
2007/2008 SEASON
Preliminary
information sheet - updated
10/5/07
Here is some basic information about our upcoming season - our
47th!! including
our continued performances at
SOPAC
*
<please note: prices, location, performance schedule, and phone
numbers>
The dates for the Theatre in '07-'08 are
as follows:
Oct. 19,20,21,
26,27,28
| *Nov 30, Dec. 1,2, 7,8,9
| *Feb. 29,Mar
1,2, 7,8,9 | *April 18,19,20, 25,26,27
* performances at
SOPAC
{South Orange Performing Arts Center}
*
"The
Crucible"
by
Arthur Miller
{ directed by Professor
James P. McGlone }
F 10/19 , Sa 1O/20 , Su 1O/21
matinee,
F 10/26 , Sa 1O/27, Su 1O/28
matinee
"Nephew
Fred"
by
Chris Aurilio & Peter Donahue
{ directed by Professor Peter Reader }
F 11/30 , Sa 12/1, Su 12/2
matinee,
F 12/7 ,
Sa 12/8 , Su
12/9
matinee,
"Merchant of Venice"
by
Shakespeare
{directed by Professor
James P. McGlone
}
F
2/29
,
Sa
3/1
, Su
3/2
matinee
F
3/7
, Sa
3/8 , Su
3/9
matinee
_"She
Stoops to Conquer"
by Oliver Goldsmith
{ directed by Professor Deirdre Yates }
F 4/18 , Sa
4/19 , Su
4/20
matinee
F 4/25 , Sa
4/26 , Su
4/27
matinee
,
**please
note the details for each venue concerning: prices, location, performance schedule,
and phone numbers**
*
All evening performances begin at
7:30 and matinees are at 2:00.
*
THe Crucible
performs in the
Theatre-in-the-Round in the University Center
on the campus. All other performances take place
in
SOPAC
(South Orange Performing Arts Center, 1
Trenchard Place-behind
the Train Station)
*
Ticket Prices:
$15.00
Regular
$12.00
Senior Citizens,
& Children, & SHU Alumni
$8.00 SHU
Students[One
ticket per ID], Faculty, & Staff
DIRECTOR'S
NOTES -- EXCERPTS:
The Crucible_
- notes
by
Professor
James P. McGlone
Dear Patron:
Arthur Miller's The Crucible was
written at the beginning of the "Cold War." The threat to American Liberty
in 1950, both political and personal, by the Soviet Union, which was
referred to as "the red scare" dominated the new television medium. Miller's
take on the Salem Witch Trials was thought to be a comment on the famous
McCarthy - Army trials that had captured the conscience of the public. It
didn't seem to matter that many pundits noted that the Seventeenth Century
witch-hunt took place in a religious state, while the contemporary American
Republic separated the two powers.
Of
course, the so called McCarthy era seems as distant to some Americans as the
Salem Witch Trials themselves. The play must now stand upon its dramatic
power, a confrontation between a man and his conscience. John Proctor is a
flawed but good man, who has offended his marriage vows and is caught in an
act of revenge that will load further guilt upon his puritan soul. And his
person has been formed by his puritan and English common law heritage. This
titanic confrontation between the hero's appearance to Salem society and his
own perception of his moral guilt is the guts of the piece, and it is
constructed as the perfect storm.
This play, in my judgment, ranks with
O'Neil's Long Day's Journey Into Night, but
it has the added quality of being more accessible to actors and audiences
alike. It takes twenty actors to give us the Crucible's two and a half
hours of stage traffic, while ONeills piece has only five performers for
its nearly four and a half hours of family confrontation. Thus, there is
less strain on both actor and auditor. In any case, we hope that you will be
moved by this powerful contemporary look at one of the formative moments in
American history.
All
the best,
James P. McGlone
Professor of Communication
|
Nephew Fred_______
- notes
by Professor Peter Reader
Director's
Notes:
Charles
Dickens lived in a time when London was an over crowded city with
many social problems. Children often did not live past the age of
14. Dickens wrote A Christmas Carol as a story of
redemption that all Londoners should embrace in the spirit of
Christmas--- a carol of hope. The delightful characters of this
story have become as familiar as "Bah Humbug!". What if the ghosts
did not really appear to Scrooge, but instead were hired actors in a
complex charade and intervention by his only nephew?
Nephew Fred is a play
about "what if, indeed"!. This is the
first staging of this new
comedy by playwrights Peter Donahue and Chris Aurilio. The characters are
the same, but have been imbued with new motivations to change the old
skinflint known as Ebenezer Scrooge. It's been a rare pleasure working
with them to find the humor and quality in a new work, and an even greater
privilege to stage it at SOPAC for your entertainment. |
The Merchant of Venice
- notes
by Professor
James P. McGlone
Dear Patron:
In his
musical adaptation of Shakespeare's Taming of the Shrew, Cole Porter
advised his audience to "Brush Up Your Shakespeare." In recent years, that
advice has been contradicted rather than ignored. The Bard of Stratford on
Avon has been relegated, it would seem, to the dustbin of Dead White
European Males. In that context, it is amusing that his charming romantic
comedy The Merchant of Venice has been attacked as insensitive to diversity,
cruel in its slandering of an America minority.
Of course,
taken on contemporary terms, The Merchant of Venice is blatantly prejudiced
against Jews. Furthermore, it should never be the practice of playmakers to
offend any part of their audience. With that in mind, one must ask the
question: Should Shakespeare's choice of a villain in the sixteenth century
rule out the production of his play in the twentieth century? Do the
virtues of the play outweigh the obvious defects that might offend a
contemporary audience?
The famous
Portia plea for Mercy in the trial scene that begins with "The quality of
mercy is not strained" used to be memorized by students throughout the
English speaking world. It is an eloquent plea for Christian forgiveness.
Ignore that plea, demand only justice and nothing more, suggests Portia, and
you attack the entire ethic of Christendom. In modern terms, we remind our
friends "to be careful what you wish for, you just might get it."
Of course,
Portia makes this speech to save the life of Antonio, the friend her new
found love, Bassanio. The thrust of the play is the wooing and winning of
Portia not the destruction of Shylock. Nonetheless, Shakespeare is such a
master of his craft that he draws out the character of his villain in such
subtle terms that we sympathize with him in his plight. Shylock is caught
in a cultural world he does not understand, and his tormentors, blinded by
their own social assumptions, do not render Justice to him, but only the
law. Taken in that light, The Merchant of Venice might be viewed as a
salutary comment on the contemporary struggle against prejudice.
In any
case, tonight we have endeavored to bring one of Shakespeare's highly
regarded plays to you for your enjoyment and evaluation. We hope to
entertain not offend you. Let our intent be remembered should our craft
fail us. Remember, as Portia has instructed us, that "the quality of Mercy
is not strained. . . "
all the best,
Jim McGlone
All the best,
Jim McGlone
|
__________
= notes by Professor Deirdre Yates
Director's
Notes:
To our audience,
Professor Deirdre Yates
|