Example 7.2.10: Application of the Trapezoid Rule
Why these ads ...
 
 
Compare the numeric approximations to the integral 
 
    sin(x) cos(x) dx
 sin(x) cos(x) dx 
 
obtained by using (a) a left Riemann sum and (b) the Trapezoid Rule, using 
a partition of size 5 and of size 100. 
 

Back
  
 
 
First, let's determine the exact value of the integral by substitution. Let 
 
 
   u = sin(x) so that
 
   du/dx = cos(x) or du = cos(x) dx 
 
 
Then 
 
 
    sin(x) cos(x) dx =
 sin(x) cos(x) dx = 
    u du =
 u du = 
      
   = 1/2 (sin2(1) - sin2(0)) = 0.5(0.7080734183 - 0) = 0.3540367092 
 
 
 
 
| To find the left Riemann sum, we let f(x) = sin(x) cos(x) and compute:  
   f(0) = 0and thereforef(0.2) = 0.1947091712
 f(0.4) = 0.3586780454
 f(0.6) = 0.4660195430
 f(0.8) = 0.4997868015
 
 |  | 
 
 
 
 
R(P, f) = 1/5*(f(0) + f(0.2) + f(0.4) + f(0.6) + f(0.8)) = 
      
   = 0.2 * 1.519193562 = 0.3038387122 
 
 
The error between the approximate and exact value is about 0.05, or 14%. To estimate  
the error using the trapezoid rule, we compute  
f''(x) = -4 sin(x) cos(x) so that 
K = 4. Then  
 
 
   |R| < 4/12 * 1 * 0.22 =  0.04 / 3 = 0.013 
 
 
so that even the theoretically worst error is a lot better (less than 4%). To find  
the value using the trapezoid rule, we need to evaluate 
f at the same  
values as before and also compute 
f(1) = 0.4546487134. Then the  
trapezoid rule, combining these numbers a little different than the left  
Riemann sum, gives: 
 
 
   [1/2 f(0) + f(0.2) + f(0.4) + f(0.6) + f(0.8) + 1/2 f(1)] * 0.2 = 
      
   = [0 + 1.519193562 + 0.5 * 0.4546487134 ] * 0.2 = 
      
   = 0.3493035838 
 
 
which is indeed much closer than our previous approximation (the error is only about 
1%).  
 
 
 
|  | Incidentally, if we increased the size of the partition to 100, the error 
committed by the trapezoid rule would already be less than  
1/3 * 0.012 = 0.00003 or 0.01%, whereas the left  
Riemann sum still has an error of about 0.003, or about 1% (compare the  
value of the applet with the exact value above). |