Chapter Outlines for:
Frey, L., Botan, C., & Kreps, G. (1999). Investigating communication: An
introduction to research methods. (2nd ed.) Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Chapter 15: Epilogue: Concluding Research
I. Introduction
A. Research studies are
cyclical: each ends by returning to the issues introduced at the start, ideally
with greater understanding.
1. Reports of research,
thus, follow an “hourglass” shape.
B. This chapter focuses
on the expansive phase that completes the research process; in particular, when
researchers return to broader issues that are at the heart of the concluding the
“so what?” portion of a research project.
C. This chapter is
concerned with the reconceptualization that occurs when researchers rethink the
topic of inquiry as a result of the systematic processes associated with
conceptualization, planning and designing research, using methodologies to
gather data, analyzing the data, and, finally, interpreting research findings.
II. Discussing Research Findings
A. In the final section
of a research article (“Discussion” or Conclusion”), researchers expound on the
findings and place what they found in a larger context.
B. Interpreting the
meaning of research findings
1.
Substantive significance describes
the theoretical and/or practical significance of the findings.
a. Figure 15.1
illustrates the case of statistical vs. practical significance, the question of
whether a research finding can be put to good use.
2. Relating findings to
theory: To describe the larger meaning of the results, researchers often relate
findings to theory, previous research, and expectations, and explain how the
findings may be applied in relevant contexts.
a. Many research studies
are theory-based; attempts to disprove a concise statement that purports to
explain a wide range of human behavior.
b. If the findings from
the theory-based study are consistent with the theory, the validity of that
theory is strengthened.
c. Some researchers
conduct research with the expressed purpose of revising a theory so that it
accounts for a wider range of phenomena.
d. Sometimes researchers
compare two theories that appear to be contradictory or mutually exclusive, and
their findings are used to lend support to one theory or the other.
e. Some communication
research is oriented toward the development of new theories.
3. Relating findings to
previous research: research is a cooperative enterprise; researchers attempt to
interrelate their study with what others have done and, thereby, build on
others’ work.
a. If the results of two
or more studies are consistent, the strength of both studies is bolstered.
b. Comparisons to
findings from other studies can also help researchers to explain their own
findings.
c. When researchers’
results are inconsistent with the studies of others, the discrepancy must be
explained.
4. Relating findings to
expectations: after analyzing the data collected for a study, researchers
occasionally obtain results that are
surprising or contradict their expectations. When that happens, they attempt
to offer an explanation or a rationale that takes these unanticipated findings
into account.
a. In still other cases,
the findings actually run counter to researchers’ expectations and necessitate
some explanation.
b. In the most extreme
case, the results are so startling that they force researchers to completely
reconsider their original expectations.
c. Even if the findings
of a study are as expected and consistent with prior research, more than one
conclusion may be drawn from them; legitimately, the same research findings can
be interpreted differently.
d. Researchers must
consider alternative explanations for their results.
5. Applying findings:
Researchers tend to suggest practical
uses for their findings in the discussion section, and, thereby, explore the
implications that their results may have for how others can operate more
effectively.
a. Ideally, the findings
would be beneficial to all.
b. Ideally, the findings
would be specific to setting, issue, and people.
c. Perhaps the group
that benefits the most from practical suggestions that researchers offer are
practitioners, those who apply the knowledge researchers produce.
d. Much communication
research is directed toward studying the media, and the findings from such
research often lead scholars to make recommendations to those who work in the
media.
e. Many communication
practitioners are involved in various types of communication campaigns, such as
health promotion campaigns, and researchers will assess the relative
effectiveness of these campaigns and suggest modifications in the intervention
programs.
f. Finally,
communication researchers sometimes point out important implications their
findings have for public policy.
6. Identifying
limitations of the research: Researcher discuss the limitations or flaws in
their studies (sometimes a separate subsection, entitled, “Limitations”).
a. Limitations due to
internal validity threats: When research is plagued by the internal validity
threats, little confidence in the conclusions is warranted.
b. Researchers assess
the internal validity of their findings in a number of ways:
i. reporting any
limitations or flaws in the study’s design
ii. revealing problems
or limitations with the methodological procedures researchers used
iii. pointing out
shortcomings in the measurement techniques used to gather data for their study
and how these might potentially limit or jeopardize the findings
iv. explaining the
shortcomings of self-report methods
v. speculating whether
any unobserved or intervening variables may have confounded the results.
7. Limitations due to
external validity threats: Most research is externally limited in some way, so
conscientious researchers identify the context-bound limitations of their
results (people, texts, events).
a. Many internally valid
conclusions drawn from communication studies are not necessarily generalizable.
i. Sampling procedures
involve the way in which the subset of the population is studied and selected.
b. Many communication
researchers do sample from “real-world” populations, but this does not
necessarily solve the problem of acquiring representative samples.
c. Some samples are
better than others.
d. Similar types of
problems occur in the sampling of texts for textual analysis; the
representativeness of the texts selected may be called into question.
i. Analysts work with
relatively unidentified texts in terms of who produced them, which raises
concerns about their representativeness.
e. Sometimes research is
externally limited because of the particular event or point in time studied.
f. Ecological validity
is the extent to which the procedures mirror real-life situations.
i. Ecologically invalid
procedures may lead people to distort their behavior , overemphasizing things
they typically would not do, or suppressing their normal ways of behaving.
g. Replication is based
on researcher awareness that a single study does not “prove” anything; indeed,
many studies need to be conducted before a conclusion can be fully accepted.
Thus, researchers urge that the findings from their study be replicated.
C. In suggesting
directions for further research and that more research needs to be done,
researchers often seek to:
1. advance follow-up
research questions or hypotheses
2. explain new or
refined methodological procedures
3. transfer findings
from laboratory experiments to the “real world”
4. extend the
explanatory range of the findings
5. propose new topics
D. The mission of
research is fulfilled in three essential steps by:
1. making a contribution
to the reservoir of communication knowledge that scholars, professionals, and
the general public can call on to explain, understand, and potentially influence
communication events
2. identifying important
limitations that need to be kept in mind about the research findings
3. raising meaningful
new questions for future communication researchers to pursue; serves a heuristic
function of encouraging future investigation.
III. Conclusion
A. Doing research is a
challenging endeavor.
B. Knowledge is power.
C. Through your own
research efforts, you can discover, and pass along to the generation of students
that will follow you, new information about what now is unknown about
communication. In doing so, you will enrich their lives as countless researchers
have enriched your life.