DYNAMICS OF HUMAN COMMUNICATION
-- S' 19 --
THIS IS A RANDOM (& incomplete) LIST OF ITEMS YOU SHOULD KNOW FOR
>>> TEST #2 <<< [Beebe, et al., 8e]
--Final
exam session:
Friday 5/10/19@
12:20am-2:20pm_ in FH:58A
See below [or click] for three required advance test questions {+1bonus} to complete & bring with you
NOTE
{READ THIS FIRST} ---
Remember, this course examines various factors
in operation when people interact. In preparing to study, it helps to think
about the many units throughout the course as interrelated,
conceptual, and
cumulative. This means that you should know specific terms and their definitions, AND ALSO what that item "looks like" in action and in coordination with other human communication dynamics. Also, be prepared to synthesize various course concepts and explicitly apply them to your explanations. As you probably noticed in the feedback you received for Test #1 (Midterm), more points will be given to those answers which are not superficial, and instead, analyze human communication by using concepts from the course to demonstrate insights and a deeper understanding. |
SOME FAQ's:
re: TYPES OF QUESTIONS: |
|
re: PRIMARY CHAPTERS | For the in-class portion of the
test, emphasis will be on Chapters
5 [Listening terms] , 8[Conflict
Mgmt], 9,10,11,12[Family & Relational Interaction] --as well as the notes/activities
relating to these areas. Also see topics in table below.
Also see the grid below of the basic topic areas that have been covered. Also
take note of the now-familiar diagrams/figures
[circumplex, comm.patterns, relational escalation,
systems theory, etc] |
re: LENGTH
|
●
The "pen & paper" portion of
the test should take approx. 65 - 80 minutes |
re: ADDITIONAL GUIDELINES |
|
re: AREAS OF EMPHASIS FOR THIS TEST | Also, be familiar with terms/ concepts that were covered - including, [BUT NOT LIMITED TO] these items listed in chart below: |
re: -- an random & incomplete list of recent topics:
(of course, most of these areas overlap, so any given question can touch on several of these items at the same time.) | ("grayed out" items were in text, but were mentioned only in passing in class.) | |
Your Interpersonal Toolbox [& all the competencies within it] | Relationships (types, levels, dimensions [Trst/Int/Pwr] ,principles, stages, roles) | Co-culture |
Self Disclosure (models, techniques, risks, effects) | Johari Window & Social Penetration model( re: self disclosure; & re: self concept) | Listening ( all types; key terms) |
assertive/aggressive/passive | symmetrical/complementary/parallel | Cohesiveness/Adaptability |
Linguistic Determinism (language = World View) | Types/Sources of Power in Relationships / P - ab 2I | Conflict Management [including sources styles, myths, tips] |
Nonverbal Communication- again (including the various "subchannels") | Affinity Seeking / Immediacy | Systems Theory (in ALL of its many applications to human-communication) |
Family (incl. types; as-a-system, models,homeostasis etc.) | Culture (elements, values, contexts, barriers homeostasis) | Other-Orientation & Empathy |
Language: High/Low Context | word meaning is arbitrary | Self-Fulfilling prophecy - again & the pygmalion effect |
===================================
<a> <b> Consider the clues in the scenario about such factors as: > the cultural "elements" of the setting and > the level/type of relationship between me & the driver of Car#2 and > the various "Dynamics of Human Communication" that you have learned this semester.
In light of these factors & insights, WHAT would have been an appropriate behavior response on my part? and WHY? The Scenario : (these events actually happened)
Not too long
ago, I parked in a (relatively) small parking lot of a "Staples"
store in northern New Jersey. While I was walking toward the
store, a few feet away from me, another car (= Car #1) started to
back out very quickly--but the driver either did not seem to notice or did not care
about me or another car (=
Car #2) that was already proceeding up the lane
toward the exit. When Car #2
blew its horn as a warning, Car #1
nevertheless continued
to back out in front of it anyway.
===================================
<a> Despite the title, this video clip actually touches on many different dynamics of human communication. communication. Name one specific CONCEPT from any part of the clip that you recognize as something covered this semester.
<b> Explain that concept's relevance to human communication and discuss how the clip exemplified &/or applied it. {be specific] <c> Explain (specifically) HOW this concept could affect your future interpersonal communication techniques (i.e. ...How might this new awareness impact your "Interpersonal Toolbox"?)
|
||
**BONUS POINTS:
4.
|
last update: 5/5/19
LEFTOVERS: not used this semester:
p. 188 question # 6 (Beebe, et al. 5e ) [div/ethics/conflict]
Chap 4 [Diversity]
Sympathy vs Empathy ( in Interpersonal Comm.)
Complete p. 277 # 7 3e( via chapter 8 [Confl.Mngmnt]) ) You can tie in factors from other chapters, as well.
p. 117 question # 6 [div/ethics/conflict] 4e
[IF you opt to complete it, This question will be worth 0 - 5 points added to your test score. Just as with the other 3 required adv. ques., it should be completed at home & handed in along with your in-class test] [typed/double-spaced]
p. 310 Critical Thinking Question #3 (Beebe, et al. 6e )
Analyze the excerpt below via referring to at least 3 relevant LANGUAGE principles from Chapter 6. Be sure to be concrete & analytical as you discuss how the church skillfully used language to communicate both explicit & implicit messages.
"St Clement's enjoys the privilege of welcoming many people through its doors. Please be attentive to your personal belongings while you are here." from an actual sign in the hallway of a NYC church |
Of the many video/movie clips that were shown this semester, select the one that gave you the biggest insight into the dynamics of human interaction. (Belated apologies for clips thay had potentially offensive language/content!) Then, complete a, b & c below.
<a> Explain the specific CONCEPT that the clip was being used to
explain/exemplify.
<b> Explain WHY it gave you such an impact.
<c> Explain (specifically) HOW it could affect your future
interpersonal communication technique (i.e. ...How will it add to
your "Interpersonal Toolbox"?)