

	
	
	
	Group Collaborative Research Project: 
	
	
	Nonverbal Intelligence for the 21st 
	Century:
	
	
	
END PRODUCT + submissions + presentation length + due dates + timing
SAMPLE TOPIC AREAS + specific topics
MEHRABIAN "Side Jobs" {look on the left} to be converted to a question on the Final Exam
	
	Group's  goal:  
	To present, support,  & instruct their classmates 
	about the group's 
	answer to this core question: "What 
	is the most important NV skill (that someone should be able to encode as 
	well as decode) in the contemporary world?" 
	
	
	
	
	
	
	Activity's  
	rationale: 
	 Intensive research into NV as a distinct realm of Communication 
	is relatively recent-- only for the past several decades. This is surprising since NV coding 
	actually constitutes the original means (primal) which humans have used to 
	communicate. This means that, in the contemporary 21st century 
	world, our use of nonverbal communication retains some of its 
	primal/natural/innate origins. However, these days we often need  training or 
	awareness-building in order to fully perceive, understand, & utilize these 
	out-of-awareness nonverbal instincts. 
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	End Product:
	
	a 15-20  
	20-25 
	minute VIRTUAL presentation in which the  
	
	group
	
	► 
	explains the significance of their chosen item
	
	►provides argumentation [ including supporting source citations ] as to why 
	their chosen item  
	
	qualifies as the MOST important NV skill for the 
	21st 
	century
	
	► 
	leads the class through an activity/exercise designed to build that skill.
	
	 (or 
	at the very least, to increase
	
	►
	submits to the professor: 
	< 
	all of these are due for email submission just prior to giving the presentation 
	> 
(1) a presentation outline
	
	
	            
	
	(2) a Bibliography
(3) (as applicable) the slide deck/screen shot of key visuals
	
	
	            
	(4) 
	(if applicable) 
	a copy of any 
	handout being "distributed" to the class 
	 
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
	How to Get to the 
	End Product:
	Each group will figure this out 
	for itself. There will be some class time allotted for groups to meet & plan 
	but  group members will need to be in contact outside of 
	class as well.
	
	
	
Some SAMPLE 21st Century skills: {For time efficiency, consider selecting from this list. These model how the selected topic should be experiential & practical) (However, feel free to use an idea that is not on this list)
>Any of the topics from the "Nonverbal in the News" page
>Experiencing the 
	"Double Bind" :
	Understanding the dynamic of Contradiction: when the Nonverbals
	 conflict/contradict with the 
		verbal message. Knowing how to "read" a company's climate and attitudes 
		to employees through the NV messages sent in the design. 
	
	
	
	
>Can the body lie?: Understanding Neurolinguistic Programming[NLP] & the possibility of detecting a liar; Gender patterns & differences
	>Gender & the Nonverbal:
	Understanding how patterns of NV can differ along lines of gender. Also, 
		how many products and artifacts should be designed
		
	
	
	
>Nonverbal Stereotyping:
		
	Knowing the role that NV plays in 
		perception: especially stereotyping and attribution
	
> Context: high, low, & otherwise: Having the ability to maneuver throughout the higher<->lower context spectrum; Context & (co) culture; Hand Gestures - cross cultural awareness
>TAKEN-F20:Frames, Signs & Semiotics: Knowing how to see the subtle ways these NV codes communicate about how things work, where to go, who's in charge, & how to perform
> Appearance / Attire / Accessories: Exploring Impact vs. Intention; Self Presentation in the Workplace
> picking up on Social/Emotional cues: Metacommunication & more; Emoji as an other alternatives to NV Social-Emotional cues; Metacommunication & relational communication.
>Facial Expressions: Going beyond the gender stereotypes; speech-independent universality isn't always universal
>
	
	
	
	
| F'20 Teams: | |||||
| 
		Mehrabian 
		"Side Jobs" cancelled  | 
		Presentation date | Workshop topic area | Team's advance prep. assignment for the audience Come in with an open mind! | ||
| explain what so many people have gotten wrong about Mehrabian's oft-cited statistic | TEAM WW | 
		 Faith K. Kathleen C. Natalia A. Oluwatomi A.  | 
		DAY 1_(W-11/18) | 
		 Color & Mood  | 
		|
| 
		summarize 
		Mehrabian's findings in your own words  | 
		TEAM XX |  Brian S.
		 Gabby M. Kim S. Kyle W. Sebastian P.  | 
		DAY 1_(W-11/18) | Frames, Signs & Semiotics | |
| devise a better way to represent what Mehrabian discovered [percentage-wise] | TEAM 
		YY | 
		Arundhati J. Carmen John M. Haley B. Justin D.  | 
		DAY 2_(M-11/23) | Selfies | |
| 
		devise 
		a way to illustrate or  demonstrate Mehrabian's other, primary insight [that gets much less attention]  | 
		TEAM ZZ | Alli O Chris. d. Gianna S. Kadeem L. Natalia R. .  | 
		DAY 2_(M-11/23) | First Impressions | |
| 
		
		1st day 2nd day  | 
		--------------------- --------------------- --------------------- ____________  | 
	
*** last updated 11/11/20
	Group Research Project:
	Nonverbal Intelligence for the 21st 
	Century:
Generic Grading Rubric: [developed August 2018].
| 
		 Evaluation Criteria  | 
		
		 Excellent <16-20pt>  | 
		
		 Proficient  <11-15pt>  | 
		
		 Competent <6-10pt>  | 
		
		 Minimal/Unsatisfactory 
		<0-5pt>  | 
	
| 
		 Gives a concrete explanation of team’s 
		selected nonverbal skill & its channel &/or categorization; indicates 
		high level of analytical thinking  | 
		
		 Gives a very understandable explanation of 
		team’s selected nonverbal skill & its channel &/or categorization; 
		includes  analytical thinking   | 
		
		 Gives an explanation of team’s selected 
		nonverbal skill & its channel &/or categorization; is more descriptive 
		than analytical  | 
		
		 Omits or provides only a superficial 
		explanation of team’s selected nonverbal skill & its channel &/or 
		categorization  | 
	|
| 
		 Argumentation & Rationale  [including 
			supporting research source citations]------- 20%  | 
		
		 Gives a clearly structured argument showing 
		why the selected skill qualifies as the MOST important NV skill for the 
		21st century {C-D-W- format preferred} 
		[3-4 source citations included]  | 
		
		 Gives a reasonably structured argument 
		showing why the selected skill qualifies as the MOST important NV skill 
		for the 21st century [2-3 source citations 
		included]  | 
		
		 Gives a minimally   structured argument 
		showing why the selected skill qualifies as the MOST important NV skill 
		for the 21st century [1-2 source citations 
		included]  | 
		
		 Omits or provides only vague logical 
		reasoning underlying the selection of this NV skill [0 – 1 source citations included]   | 
	
| 
		 In-class activity/exercise ------20%  | 
		
		 Conducts an audience-centered & interactive 
		teaching exercise designed to increase skill/awareness in selected item; 
		all team members are poised, well prepared and participate cohesively; 
		audience is handled skillfully & professionally; Activity includes 
		explicit rationale, procedural explanation & debrief  | 
		
		 Conducts a teaching exercise in a thoughtful 
		manner; team members appear reasonably prepared; more so than not, there 
		are indicators of organization and most transitions were easy to follow, 
		but at times ideas were unclear   | 
		
		 Conducts a partially effective teaching 
		exercise; team members somewhat prepared but do not exhibit concrete 
		knowledge or professionalism; activity components, procedural 
		explanation, and debrief not fully clear or tied into the expressed 
		rationale   | 
		
		 Conducts a class activity that does not align 
		with principles of informative communication; data presented is either 
		inaccurate, insufficient and/or does not align with the researched 
		knowledge in that area  | 
	
| 
		 PROJECT OUTCOMES- Hardcopy Submissions 20%   (1) a presentation outline    (2) a Bibliography 
			[APA format]  (3) Slide print 
			out/screen shot of any key visuals – [ 6 slides per page] (4) a copy of any handouts 
			  | 
		
		 All four(4) required items are submitted 
		before the presentation; use specified formats/style sheets; no errors 
		in spelling, grammar, etc.; content is completely accurate; All facts 
		are precise and explicit; utilizes more than enough resources to make 
		project effective  | 
		
		 All four(4) required items are submitted 
		before the presentation and are formatted according to listed 
		specifications; spelling/grammar errors are minimal; content is mostly 
		accurate with only  a few inconsistencies or errors; good breadth of 
		research   | 
		
		 At least items 1 & 2 are submitted before the 
		presentation and are formatted according to listed specifications; 
		content is somewhat accurate but there are more than a few 
		inconsistencies or errors; research breadth is adequate;  and are formatted according to listed 
		specifications; minimal spelling/grammar errors   | 
		
		 Noticeable spelling or grammatical errors; 
		Substantial inaccuracies and/or misleading content;  Did not utilize 
		resources effectively; Content reflects little or no fact gathering on 
		the topic;   | 
	
| 
		 PROJECT OUTCOMES- Oral Presentation-------
   25%  | 
		
		 Team gives a 25-30 minute, cohesive 
		presentation; Organizational format is easy to follow format and 
		strategically  appropriate for selected topic; Eloquent transitions are 
		 used to enhance clarity and flow; Uses the full spectrum of appropriate 
		Oral Communication techniques and principles (including with 
		presentation aids) ; incorporates research that goes “above and beyond” 
		(e.g. includes personal ideas &/or examples, extra sources, 
		self-conducted  research)   | 
		
		 Team gives a 25-30 minute, cohesive 
		presentation; Organizational format is appropriate and mostly easy to 
		follow; displays reasonably  effective presentation techniques and 
		principles (including with presentation aids); uses appropriate research 
		and materials to support project;    | 
		
		 Presentation is noticeably longer or shorter 
		than the specified slot (25-30 min.)- indicating inadequate planning; 
		Somewhat organized; ideas are not always presented cohesively or 
		coherently; Transitions are not always smooth; Presentation aids are 
		adequate but do not reflect “best practices”   | 
		
		 Presentation is noticeably longer or shorter 
		than the specified slot (25-30 min.)- indicating inadequate planning; 
		Overall flow is choppy and/or confusing; Format is difficult to follow; 
		Transitions are abrupt or not used at all; written components are not 
		accurate or coherent  | 
	
| 
		 | 
		
		 | 
		
		 | 
		
		 | 
		
		 | 
	
| 
		 | 
		
		 | 
		
		 | 
		
		 | 
		
		 | 
	
| 
		 | 
		
		 | 
		
		 | 
		
		 | 
		
		 | 
	
| 
		 | 
		
		 Draws an explicit connection between the 
		contemporary communication skills and the selected nonverbal cue  | 
		
		 | 
		
		 | 
		
		 |