Group Collaborative Research Project:
Nonverbal Intelligence for the 21st
Century:
END PRODUCT + submissions + presentation length + due dates + timing
SAMPLE TOPIC AREAS + specific topics
MEHRABIAN "Side Jobs" {look on the left} to be converted to a question on the Final Exam
Group's goal:
To present, support, & instruct their classmates
about the group's
answer to this core question: "What
is the most important NV skill (that someone should be able to encode as
well as decode) in the contemporary world?"
Activity's
rationale:
Intensive research into NV as a distinct realm of Communication
is relatively recent-- only for the past several decades. This is surprising since NV coding
actually constitutes the original means (primal) which humans have used to
communicate. This means that, in the contemporary 21st century
world, our use of nonverbal communication retains some of its
primal/natural/innate origins. However, these days we often need training or
awareness-building in order to fully perceive, understand, & utilize these
out-of-awareness nonverbal instincts.
End Product:
a 15-20
20-25
minute VIRTUAL presentation in which the
group
►
explains the significance of their chosen item
►provides argumentation [ including supporting source citations ] as to why
their chosen item
qualifies as the MOST important NV skill for the
21st
century
►
leads the class through an activity/exercise designed to build that skill.
(or
at the very least, to increase
►
submits to the professor:
<
all of these are due for email submission just prior to giving the presentation
>
(1) a presentation outline
(2) a Bibliography
(3) (as applicable) the slide deck/screen shot of key visuals
(4)
(if applicable)
a copy of any
handout being "distributed" to the class
How to Get to the
End Product:
Each group will figure this out
for itself. There will be some class time allotted for groups to meet & plan
but group members will need to be in contact outside of
class as well.
Some SAMPLE 21st Century skills: {For time efficiency, consider selecting from this list. These model how the selected topic should be experiential & practical) (However, feel free to use an idea that is not on this list)
>Any of the topics from the "Nonverbal in the News" page
>Experiencing the
"Double Bind" :
Understanding the dynamic of Contradiction: when the Nonverbals
conflict/contradict with the
verbal message. Knowing how to "read" a company's climate and attitudes
to employees through the NV messages sent in the design.
>Can the body lie?: Understanding Neurolinguistic Programming[NLP] & the possibility of detecting a liar; Gender patterns & differences
>Gender & the Nonverbal:
Understanding how patterns of NV can differ along lines of gender. Also,
how many products and artifacts should be designed
>Nonverbal Stereotyping:
Knowing the role that NV plays in
perception: especially stereotyping and attribution
> Context: high, low, & otherwise: Having the ability to maneuver throughout the higher<->lower context spectrum; Context & (co) culture; Hand Gestures - cross cultural awareness
>TAKEN-F20:Frames, Signs & Semiotics: Knowing how to see the subtle ways these NV codes communicate about how things work, where to go, who's in charge, & how to perform
> Appearance / Attire / Accessories: Exploring Impact vs. Intention; Self Presentation in the Workplace
> picking up on Social/Emotional cues: Metacommunication & more; Emoji as an other alternatives to NV Social-Emotional cues; Metacommunication & relational communication.
>Facial Expressions: Going beyond the gender stereotypes; speech-independent universality isn't always universal
>
F'20 Teams: | |||||
Mehrabian
"Side Jobs" cancelled |
Presentation date | Workshop topic area | Team's advance prep. assignment for the audience Come in with an open mind! | ||
explain what so many people have gotten wrong about Mehrabian's oft-cited statistic | TEAM WW |
Faith K. Kathleen C. Natalia A. Oluwatomi A. |
DAY 1_(W-11/18) |
Color & Mood |
|
summarize
Mehrabian's findings in your own words |
TEAM XX | Brian S.
Gabby M. Kim S. Kyle W. Sebastian P. |
DAY 1_(W-11/18) | Frames, Signs & Semiotics | |
devise a better way to represent what Mehrabian discovered [percentage-wise] | TEAM
YY |
Arundhati J. Carmen John M. Haley B. Justin D. |
DAY 2_(M-11/23) | Selfies | |
devise
a way to illustrate or demonstrate Mehrabian's other, primary insight [that gets much less attention] |
TEAM ZZ | Alli O Chris. d. Gianna S. Kadeem L. Natalia R. . |
DAY 2_(M-11/23) | First Impressions | |
1st day 2nd day |
--------------------- --------------------- --------------------- ____________ |
*** last updated 11/11/20
Group Research Project:
Nonverbal Intelligence for the 21st
Century:
Generic Grading Rubric: [developed August 2018].
Evaluation Criteria |
Excellent <16-20pt> |
Proficient <11-15pt> |
Competent <6-10pt> |
Minimal/Unsatisfactory
<0-5pt> |
Gives a concrete explanation of team’s
selected nonverbal skill & its channel &/or categorization; indicates
high level of analytical thinking |
Gives a very understandable explanation of
team’s selected nonverbal skill & its channel &/or categorization;
includes analytical thinking |
Gives an explanation of team’s selected
nonverbal skill & its channel &/or categorization; is more descriptive
than analytical |
Omits or provides only a superficial
explanation of team’s selected nonverbal skill & its channel &/or
categorization |
|
Argumentation & Rationale [including
supporting research source citations]------- 20% |
Gives a clearly structured argument showing
why the selected skill qualifies as the MOST important NV skill for the
21st century {C-D-W- format preferred}
[3-4 source citations included] |
Gives a reasonably structured argument
showing why the selected skill qualifies as the MOST important NV skill
for the 21st century [2-3 source citations
included] |
Gives a minimally structured argument
showing why the selected skill qualifies as the MOST important NV skill
for the 21st century [1-2 source citations
included] |
Omits or provides only vague logical
reasoning underlying the selection of this NV skill [0 – 1 source citations included] |
In-class activity/exercise ------20% |
Conducts an audience-centered & interactive
teaching exercise designed to increase skill/awareness in selected item;
all team members are poised, well prepared and participate cohesively;
audience is handled skillfully & professionally; Activity includes
explicit rationale, procedural explanation & debrief |
Conducts a teaching exercise in a thoughtful
manner; team members appear reasonably prepared; more so than not, there
are indicators of organization and most transitions were easy to follow,
but at times ideas were unclear |
Conducts a partially effective teaching
exercise; team members somewhat prepared but do not exhibit concrete
knowledge or professionalism; activity components, procedural
explanation, and debrief not fully clear or tied into the expressed
rationale |
Conducts a class activity that does not align
with principles of informative communication; data presented is either
inaccurate, insufficient and/or does not align with the researched
knowledge in that area |
PROJECT OUTCOMES- Hardcopy Submissions 20% (1) a presentation outline (2) a Bibliography
[APA format] (3) Slide print
out/screen shot of any key visuals – [ 6 slides per page] (4) a copy of any handouts
|
All four(4) required items are submitted
before the presentation; use specified formats/style sheets; no errors
in spelling, grammar, etc.; content is completely accurate; All facts
are precise and explicit; utilizes more than enough resources to make
project effective |
All four(4) required items are submitted
before the presentation and are formatted according to listed
specifications; spelling/grammar errors are minimal; content is mostly
accurate with only a few inconsistencies or errors; good breadth of
research |
At least items 1 & 2 are submitted before the
presentation and are formatted according to listed specifications;
content is somewhat accurate but there are more than a few
inconsistencies or errors; research breadth is adequate; and are formatted according to listed
specifications; minimal spelling/grammar errors |
Noticeable spelling or grammatical errors;
Substantial inaccuracies and/or misleading content; Did not utilize
resources effectively; Content reflects little or no fact gathering on
the topic; |
PROJECT OUTCOMES- Oral Presentation-------
25% |
Team gives a 25-30 minute, cohesive
presentation; Organizational format is easy to follow format and
strategically appropriate for selected topic; Eloquent transitions are
used to enhance clarity and flow; Uses the full spectrum of appropriate
Oral Communication techniques and principles (including with
presentation aids) ; incorporates research that goes “above and beyond”
(e.g. includes personal ideas &/or examples, extra sources,
self-conducted research) |
Team gives a 25-30 minute, cohesive
presentation; Organizational format is appropriate and mostly easy to
follow; displays reasonably effective presentation techniques and
principles (including with presentation aids); uses appropriate research
and materials to support project; |
Presentation is noticeably longer or shorter
than the specified slot (25-30 min.)- indicating inadequate planning;
Somewhat organized; ideas are not always presented cohesively or
coherently; Transitions are not always smooth; Presentation aids are
adequate but do not reflect “best practices” |
Presentation is noticeably longer or shorter
than the specified slot (25-30 min.)- indicating inadequate planning;
Overall flow is choppy and/or confusing; Format is difficult to follow;
Transitions are abrupt or not used at all; written components are not
accurate or coherent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Draws an explicit connection between the
contemporary communication skills and the selected nonverbal cue |
|
|
|