version

     10/31/21-11:59pm               __Our 2 Lists [group task] ( to Prof via email & "cc" all members)

     11/7/21-11:59pm                  Preliminary Agenda/Outline [group task] (to Prof  via email & "cc" members)

     w/ uploaded video              (optional) Revised Agenda/Outline [group task]

     by 11/22/21-11:59pm            Upload of Presentation Video: Segments 1 & 2 [group task] Mindtap/Bongo [ https://help.cengage.com/mindtap/mt-student/upload-video.html]

     12/5/21-11:59pm                (optional) Reaction Journal  [individual] (to Prof  via email )

Oral

Presentation Format: Each group has flexibility & creative control in terms of the set up of the actual presentation (to be done as a psuedo-podcast) However, the following specifications must be met:

Reminder: deadline to upload presentation video =Mon. -11/22/21

         - each video presentation will consist of two segments {Symposium + Panel}

         -the total presentation time (including both segments) is only 10-15 minutes

          -all members need to participate orally in the presentation; however, everyone does not need to speak in each of the segments

          - tip: similar to public speaking presentations, it will be more effective to start with a topic that is limited & focused and then develop a well phrased CENTRAL IDEA [via your Discussion Question]. Avoid attempting to cover a topic that is too broad. Also, be as succinct as possible about any background information so that your presentation time mostly consists of spontaneous discussion & exchange of ideas.  

 

    -The segments of the presentation are structured as follows:  

Segment 1  {the Symposium} [approx. 5-7 minutes] -  In turn, selected  group members extemporaneously present OBJECTIVE,  INFORMATIVE , BACKGROUND material based on his/her portion of the research.  

Because of logistics &/or group size, it may not be possible for each individual to speak during this segment. Be creative.

Segment  2 {the Panel} [approx.. 5-7 minutes] - Next, the group members will subjectively & spontaneously interact AMONG themselves - discussing  their respective viewpoints on the topic & supporting their positions mostly via the researched data that was presented in Segment 1. This should be as spontaneous as possible. This free-flowing discussion will be moderated by the group’s selected leader-moderator. The Moderator may want to designate a monitor to follow the chat & raised hands icons.

 

Segment  3  {the Forum} [ approx..5-7 minutes]  - After the rest of the class members have viewed the presentation videos, during a designated, subsequent class session, each group will conduct a questions & answers & comments segment with the audience members. (similar to a virtual "Call -In" segment)  Some audience members will be assigned questioning roles in advance.   This free-flowing discussion also needs to be moderated to avoid monologues/filibusters. 

         

Tentative/F21: Procedure for Segment 3:

Reminder: the Live Q & A (Segment 3/Forum) will occur during the class session on 11/23. Each group will have approximately 10 minutes for  its Segment 3.  Similar to many online conferences, questions will be asked in two ways: 

1 Questioner writes question into the Chat area. /or /  2 - Questioner will raise a virtual hand, & will wait to be given an opportunity to orally ask the question.

Someone in each group  should be designated to monitor the chat & the raised hands--not necessarily the  person serving as leader/moderator. The Leader/Moderator's responsibility is to faciliate the actual Q & A discussion in order to ensure clarity, internal summaries, balanced participation, & a concluding statement.  All the group members are eligile to respond to questions. (Tip: Avoid the urge to have everyone weigh in on each question.) 

In advance all class members should view all of the videos-- all are located in Mindtap. However,  for this semester (F21):

 

GROUP 1: should prepare questions to ask    grp__3___

GROUP 2: should prepare questions to ask     grp__1__

GROUP 3: should prepare questions to ask     grp__2__

 

Written

> "Our Two Lists" due by Sun-10/31/21 - 11:59pm 

> Preliminary Agenda/Outline via a direct email to the professor.  If the above links don't work, you can go to the Course Documents section in BlackBoard for the worksheet. Use it as a model: Copy & paste into a new document & adjust fonts as necessary.  Due by  Sun-11/7/21-11:59pm     

 


 

PREPARATION TIPS - RECOMMENDATIONS - RESOURCES

> As you know, MINDTAP contains several relevant exercises or action steps, which also will help you understand the dynamics of working in groups.  

> Presentations will be graded based on the quality of two factors: the group's submitted materials and on the quality of the oral presentation itself. In most cases, everyone in group receives the same grade. However, if members'  participation levels are obviously uneven, grades will be based on individual performance instead.

>Tips on Handling the Multiple Delivery styles of Group Presentation:

1. SYMPOSIUM  =  you are talking TO your audience as well as TO your fellow participants .[i.e. make your mini-speech extemporaneous & audience centered]

2. PANEL =  you are talking TO your fellow participants but you realize the audience is silently listening in, so you are also be talking FOR the listeners.[i.e. as you talk amongst yourselves, still project "E & E" & make volume, language & examples audience-centered.]

i.e. When doing a "panel" presentation, there is an awareness of an audience even though the panelists are interacting spontaneously among themselves. If your future professional experiences ever involve you discussing a topic in front of an audience- either in-person or virtually, remember you are not talking directly TO them but you are talking FOR them.  Your goal is to keep your energy & volume projected outward to keep the listeners  motivated to listen  even though you are not making eye contact with them.

 3. FORUM  =  {Q & A} as part of your group. you are talking WITH your audience. They are the ones asking the questions and directing the discussion. [ i.e. accommodate their interests but weave in reinforcement of your own central idea]

 

>Tip: The presentation is structured in this way for a reason:   SYMPOSIUM (part 1) , PANEL (part 2) , FORUM (part 3) . This structure enables you to experience all three of the primary group presentation formats & most of the group competency skills.



  

- GROUPS  information to be updated as work in this unit proceeds

 Group #1

vid avail in MT access updated?

 

Members:  Olivia D'Amato  &  Olivia DeFilippo  & Jakob M.  &  Joseline M.  & Dylan S.

 

[video upload due by __11/22/21_] _11:59pm_

[viewing of one of the classmates' group video due by ___12/1/21-12:15pm__] prep questions for grp_3's video presentation

 

[Live Q & A session is on ___12/1/21___]   

  

EARLY TOPIC RESERVATIONs: _ college athletes_/ financial compensation__

 

 FINAL DISCUSSION QUESTION:  "Should college athletes be paid?_"

 

 

= a  Question -of- FACT--POLICY -- VALUE    //      "2 Lists" rcvd    //       prelim  A/0  rcvd  //  vid upload  complete

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SIDE JOB:

GROUP 1 =  MINDTAP video: "Recognizing Nonverbal Cues" >> submit FIRST QUESTION : Nonverbal communication serves many functions, including substituting, accenting, regulating, completing, and contradicting. Identify examples of each function in one or both of the scenarios. [TBDIC]

Group #2

vid avail in MT access updated?

 

Members:    Tim S.   &   Zahra C.  &   Tom F.  &  Julia H.

 

 [video upload due by _11/22/21__]  = _11:59pm

[viewing of one of the classmates' group video due by ___12/1/21-12:15pm__]  prep questions for grp_1's video presentation  access might be available. Email Dr. Plummer if you need a back up link

 

[Live Q & A session is on ____12/1/21____]  

 

 

 

EARLY TOPIC RESERVATIONs: _standardized testing in schools__

 

 Current  DISCUSSION QUESTION:  "tbd"

 

 a  Question -of- FACT--POLICY -- VALUE    //      "2 Lists" rcvd    //       prelim  A/0    // vid upload completed

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SIDE JOB:

GROUP 2 =  MINDTAP video: "Recognizing Nonverbal Cues" >> submit SECOND QUESTION: Describe specific ways in which Kim's nonverbal behavior differs in each scenario. Pay attention to her body orientation, posture, gestures, facial expression, and paralanguage. [TBDIC]

Group #3

vid avail in MT

 

Members:  Brea H.    &    Anthony R.   &    Katie B.    &    Miranda M.

 

  [video upload due by __11/15_____]  = __:__

[viewing of one of the classmates' group video due by ___12/1/21-12:15pm__]  prep questions for grp 2's video presentation - access might be available. Email Dr. Plummer if you need a back up link

 

Live Q & A session is on ______12/1/21___]   

 

EARLY TOPIC RESERVATIONs: __transgendered people in HS sports / minimum wage___

 

 FINAL DISCUSSION QUESTION:  "Should transgender people( FtM or MtF specifically) be able to play highschool sports with the gender they identify with? _?"

 

 

= a  Question -of- FACT--POLICY -- VALUE    //      "2 Lists" rcvd    //       prelim A/0 rcvd // vid upload completed

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SIDE JOB:

GROUP 3 =  MINDTAP video: "Recognizing Nonverbal Cues" >> submit THIRD QUESTION: Nonverbal communication is ambiguous. Identify nonverbal behaviors of Kim (in each version of the scenario) that could be interpreted in more than one way. [TBDIC]

Group #4

vid avail in MT

 

Members: __.  & ____.  & _____ &   ----   &    _____---.

 

 [video upload due by __11/15__]  = 12:30

[viewing of one of the classmates' group video due by __11/23____] prep questions for grp__1___

[Live Q & A session is on _____11/23______]   

 

 

EARLY TOPIC RESERVATIONs: _____Vaccines

 

 FINAL DISCUSSION QUESTION: "_______tba________________________"

 

= a  Question -of- FACT-POLICY -VALUE   //      "2 Lists"rcvd      //       prelim  A/0  rcvd // vid in MT

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SIDE JOB:

GROUP 4 =  MINDTAP video: "Teamwork: Bill's Bad Attitude" >> submit SECOND QUESTION: Identify nonverbal behaviors that express relational level meanings of communication. What aspects of team members' nonverbal communication expresses liking or disliking, responsiveness or lack of responsiveness, and power?

 


  

Group Presentation Rubrics

 

These are the items to be assessed in evaluating the team presentation for the group as a whole. When quality and participation levels within a group are demonstrably unequal. An Individual Participation Rubric below will be incorporated to determine separate, individual final grades for the project.

 

Team Name: _____________________

 

Criteria

4

3

2

1

 

CONTENT

 

Material used was credible, relevant, and enhanced the presentation

The material used  often was credible, & relevant but needed more breadth

Some of the material used was credible & relevant, but not consistently

Presentation lacked enough concrete and/or valuable material.

 

 

COLLABORATION

Discussants skillfully responded to & explored each other’s ideas

Discussants sometimes responded to each other’s ideas – not consistently

Uneven quality of participation seemed due to uneven levels of preparation.

Discussants tended to speak in monologues rather than work from each other’s ideas

 

ORGANIZATION

Sequencing of

presentation’s elements was interesting and easy to follow

Sequencing of presentation’s elements showed organization but could have used stronger preparation

Sequencing of presentation’s elements made sense but were not connected in a may to be clear to the audience.

Sequencing of the agenda was unclear &/or did not fit with the central idea

 

DELIVERY SKILLS

Presenters were poised, eloquent, clear  & engaged with their teammates as well as the “virtual” audience

Presenters appeared poised & prepared but could have been more engaged-especially with the “virtual” audience

Uneven delivery skills. Some team members did not seem rehearsed for their segment 1 speeches

Team members  came across as overly casual & colloquial and non-poised. Minimal preparation

 

PRODUCTION

VALUES

Team’s choices for “aids” had strong aesthetics & enhanced the overall presentation.  

Team ‘s choices for “aids were functional but  were not fully integrated into the content.

Team’s choices for “aids” did not represent best aesthetic practices or could have been more useful.

Team’s choices for aids were ineffective (including needing but not having, or having but not needing)

 

compilations via E. Plummer 7/2020


 Teamwork VALUE Rubric ( Individual)

Actions

4

               3             

2

1

Contributes to Team Meetings

Helps the team move forward using critical thinking by articulating the merits of alternative ideas or proposals.

Offers some alternative solutions or courses of action that build on the ideas of others.

Offers some new suggestions which become part of the  work of the group.

Shares ideas but does not advance the work of the group.

Facilitates Contributions of Other Team Members

Engages team members in ways that facilitate their contributions to meetings by both constructively building upon or synthesizing the contributions of others as well as noticing when someone is not participating and inviting them to engage.

Engages team members in ways that facilitate their contributions to meetings by constructively building upon or synthesizing the contributions of others.

Engages team members in ways that facilitate their contributions to meetings by restating the views of other team members and/or asking questions for clarification.

Engages team members by taking turns and listening to others without interrupting.

Individual Contributions Outside of Team Meetings

Completes all assigned tasks by deadline; produces thorough work that is comprehensive, and advances the project.

Proactively helps other team members complete their assigned tasks to a similar level of excellence.

Completes all assigned tasks by deadline; produces thorough work that is comprehensive, and advances the project.

 

Completes all assigned tasks by deadline; produces work that

Adequately meets the criteria of the project.

 

Completes all/most  assigned tasks.

Fosters Constructive Team Climate

Supports a constructive team climate by doing all of the following:

- Treats team members respectfully by being polite and constructive.

- Uses positive vocal or written tone, facial expressions, and/or nonverbals to convey a positive attitude about the team and its work.

- Motivates teammates by expressing confidence about the importance of the task and the team's ability to accomplish it.

- Provides assistance and/or encouragement to team members.

Supports a constructive team climate by doing some of the following:

- Treats team members respectfully by being polite and constructive.

- Uses positive vocal or written tone, facial expressions, and/or nonverbals to convey a positive attitude about the team and its work.

- Motivates teammates by expressing confidence about the importance of the task and the team's ability to accomplish it.

- Provides assistance and/or encouragement to team members.

Supports a constructive team climate by doing  any two of the following:

 - Treats team members respectfully by being polite and constructive.

- Uses positive vocal or written tone, facial expressions, and/or nonverbals to convey a positive attitude about the team and its work.

- Motivates teammates by expressing confidence about the importance of the task and the team's ability to accomplish it. 

- Provides assistance and/or encouragement to team members.

Supports a constructive team climate by doing any one of the following:

-Treats team members respectfully by being polite and constructive.

- Uses positive vocal or written tone, facial expressions, and/or nonverbals to convey a positive attitude about the team and its work.

- Motivates teammates by expressing confidence about the importance of the task and the team's ability to accomplish it. 

- Provides assistance and/or encouragement to team members.

Uses Constructive Conflict

Management Techniques

Addresses destructive conflict directly and constructively, helping to manage it in a way that strengthens overall team cohesiveness & effectiveness

Identifies and acknowledges conflict and stays engaged with collaboration &/or compromise

Redirects group’s  focus toward common ground, toward task at hand (away from conflict)

Passively accepts alternate viewpoints/ideas/opinions regardless of quality or appropriateness

*Adapted from the Teamwork Value Rubric: Association of American Colleges and Universities / Plummer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 

 

 



                                                                                       

Summary of key deadlines for deliverables: F'21 version

     10/31/21-11:59pm               __Our 2 Lists [group task] ( to Prof via email & "cc" all members)

     11/7/21-11:59pm                  Preliminary Agenda/Outline [group task] (to Prof  via email & "cc" members)

     w/ uploaded video              (optional) Revised Agenda/Outline [group task]

     by 11/22/21-11:59pm            Upload of Presentation Video: Segments 1 & 2 [group task] Mindtap/Bongo [ https://help.cengage.com/mindtap/mt-student/upload-video.html]

    on 12/1/21 - 12:30-1:45         Segments 3 [ live Forum  session in class w/ partial video clips playback]

 12/5/21-11:59pm                (optional) Reaction Journal  [individual] (to Prof  via email )

  .

 

 





 



 

last updated 11/21/21