Proposition:
Perfect Sets are Uncountable
Every non-empty perfect set must be uncountable.
Proof:
If S is perfect, it consists of accumulation points, and
therefore can not be finite. Therefore it is either countable or
uncountable. Suppose S was countable and could be written as
The interval
U1 = (x1 - 1, x1 + 1)
is a neighborhood of x1. Since
x1 must be an accumulation point of S, there
are infinitely many elements of S contained in
U1.
Take one of those elements, say x2 and take a
neighborhood U2 of x2 such that
closure( U2 ) is contained in U1
and x1 is not contained in
closure( U2 ). Again,
x2 is an accumulation point of S, so that
the neighborhood U2 contains infinitely many
elements of S.
Select an element, say x3, and take a neighborhood
U3 of x3 such that
closure( U3 ) is contained in
U2 but
x1 and x2 are not contained
in closure( U3 ) .
Continue in that fashion: we can find sets
Un and points
xn such that:
- closure( Un+1 )
Un
- xj is not contained in Un
for all 0 < j < n
- xn is contained in Un
Now consider the set
- V =
( closure( Un )
S )
Then each set
closure( Un )
S )
is closed and bouned, hence
compact. Also, by construction,
( closure( Un+1 )
S )
(closure( Un)
S ).
Therefore, by the above result, V is not empty. But
which element of S should be contained in V ?
It can not be x1, because
x1 is not contained in
closure( U2 ).
It can not be x2 because
x2 is not in
closure( U3 ),
and so forth.
Hence, none of the elements
{ x1, x2, x3, ... } can be
contained in V. But V is non-empty, so that it must
contain an element not in this list. That means, however, that
S is not countable.
To Theory |
Glossary |
Map
(bgw)