- last updated 4/3/22  //  Additional updates possible through 4/11 - 6pm

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                      COMMUNICATION  STUDIES:  SENIOR SEMINAR

                                                                                 - COMM 5899---

 

               STUDY PREVIEW SHEET FOR - TEST #1 (aka "3/4 -term")

 

 

                                                                  THIS   IS  A  RANDOM  (& incomplete)  LIST OF ITEMS YOU SHOULD KNOW

 

 

(Test day = W - 4/13/22 12:00pm-2:00pm.[ONLINE ONLY /  ACCESS via Blackboard] See below for TWO advance test questions  &  one extra credit click or scroll down

 

 

 

NOTE --- Remember, this course has two major goals: to examine various factors about Communication Studies--in general, and to understand and carry out your own original Communication Investigative practices--in particular.

 

These goals include the development of an INVESTIGATOR MINDSET -- which is less about ease & convenience in gathering data / and more about achieving grounded validity, reliability, and incremental insight {e.g. There's no glory in telling your readers you chose to use a survey in your investigation mainly because that method is quick and easy to accomplish! Actually, that's a "red flag. " }

 

 It helps to think of the various units that are covered in this course as interrelated and conceptual. This means that knowing specific terms and their definitions is only the beginning of understanding. 

 

As Communication majors in your capstone course,  you should be prepared to synthesize various concepts and apply them to the explanation of human communication behaviors.  You will be expected to utilize your skills of critical thinking & attention to detail.  

 

Be sure to review any feedback you have received on your quizzes 1 & 2 and on your Submissions so far (Lit Review &/or Proposal. This will give you additional insights about whether your writing & explanations are as  explicit as they need to be in order for me to understand what you are saying. 

 

 

               ADVANCE QUESTIONS :

**[These 2 questions are to be completed in advance & submitted in the designated slots within your online Blackboard exam] [in total, they will be worth: 10-18 pts {tbd}]/ 1-2 paragraphs each] { FOR MAXIMUM POINTS, QUALITY ANSWERS MUST BE DETAILED, NON-GENERIC, & INSIGHTFUL. }

 

 

1.   Refer to the chapter excerpt from Frey et al.'s  Chapter 3 --located in the library's  EReserve system. {E-reserve materials are accessible through the BLACKBOARD's "Library Resources"  area which is located in the left side menu on the course BB home page.   Chapter 3: Investigating Communication: An Introduction to Research Methods, Frey, et.al}.  

 

After reading the chapter, in 1-2  paragraphs, discuss their recommendations for this dilemma experienced by all researchers & investigators:  

For most research reports & critical essays, it will be impossible for you (the author)  to mention all existing research studies that have been done in your global area-of-study. What are three(3) of the specific selection criteria that Frey, et al.  recommend that you should use for selecting which sources to include in your final paper's narrative Literature Review section?

 

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

2.  Variations on the In-depth Interview methodology have applications in such diverse research approaches as Oral History / Survey / Ethnography, etc.  The main difference is in the researcher's goal. In reference to these three(3) mentioned methodologies, explain how & why the concept of "interview" has different meanings & applications.

 

 

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

extra credit  (worth 0-6 added points) 

 

3.In the QUIZZES/ASSESSMENTS folder in Blackboard (located in Dr. Plummer's Course Information section) , you will find a copy of an article abstract:

 

"A closer look at first sight: Social relations lens model analysis of personality and interpersonal attraction at zero acquaintance."

 

  > In a clear paragraph-- using full sentences, translate the abstract into more everyday wording, (non scholarly but worthy of a Communication major: professional & non-colloquial). It is hoped that by translating someone else's abstract will help improve your own abstract writing technique.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  CHAPTERS & AREAS OF FOCUS  FOR TEST

 

Two different editions are in use this semester so rather than specifying chapter numbers, the items for this test will be selected conceptually: see  below for a chart of material covered so far.   Although we have addressed material in several of the methodology chapters, only general methodology concepts will be included in this current test:  Remember the 2X2X2+2 approach we used for the chapter discussions which means emphasis will be given to items covered by Chapter presenters 

 

Out of necessity this will be an online test and there are   2   more complex questions  to be completed in advance to be submitted into the online exam on test day (4/13/22) *[questions listed above]* 

 

 

TYPES OF QUESTIONS

 

Questions probably will be a variety of  Fill-in, Terminology definitions, Short answer, & Essay types. Possibly some multiple choice questions.  Be prepared to explain, to analyze, to compare and  to contrast. 

 

 

  HOW TO STUDY

 

I will NOT use the same exact wording as in the books & I expect you to use your own words in your answers. We have covered a great deal of material and it will be difficult to "cram" effectively  at the last minute.  I'd recommend starting now to reread  & outline the chapters.

 

 

     LENGTH OF TEST

 

It is expected that most people will be able to complete the test in 45-55 minutes. However, you will have  a multi-hour access window in Blackboard. 

 

 

MORE HINTS/TIPS FOR PREPARING

 

Review the handouts that have been used for class activities.  They also indicate important concepts/terms from the course that your professor wants to emphasize.   As you review your readings, make use of the chapter preview information as well as the post-chapter term lists & the textbook's glossary. Also, be familiar with such terms/concepts as these listed below. (please note that this list is random,  incomplete, & off the top-of-my-head, but it will get you started. You also have several other ways to determine your Professor's items of emphasis:  online slide shows & online quizzes  & your notes [ let's hope you listened effectively despite the disjointed semester! ]  

 

CHART is in progress & items might be added through 4/11/22 -6pm

 

Variables (all types - especially Independent/Dependent)
Random Sample vs Random Assignment
the different types of Sampling
3 way C.A. ( content analysis vs conversation analysis vs discourse analysis)
Quasi-Experimental vs Pre-Experimental vs Full Fxperiment
Compare/Contrast the major methodologies 
& how you decide which one to use
the broad application of Critical Studies -- especially as evident in current events
all about Ethnography -- as an indication of  basic INVESTIGATIVE structure
Bias: Researcher / Institutional / etc.
RQ vs H
Paradigms (all 3)
Research-as-argument [C-D-W-+]Toulmin
Everyday Ways-of-Knowing vs Formal
 Epistemologies
The micro reveals the macro as applied to all research  methodologies
 Intercoder Reliability 
Representativeness as the goal for all research  methodologies
 Reliability (external  validity)
Internal Validity
Criticism mindsets ( research as advocacy)  
  etc. , etc.
 
   

   In order to print out an old quiz, there us an access protocol listed on the Professor's webpage (left-side column). It MAY (or may not) still work with the current version of Blackboard .

 

  Remember, in general,  eRreserves can be accessed through the library website or through our   Blackboard course (via the "Library Resources" section in left navigation column)

 

 

 


 

 

  some SAMPLE Dr. Plummer-type QUESTIONS  - from the past, from this & other courses

 

Below are samples of test questions that I have used in the past in this course as well as in similar, content-based communication courses. These may or may not pertain to your current textbook, therefore they are not provided as review material.  They are simply cut & pasted items from previous tests, in order to give you an idea of how complex and multifaceted my questions tend to be.

 

Some Sample Objective-type Questions -----

 

 [F.I.]   1. Making precise, systematic, and repetitive observations characterizes methodologies usually associated with the ________ paradigm.

 

 [M.C.]  2. We all use our past experiences & frames of reference in order to help us make assessments about current people and situations. When we use such past information to GENERALIZE/PREDICT a stranger's behavior based on our observance of just one aspect, It is generally referred to as: a) prototyping   b) personally constructing   c) stereotyping   d) scripting  

 

 [M.C.] 3. We use our past experiences & frames of reference in order to help us make assessments about current people and situations. When we use such past information to DEFINE a behavior via a particular person's demonstration of it, we are:  a) prototyping   b) personally constructing   c) stereotyping  d) scripting

 

 [M.C.] 4.  The Grandma Moses clip was shown as an example of Oral History-- a methodology which could also be classified as "Textual Analysis" Considering this, which two of the following statements  are TRUE.  a) Oral Histories = Interviews therefore Oral Histories = Survey research  b) Oral Histories are not considered "test" until the interview is transcribed into a written form.  c)  etc...

 

[T/F]  5.  According to your instructor & the textbook authors, beginning researchers, such as yourself, need to remember that research investigations is cumulative and self correcting and incremental. In other words, this means that every research project should be structured definitively from the start, A good researcher never changes anything once the study gets started. 

 

 

  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *  * * * * * * * * * *

 

Some Sample Short Answer/Essay-type Questions -----

 

[SA] 6. In all the models that are based on Toulmin's approach to argumentation,  it's easy to know what "CLAIM"  means & what "EVIDENCE/DATA"  means. However, exactly what is the role of the "WARRANT"?   [in your own words]

[SA] 7. If you believe in the effects of what we referred to in class as "survey culture",  how might you explain the demise of Rudy Guliani's presidential campaign and the rise of Barack Obama's candidacy? [ dated references  but "survey culture" still exists]

 

[SA]8. "Mirroring" in terms of nonverbal behavior  is connected to the basic human pattern of seeking  similarity. Explain .

 

[ES]  9. Two students (who have an acquaintanceship) pass each other on a campus pathway  and say:

      "Hi! What's up?"-"Nothing much"  and then continue on their way. This interaction can be discussed in a variety of ways (e.g. as a pragmatic language act / as phatic communication / as situational vs developmental relationship  /  as interpersonal communication, , etc.).
From at least 3 perspectives, explain what could have been going on in this encounter and then discuss how you could structure a study to test your hypothesis.

 

[ES]  10. Explain the four basic ways that nonverbal communication channels are used in relation to the words being said.

 

[ES]  11. Once, while I was working in a box office with a female co-worker, a third party approached each of us and asked if we had some": Motrin", "Tylenol", aspirin. etc. When we both told him that we didn't, his response was "What kind of  woman doesn't carry Motrin in her purse?  My next  thought was that the guy was so ignorant. ANALYZE this communication encounter by applying relevant concepts from  PERCEPTION and/or  CULTURE. If conducting a study of this encounter, would it have be better suited to the Critical or the Interpretive, or the Discovery paradigm/ Support your choice.

 

[F.I.]  12. Define "Attribution Process" in reference to the study of human communication. Support your answer by applying it to a specific current event.  How might it also cread research bias-- especially in the Interpretive  or Critical paradigms.

 

[SA]   13.   In all the models that are based on Toulmin's approach to argumentation, it's easy to know what "claim" means & what "evidence/data" means. However, what's the role of the "warrant"?

 

[ES] 16. Would you use an ethnographic approach, a content analysis approach or an Interpretive Rhetorical Criticism approach  to investigate the following Research Question: "What Influence do US/Western cultural norms have on the evolution of the Superbowl broadcast from a sports broadcast to a Social Event?"  Support your choice.

 

[ES]  14. Variations on the In-depth Interview methodology have applications in such diverse research approaches as Oral History / Survey / Ethnography, etc.  The main difference is in the researcher's goal. Explain the 3 differences. (Frey, et al./2e)

 

[adv]  the RealLifeResearch-Yoga Science activity & pod cast: - {document linked here, & might also be posted on Blackboard.}

 Complete the  directions for the worksheet for any ONE (1) of the listed utterances. FYI: Mr. Broad wrote a article-length version of his content analysis-type research which was published online on 1/5/12 & in the NYT print  Sunday magazine on 1/8/12.) Reviewing his study in print might give you a stronger sense of his blend of various philosophies within the DISCOVERY paradigm.

 



page updated 4/3/22


 

  Axioms  vs  Propositions -na this semester