Updated  Version  S07 / abbreviated, preliminary Recommendations   added 3/23/07

 

TEAM ANALYSIS GROUPINGS:

 

S07-1 work:       Dave P.   /  Frank A.   /    Joely M.   /    Alecia P.  /  Jeff W.

n.a. for this semester:S05-2 wk/C-frnd: Jordan B   /  TJ   /   Veronika G.

S07-3  frnd/Fam: Rec       Amanda S.     /     Ray G.     /   Philip M.   /  Kristyn O.

n.a. for this semester::S05-4a & b C-frnd:   Anish K     /    CJ   /    Tre

S07-5  FRND:   Rec      Chris B.   /    Matt B.    /   Kirsten F.   /   Matt S.  /  

S07-6  C-frnd/rom:    Rec        Cynthia  D.  /  Josh F.    /    Steve M.   /   Amanda D.

S07-7  rom:   Rec        Erin B.    /    Kris C.  /   Ashley H.    /    Ryan O.  / Chris S.

 

S05-8*  wrk2:      “Negotiating workplace landmines” EXTRA  CREDIT OPPORTUNITY for any individual    

 

=================================================================

Several interesting cases were received but all could not be included for this activity.

 

The team discussions & debriefings will occur in class throughout the next 2-3 weeks. Some hard copies of these case studies MAY be distributed in class, but, more likely,  you should prepare yourself by being familiar with your specific case study as indicated above.   The case studies themselves begin below on page 2.  Either scroll down or use the links above. The analysis & debriefing procedures are repeated at the end of this document. We will proceed through the analysis & debriefing steps of the activity as far as we can get by the end of the semester--amidst the Mini Project Reports.

 

#case1

S07-1w   {NOTE: names & some details have been changed &/or paraphrased to preserve anonymity}

 

●From writer’s  perspective,  the Level/Type of this relationship is :_ CHOICE_           

Writer’s  label  for the type of conflict (out of Psuedo, Simple,  or Ego): _ SIMPLE_   but believes other party would say EGO       

Writer’s  label  for the conflict (out of constructive or destructive): _ CONSTRUCTIVE          

Writer’s highest score for personal Conflict Style: “Identifying your Conflict Management Style”- pp. 232-3 

          AVOIDING     /      COMPETING_3   /     ACCOMMODATING    /     COMPROMISING _3_   /      COLLABORATING -

 

   Summary of the problem/ the writer’s analysis/ the goals:

 

     I recently had a conflict with the Faculty Advisor to a student group to which I belong.  The disagreement was brought about by my suggesting a merit-based application process of selecting member students to attend various organizational events.  Previously attendees were chosen by the adviser on an ad-hoc, last minute basis.

 

     To put the new system in place in as fair a way as possible, I requested input from members with the adviser present.  All were in agreement that those interested in representing the group off campus should have an opportunity to apply via an essay.

 

     It seemed that conflict was avoided and that an organized procedure had been put in place.  However, the adviser saw this as a threat to her influence and standing within the group and worked to undermine the procedure.  Sadly, due to the adviser's behavior, the desired changes didn't take place, open communication lost to underhandedness, and bad feelings abound.

 

 

 

 

 HOW CAN THIS CONFLICT BE MANAGED (RESOLVED) NOW ???

Also consider:  how much does the power differential influence the way(s)  this conflict can be resolved?

Also consider:  has/could the type of conflict evolve(d) into as additional type? Should there be any direct (i.e. metacommunicational discussion?

Also consider:   Is there something unusual about the writer’s scores & rankings on conflict management style?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Team’s C.M. Recommendations [ based on material in Chaps 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 (4e)]: (continue onto back if necessary)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


S05-2 wk/ C-frnd   {NOTE: names & some details have been changed &/or paraphrased to preserve anonymity}

 

●From writer’s  perspective, what is the Level/Type of this relationship:_  CLOSE FRIEND/ INTIMATE / CHOICE          

Writer’s  label  for the type of conflict ( Psuedo, Simple,  or Ego): _ PSUEDO 

Writer’s  label  for the conflict (constructive or destructive): _ ________________(was left blank)          

Writer’s highest score for personal Conflict Style: “Identifying your Conflict Management Style”- pp. 232-3 

       AVOIDING    /      COMPETING   /     ACCOMMODATING    /     COMPROMISING _3_  /      COLLABORATING

 

● Summary of the problem/ the writer’s analysis/ the goals: 

            Over the summer my best friend was looking for work for the season and I was previously working at a construction company as head of employees.  Since he was looking for a job,  I decided to help my good friend out and give him job to help him get on his feet.  Everything was going fine for the first month or so until he started missing work for no reason without calling or respecting me at all.  He thought that because we were best friends he could use me and not call in if he would not be arriving.

        I was very angry at the situation and could not believe that he would do this thing to me. I really just yelled at him and did not care about what he thought. I really did not give him the chance to explain himself because I knew he was just being lazy. I almost was on the verge or firing him and did not talk to him for weeks. There was definitely more that I could have done to understand the situation better.

        I did not care about his situation or why he kept missing work.  Also,  I didn’t pay much attention to the non-verbal cues he was giving me, although he  was not talking and seemed sad at work; it could have been something else that was wrong.  There were many things I could have done to make it better and maybe not run into the situation ever again.

 

 HOW COULD THIS CONFLICT HAVE BEEN MANAGED (RESOLVED) EARLIER/MORE EASILY ???  How can similar conflicts between these 2 people be managed in the future???

Also consider:  are there additional sources/types of conflict and additional CM styles operating here?

 

 

 

HOW SHOULD THIS CONFLICT BE MANAGED (RESOLVED) THE NEXT TIME IT COMES UP ???

         Also consider:  are there additional sources/types of conflict and additional CM styles operating here?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TEAM ANALYSIS

<Conflict & Relationships>

 

Together with your partner(s), complete these steps as you analyze the conflict case study that has been given to you. There is also a possibility that you & your partner(s) will get to orally summarize your process & conflict management recommendations. (Beebe,3e)

 

 

 

Team’s C.M. Recommendations [ based on material in Chaps 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 (4e)]: (continue onto back if necessary)

 

● Realize that EGO-conflict exists as well (Friend/Employer feels taken advantage of). Utilize anger defusing techniques such as breathing, avoiding name calling & emotional overstatements, etc.

 

 

● Friend/Employer should plan message before speaking to Friend/Employee.

 

 

● During the face-to-face conflict management encounter, manage the information by DESCRIBING the conflict profucing events & by using effective & empathic listening skills.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


                

S07-3 frnd/fam   {NOTE: names & some details have been changed &/or paraphrased to preserve anonymity}

 

 

●From writer’s  perspective, what is the Level/Type of this relationship:_SIMPLE (sic)
Writer’s  label  for the type of conflict  (Psuedo, Simple,  or Ego): _ PSUEDO          

Writer’s  label  for the conflict (constructive or destructive): _ CONSTRUCTIVE          

Writer’s highest score for personal Conflict Style: “Identifying your Conflict Management Style”- pp. 232-3 

       AVOIDING _4_   /      COMPETING_5_      /     ACCOMMODATING    /     COMPROMISING    /      COLLABORATING

  Summary of the problem/ the writer’s analysis/ the goals:

 

            My relationship issue was with my brother James.  He is my brother and we have always been very close because we have grown up together and spent so much time with each other. My conflict started with him as we got older and we both started to change. He became a much more disciplined focused person and I became a free-wheeling, I-want-to-have-fun person. This started a rift in our relationship as he wanted me to be more focused in school and in life. This was the start of a simple conflict. My strategy when this conflict started was to totally ignore my brother and not listen to anything he had to say with regards to anything. I ignored any wisdom he tried to give me in any facet of life even though I knew he had of a lot of vital advice. I thought my brother was trying to control me in a way , but what he was trying to do was help me be focused and successful in my everyday life. Over the last couple of months I know I would like to improve our relationship and be great friends again.

 

 

 

 

HOW COULD THIS CONFLICT HAVE BEEN MANAGED (RESOLVED) EARLIER/MORE EASILY ??? How can similar conflicts between these 2 people be managed in the future???

Also consider:  are there additional sources/types of conflict and additional CM styles operating here?

               Also consider:   Is there something unusual about the writer’s scores & rankings on conflict management style?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Team’s C.M. Recommendations [ based on material in Chaps 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 (4e)]: (continue onto back if necessary)

 

 

 Handling emotions: Make a conscious decision about being willing to express your desire to rebuild the relationship.

 

 Select a mutually acceptable time & place to discuss the conflict.

 

● Think/Check on what your brother has told you; think of his intentions.  Be sure to realize he was not trying to be controlling.

 

● Use a “win-win” strategy & discuss tiyr priorities in order to make tradeoffs on different issues  ( i.e. collaborate so that together you can come up with changes &/or concessions  that are mutually satisfactory + Dr. Plummer’s paraphrase )

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


S05-4a & b {NOTE: names & some details have been changed &/or paraphrased to preserve anonymity}

a - ●From writer’s  perspective, what is the Level/Type of this relationship:_ CLOSE FRIEND___     

     Writer’s  label  for the type of conflict as Psuedo, Simple,  or Ego: _ PSUEDO___            

     Writer’s  label  for the conflict as constructive or destructive: _   CONSTRUCTIVE                     

     Writer’s highest score for personal Conflict Style: “Identifying your Conflict Management Style”- pp. 232-3 

               AVOIDING _4_   /      COMPETING   /     ACCOMMODATING    /     COMPROMISING    /      COLLABORATING

       Summary of the problem/ the writer’s analysis/ the goals:

        My freshman year of college, I met a person, who has grown to be one of my best friends. The conflict that we have, deals mostly with his attitude and the way that he deals with other people. This friend has a difficult time having relationships because he has an extremely negative outlook on life. For instance: He has a girlfriend with admitted jealousy issues, who talks to other people (in a romantic sense) and mentally abuses him. Yet, he stays with her. It’s been my assumption that the person in question (lets call him, “Rob”) enjoys being miserable. Every time you speak to this person, there is negativity and pessimism. Conflict arises frequently about this person’s behavior and his relationships with those close to him. Obviously, it will arise again, and I am not sure as to how to deal with it.

HOW CAN THIS CONFLICT BE MANAGED (RESOLVED) NOW & IN THE FUTURE ???

       Also consider:  Is the writer of the case study experiencing any “perception barriers”?

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  b  ●From writer’s  perspective, what is the Level/Type of this relationship:_ SYMMETRIC _____      

   Writer’s  label  for the type of conflict as Psuedo, Simple,  or Ego: _ SIMPLE___            

   Writer’s  label  for the conflict as constructive or destructive: _     DESTRUCTIVE                    

   Writer’s highest score for personal Conflict Style: “Identifying your Conflict Management Style”- pp. 232-3 

       AVOIDING    /     COMPETING   /     ACCOMMODATING   /     COMPROMISING    /      COLLABORATING _4_

     Summary of the problem/ the writer’s analysis/ the goals:

 

  I had a conflict with one of my friends few months ago.  It was simple conflict because it came from different ideas, definitions, perceptions, and goals.  We were just too different.   Our way of looking at life, our goals, and our ideas were totally different from each other.  I don’t agree when someone says that opposite attracts.  I like to be with someone who has same ideas and goals as me.  I called her up one day to discuss what was going on and then I suggested that we shouldn’t spend time together anymore.  She didn’t know what to do but then she agreed with me.  The reason of conflict wasn’t because we didn’t like each other, but it was because we were arguing over everything.  So I decided that before we start to hate each, we should just stop talking to each other.  I don’t want to hate her or I don’t want her to hate me.  If I was in that situation after reading this chapter I probably would have handled the situation differently.

 

HOW CAN THIS CONFLICT BE MANAGED (RESOLVED) NOW & IN THE FUTURE ???

       Also consider:  Is the writer of the case study experiencing any “perception barriers”?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Team’s C.M. Recommendations [ based on material in Chaps 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 (4e)]: (continue onto back if necessary)

 

4a – First of all work  to understand WHY you are angry at your friend.  ( Dr. Plummer’s annotation: Often our reactions are more about what is going on inside of  us than it is about the friend’s behavior itself) Of course utilize anger defusing techniques such as avoiding personal attacks,  avoiding name calling & emotional overstatements, etc.

 

4a – Take each conflict-inducing situation separately. Describe & Resolve it in an objective way.

 

4b – More EMPATHY & OTHER-ORIENTATION are needed on the part of the author of the case study.

 

4b - Realize some conflicts are unresolvable &separation may be necessary.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


S07-5 FRND {NOTE: names & some details have been changed &/or paraphrased to preserve anonymity}

 

 

 ●From writer’s  perspective, what is the Level/Type of this relationship:_ none given_____     

Writer’s  label  for the type of conflict (Psuedo, Simple,  or Ego): _ none given_          

Writer’s  label  for the conflict (constructive or destructive): _ non given          

Writer’s highest score for personal Conflict Style: “Identifying your Conflict Management Style”- pp. 232-3 

       AVOIDING    /      COMPETING   /     ACCOMMODATING    /    COMPROMISING __   /      COLLABORATING 

  Summary of the problem/ the writer’s analysis/ the goals:

 

 

A recent conflict I had with a friend had to do with St. Patrick’s Day.  My one friend was having a party for St. Patrick’s Day and I told him I would definitely come to his house for the party.  A few days later I found out that one of my other friends was having a party as well and I told her that I would stop by.  I told my one friend who was originally having a party that I was going to go to this girl’s house on St. Patrick’ Day.  My guy friend thought I was not coming to his house at all, so he got upset with me.  In reality it was a misunderstanding and what I meant was that I would only be going to this girl’s house for an hour or two.  After I left her house I would come to my friend’s party for the rest of the night.

            This type of conflict is initially a pseudoconflict—which could be resaolved through “managing the information”. Alternatively,  I also could have used accommodation and just given in to my friend and only gone to his party.  I also could have used avoidance, and gone to the girl’s party and then go on to my friend’s house, where he would realize anyway that we had a misunderstanding.

 

 

 

 

HOW COULD THIS CONFLICT HAVE BEEN MANAGED (RESOLVED) EARLIER/MORE EASILY ??? How can similar conflicts between these 2 people be managed in the future???

Also consider:  are there additional sources/types of conflict and additional CM styles operating here?—i.e.

What are the advantages & disadvantages for each of these 3 possible resolutions. Considering the writer’s IMPLIED perspectives, scores & rankings which resolution is likely the” best”?

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Team’s C.M. Recommendations [ based on material in Chaps 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 (4e)]: (continue onto back if necessary)

 

● Both friends should paraphrase each other utterances to avoid confusion.

 

● The guy friend ( throwing the party)  should be more supportive instead of being defensive,

 

● The guy friend needs to manage his emotions better in order to approach conflicts in ways that aew more level headed & mature.

 

● Because this  misunderstanding  was so easily &  obviously avoidable,  the team & Dr. Plummer surmised that something else might be going on beneath the surface: There is a power struggle  going on between the 2 friends which they need to address & discuss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


S07-6 C-Frnd/Rom {NOTE: names & some details have been changed &/or paraphrased to preserve anonymity}

 

 

●From writer’s  perspective, what is the Level/Type of this relationship:_ ROMANTIC/SYMMETRIC _____     

Writer’s  label  for the type of conflict (Psuedo, Simple,  or Ego): _ SIMPLE               

Writer’s  label  for the conflict as (constructive or destructive): _ DESTRUCTIVE          

Writer’s highest score for personal Conflict Style: “Identifying your Conflict Management Style”- pp. 232-3 

       AVOIDING    /      COMPETING   /     ACCOMMODATING    /     COMPROMISING _4_   /    COLLABORATING _3_

 

  Summary of the problem/ the writer’s analysis/ the goals:

     My conflict involves my girlfriend and me. We have been going out for five years, and we have a

pretty strong relationship. A recent conflict involves a conversation about going to the mall. She asked me to go to the mall with her to buy some clothes. I said okay, but did not really want to go. Already in a bad mood, from other things going on, I went to the mall with her. We went to a few stores, and I was bored, and did not feel like being there. She realized this and became angry with me. I then started to get mad too. We yelled at each other for a little bit.

        I handled the conflict improperly, using the competition conflict management style. I stressed

winning a conflict at the expense of my girlfriend. I was negative in my mood, which led to a negative

encounter with her. The conflict escalated as time went on.

 

HOW CAN THIS CONFLICT BE MANAGED (RESOLVED) NOW ???

How can similar conflicts between these 2 people be managed in the future???

    Also consider:  are there additional sources/types of conflict and additional CM styles operating here?

                 Also consider:  Do you notice something that seems strange about the writer’s listed  scores & the actual behaviors in the situation How do you explain this disparity?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Team’s  (“Senioritis”) C.M. Recommendations [ based on material in Chaps 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 (4e)]: (continue onto back if necessary)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

● Realize that this is destructive conflict.

 

 

● Note where your respective goals overlap ( whatever their individual motives,  both decided to go to the mall & have a good time ) & where they diverge ( the boyfriend didn’t really want to go & the girlfriend really did – which is where the conflict arose )

 

 

● Realize that the aggressive communication styles led to Competitive conflict styles .  Another aspect of the communication problem was “deception by omission”

 

 

● Compromise:  Now & in the future, be honest from the start / Also, control anger: talk to her calmly.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


S07-7 rom {NOTE: names & some details have been changed &/or paraphrased to preserve anonymity}

 

 

●From writer’s  perspective, what is the Level/Type of this relationship:_ CHOICE_____     

Writer’s  label  for the type of conflict (Psuedo, Simple, or Ego): _  SIMPLE_          

Writer’s  label  for the conflict (constructive or destructive): _ DESTRUCTIVE          

Writer’s highest score for personal Conflict Style: “Identifying your Conflict Management Style”- pp. 232-3 

       AVOIDING    /      COMPETING   /     ACCOMMODATING _4_   /     COMPROMISING    /     COLLABORATING - 3

 

  Summary of the problem/ the writer’s analysis/ the goals:

 

        Last August I went on a cruise with my ex-girlfriend.  Everything started off great, we were happy and having fun.  After two days of being with each other 24 hours a day, I started to notice that things were not going as well as they were before.  We started having little arguments about lots of small insignificant things.  Being a very easy going and laid back person, I mostly let all of those arguments just “roll off of my back” and tried to have a good time on my vacation.  As we were getting to the first island, we were trying to figure out which of the many activities we were going to do once we got there.  Of course, we had different views and she did not even want to hear what I wanted to do when we got to the island.  This forceful attitude really got me mad but since I am known for avoiding conflict and being very accommodating to others I decided not to make a big deal about it because I was on vacation and did not want to fight.  I think that was the turning point in my relationship with her and is probably why we are not together anymore (I just hate to be bossed around).  I think this was a simple conflict because we had different goals and ideas when it came to what we were going to do and where our relationship was going.  I am sure that lots of things could have been done differently to resolve this and all of our other conflicts but that relationship was just doomed.  I know that I could have talked about my feelings towards her bossiness and I could have tried harder to try to make the relationship work for her but I do not think we were as compatible as we once were.

 

 

 

 

HOW COULD THIS CONFLICT HAVE BEEN MANAGED (RESOLVED) EARLIER/MORE EASILY ??? [If they had stayed together}How should similar conflicts between these 2 people have been managed in the future???

Also consider:  are there additional sources/types of conflict and additional CM styles operating here?— are there any “real” advantages to the AVOIDANCE style?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Team’s C.M. Recommendations [ based on material in Chaps 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 (4e)]: (continue onto back if necessary)

 

 He should have voiced his opinion sooner. ( Avoiding conflict doesn’t make it go away. Also, if you have “taught” her to expect that you will accommodate & go along, it stands to reason that she would make the relationship more complimentary by being bossy) .--Dr. Plummer’s annotatioan)

● They could have talked & found an activity they both enjoyed  

 

● She should give up some of the control ( that he has given her- ) & be more understanding, Put herself in his place & try to to dominate.

 

● It this was a problem it should have been worked out before the trip.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


S05-8* wk2 {NOTE: names & some details have been changed &/or paraphrased to preserve anonymity}

This is a special 2-part case study opportunity for individuals, only. If interested in submitting for extra credit, you should apply all the same chapters & the same principles of Conflict Management for each of these cases as well as devise some “universal” or synthesized insights on interpersonal dynamics in the (western culture) workplace.

Case #1:  “Negotiating workplace landmines”

●From writer’s  perspective, what is the Level/Type of this relationship:_ ACQUAINTANCE/EMPLOYER_____     

Writer’s  label  for the type of conflict (Psuedo, Simple, or Ego): _ EGO_          

Writer’s  label  for the conflict (constructive or destructive): _ DESTRUCTIVE          

Writer’s highest score for personal Conflict Style: “Identifying your Conflict Management Style”- pp. 232-3 

       AVOIDING    /      COMPETING_3_   /     ACCOMMODATING    /     COMPROMISING    /     COLLABORATING _4_  Summary of the problem/ the writer’s analysis/ the goals:

    At the studio where I work, my boss and I had a conflict because I was reprimanded for being late to work. This conflict was originally a pseudo conflict; however as time passed, it became an ego conflict. I felt personally attacked because she knew it was snowing and I was coming from New Jersey (she thought I was late on purpose).  The trains were late and I did my best to get all the way out to Long Island on time.  Similarly, she felt personally attacked because I expressed my situation to her in an abrupt manner. I did not manage the situation well; however, the next week I was on time to work and I apologized about my tone, not for being late.  She accepted my apology and then apologized for accusing me about being late on purpose. I could have called and explained my situation about the trains, or I could have identified the problem and then immediately proposed a solution.  I could have listened better when she was telling me about time management, and leaving early when I had somewhere to be, instead of getting defensive.  I also could have put myself in her position as an employer, who had customers to please, and been empathetic toward her situation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Case #2  “Negotiating workplace landmines”

●From writer’s  perspective, what is the Level/Type of this relationship:_ WORKPLACE / ROLE RELATIONSHIP     

Writer’s  label  for the type of conflict (Psuedo, Simple, or Ego): _  SIMPLE_          

Writer’s  label  for the conflict (constructive or destructive): _ CONSTRUCTIVE          

Writer’s highest score for personal Conflict Style: “Identifying your Conflict Management Style”- pp. 232-3 

       AVOIDING    /      COMPETING   /     ACCOMMODATING    /     COMPROMISING    /     COLLABORATING _4_

  Summary of the problem/ the writer’s analysis/ the goals:

This summer I was given the opportunity to work at a plant that manufactures brakes for commercial trucks called Jacobs Vehicle Systems. I was able to obtain this position at Jake Brakes because my Uncle was an employee and they needed summer help. My employment required me to be responsible to maintain a good reputation for myself and my Uncle (who had gotten me the job) because if I did anything wrong it could affect how others viewed him. So during my employment I worked hard first, in order to maintain our reputation and secondly, because of the excellent pay.

          The conflict arose when another summer employee and I were working hard one day and completing every task that our manager John gave us. We thought we were doing a fine job and John, even stated that he was proud of us. But then an older employee (we’ll call him Bill) came up to us and told us to slow down our pace and stop doing so much work. We were stunned by his comment because why would he tell us to stop working hard. We did not comply with his request and then he yelled at us along with other people in that department and again stated that we should stop doing so much work.

I became mad, confused and frustrated because I did not know who to side with. I want to get the task completed because I wanted to make John pleased by my work. But I also did not want to mess up any relationships with the other workers because they were the ones who assisted me if I had any problems.  They also had the power to influence John because of how long they had been employed there, so if they wanted to make up lies about me they could and the John would be influenced by it.

I handled this conflict by compromising with the workers’ demand. I slowed down my work pace but only enough so that I could complete tasks so that the other employees would not become angry at me.  I later found out that Bill told us to stop working so fast because everyone in that department was older and did not like to work at a fast pace. They stated to us that by doing so much work the managers would expect more from them and this would make them look bad. They also stated by working so fast it prevent them from  receiving the overtime that they wanted.   I felt stuck in between the interests of John and my Uncle and the interests of the other workers who had families to support.      

 

                                                                                               

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Your  C.M. Recommendations [ based on material in Chaps 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 (4e)]: (continue onto back if necessary)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


TEAM ANALYSIS activity #2

<Conflict & Relationships>

 

 

1st:  Analyze the situation in the case study via this 4 step process:

-         using the original write-up

-         using applicable items from  pp. 223-236 (some of these items have already been broached on  the case study sheet.)

-         using applicable items studied previously this semester such as perception, culture

-         using the  “relationship challenges/dark sides”  from pp. 316-333

 

 

 

2nd:  Determine where the parties’ goals overlap & where they diverge.

 

 

 

3rd:   consider the parties’ respective conflict management styles .

 

 

 

4th:  as a team, make specific recommendations about…

 

Ø         How the parties can/should handle emotions (p.240-243)

 

Ø         How the parties can/should manage information (p.243-5)

Ø         How the parties  can/should be “other-oriented” ( p.242 & 245-6)

Ø         How the parties  can/should use negotiation strategies(p.237-9)

 

 

 

 

 

5th:  submit all worksheets & notes

 

 

 

Team’s  C.M. Recommendations [ based on Chap 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 (4e)]: (continue onto back if necessary)

 

 

Case = _________________________________________________ Team = ___________________________________________

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Conflict & Relationships – the Debrief activity #3

 

Pre-session:

        As a team, look at my Annotations &/or summaries to your  recommendations page.

          If I were sitting in on  your debrief  sessions, these are the questions 

          I would ask &/or  emphases I would add.

 

Step one:

        In no more than 5 minutes, as a team, orally summarize your  case & your

           reasoning to  the  other team(s)

 

          Things to highlight: 

Ø       key items in the case study that particularly influenced your analysis &

­      recommendations [ e.g. presence of anger, personal CM style, level of relationship. Power dimensions]

Ø      key Chapter 8 concepts that are particularly relevant to this case   [ e,g, simple conflict

       vs ego conflict, assertive vs aggressive]

Ø        your 3-4 specific recommendations with a brief rationale for each  [ e.g. if you

       recommend a  “ mutually acceptable location” – explain that’s because the competitive symmetrical tendencies in the relationship

         would benefit from neutral ground which may diffuse the  evident power struggles ]

 

 

 

Step two: the other team should listen critically  &  evaluate the quality of

         the  recommendations that you hear. Play “devil’s advocate” . challenge a

          ny recommendation  that does not seem to be based on the Interpersonal

     Toolbox that we have been  developing over the course of the semester.

 

Step three: of the  2-3 cases you’ve just summarized, which one would the

        class-as-a-whole  learn the most from?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

HOW CAN THIS CONFLICT BE MANAGED (RESOLVED) NOW ???

Note: Don’t focus on the ways the writer could have avoided having to miss the party (that’s rather obvious) ;

 just work on resolving the current conflict ( which is no longer “simple” ). Also consider:  are there additional

sources/types of conflict and additional CM styles operating here?