CONFLICT MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP - v.3 (film clip analysis+ mini-presentations) 

W.I.G.4/5e

LAST UPDATED 11/30/11

   
 Rationale:
Conflict  is  Good!

►In other words: Conflict in groups is inevitable but if managed appropriately, it actually can lead to better decisions/solutions and  better interpersonal relations. This occurs because the conflict forces the groups members  to acknowledge what isn't working -- on whatever level [ideological / procedural / ego-based[affective]  .

 

►Every person tends to display his/her own individual style of dealing with conflict. However, on the group level there are other, broader approaches that help the group to do what is best for it as a whole.

 

►This workshop activity will give you an opportunity to view some moments of group conflict & group conflict management - in action and  then match what you see with the principles &  techniques covered in your text & the online slideshow .

   
Procedure: ●step 1 /  View film clips depicting interpersonal conflict within an ongoing group  ( done in class)
 
●step 2 /  With your mini-team mates, analyze what you have seen by comparing & matching it to the material in:
             > Chapter 9 [5e] (Chapter 7-4e)
             > the Conflict Resolution slide shows
                     - in class: Approaches to Conflict Management
                     - in Blackboard: Integrative Conflict Resolution skills  [self reflection , seeing the other persons perspective, using refocusing questions , paraphrasing , reciprocity]
 ( if possible,  portions from both SldeShws to be viewed in class  or  [if necessary])  on your own: out-of-class
>
 ●step 3 /  As a mini-team, present
*  your insights & findings to the rest of the class in a 5 minute, "debrief" presentation.  ( in class) 

 *RECOMMENDED FORMAT:  SUMMARIZE miniteam INSIGHTS VIA POWERPOINT: 1-2 slides, max - this will save time & make your insights clearer to your classmates>  Note: For these, step 3 presentations,  each mini-team will have only 5 minutes to present its findings (i.e. the the "de-brief" of their analysis )
   
Groupings/Assignments:   go to directly to section AA     /    go to directly to section CC
   
S e c t i o n      AA:  team analysis = 11/30/11, 12/5/11,  12/7/11, (12/9?)
 mini- presentations =  (12/9?) & 12/12/11  12/9 is "swing day" to be adjusted as needed
   
 
Twelve-Angry-Men Teams: >
 

 

  • sub-team1: Cite the specific events/behaviors in the film clip that constitute  examples of Constructive Conflict  &  Destructive Conflict  [via table 9.1, p.215=5e // fig 7.2, p.177 = 4e]        { Mike I. & Yolesda M.  }
 
  • sub-team2: Analyze the Individual Conflict Management Style of three(3) persons in the film clip.  Find an "AVOIDER"   /  a COMPETITOR"  /  a COLLABORATOR ( or "COMPROMISER")  [via  pp. 216-219=5e  //  pp.178-182 = 4e]  {Joe D. } <use the other sub-team members  as "sounding boards">
 
  •  sub-teams3a&b: Determine which Group Conflict Management Method ( ICR slide show &/or pp. 220-224= 5e // pp. 183-187= 4e) most closely matches what you actually saw being used in the film clip. Explain. Also, determine which Cohesion principles were evident  [pp. 225-226 =5e   // pp. 188-189= 4e]    { Ryan O. & Kevin M.  }
 
  Some-Kind-of-monster Teams:   >
 
  • sub-team1: Cite the specific events/behaviors in the film clip that constitute examples of Constructive &  Destructive Conflict   [via table 9.1, p.215=5e // fig 7.2, p.177 = 4e]       { Evan N. & Joe F.  }
 
  • sub-team2: Analyze the Individual Conflict Management Style of three(3) persons in the film clip.  Find an "AVOIDER"   /  a COMPETITOR"  /  a COLLABORATOR ( or "COMPROMISER") [via  pp. 216-219=5e  //  pp.178-182 = 4e]  { Antonio L. & Taahir L.  }
 
  • sub-teams3a&b: Determine which Group Conflict Management Method (ICR slide show &/or pp. 220-224= 5e // pp. 183-187= 4e) most closely matches what you actually saw used in the film clip. Explain. Also, determine which Cohesion principles were evident  [pp. 225-226  // pp. 188-189= 4e]   {Matt H. & Mark P. - if necessary:  <use the other sub-team members  as "sounding boards">   }


Twelve-Angry-Men  clip  = ----- from beginning of tape fast forward to  0:48:00  then view through to  --->  1:00:56 [change vote / what are the " facts" / new vote / recreating the old man's walk/ you're a sadist!] I'll...]


On DVD = Chapter 9 {i.e. 0:59:26}


Some-Kind-of-monster clip  =  Chapter 15  {0:48:50} ----> Chapter 16 {0:55:00} [ Kirk (Hammett) paraphrasing James / Lars feels "dissed" / Kirk's interview / Lars previews 1st meeting / should we continue documentary??? ]
\

also interesting = Chapter 33  {1:58:19} ----> Chapter 33 {2:01:40} [ Issues with Phil / Is it time to separate? ]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



 

Today is SUPER - M.A.P. DAY(Weds 12/7 & Fri 12/9)

 

1st half = MiniTeams  TMAP :

12 Angry->{Mike+Yolesda} / {Joe D.+ tbd } / {Ryan+Kevin}

===============================================================================

Metallica->  {Evan + Joe F.}  // {Antonio+Taahir} //           { Matt+Mark}

 

2nd half = Groups GMAP :  LOCK IN TOPICS //  SELECT SLOTS // INFORMAL CONFERENCING w/ PROF

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BELOW = LEFTOVERS . CURRENTLY  N.A. FOR THIS SEMESTER

S e c t i o n    CC		 team analysis = 4/20/05 & 4/25/05  ||  mini debrief presentations 4/25/05 & 4/27/05
   
  Twelve-Angry-Men Team:
 

 

  •   sub-team1: Cite the specific events/behaviors in the film clip that constitute       examples of Constructive &  Destructive Conflict  [via fig 7.2, p.149-3e]]  { Shaun, John, Nicki }
 
  • sub-team2: Analyze the Individual Conflict Management Style of 3 persons in the film clip.  Find an "AVOIDER"   /  a COMPETITOR"  /  a COLLABORATOR ( or "COMPROMISER")  [via pp.149-152-3e]]  {Brian, Quentin, Peter}
 
  •  sub-team3: Determine which Group Conflict Management Method (pp. 154-158-3e]) most closely matches what you actually saw used in the film clip. Explain. Also, determine which Cohesion principles were evident  [pp. 159(top)  & 162-3e]]      {Nikki, Rob E.}
   
  Some-Kind-of-monster Team:
 
  • sub-team1: Cite the specific events/behaviors in the film clip that constitute       examples of Constructive &  Destructive Conflict  [via fig 7.2, p.149-3e]]   {CC,  Adam, Jacob }
 
  • sub-team2: Analyze the Individual Conflict Management Style of 3 persons in the film clip.  Find an "AVOIDER"   /  a COMPETITOR"  /  a COLLABORATOR ( or "COMPROMISER")  [via pp.149-152-3e]]  {James, Geoff, John-Peter}
 
  • sub-team3: Determine which Group Conflict Management Method (pp. 154-158-3e]) most closely matches what you actually saw used in the film clip. Explain. Also, determine which Cohesion principles were evident  [pp. 159(top)  & 162-3e]]          {Sal, Dominick, Amy}
   
   
   
Twelve-Angry-Men  clip  = ----- from beginning of tape fast forward to  0:48:00  then view through to  --->  1:00:56 [change vote / what are the " facts" / new vote / recreating the old man's walk/ you're a sadist!]
   
Some-Kind-of-monster clip  =  Chapter 15  {0:48:50} ----> Chapter 16 {0:55:00} [ Kurt paraphrasing James/Lars feels dissed/ Kurt's interview / Lars previews 1st meeting / should we continue docu??? ]

also interesting = Chapter 33  {1:58:19} ----> Chapter 33 {2:01:40} [ Issues with Philtime to separate? ]

   

W.I.G.4e

last updated 4/27/11