Ratio Test


Consider the series . Then
The ratio test is easier to use than the Root test . However, there are series for which the ratio tests gives no information, but the root test will. In that sense, the ratio test is weaker than the root test . In addition, the ratio test can be proved using the root test, but not visa versa.

Using the lim sup rather than the regular limit has the advantage that we don't have to worry about existence of the limit. However, if the regular limit exists, the lim sup yields the same number. Therefore, we loose nothing by looking at the limit superior.


Example:


Proof:

The proof is very similar to the proof of the root test:

Assume that lim sup | a n+1 / a n | < 1: because of the properties of the limit superior, we know that there exists > 0 and N > 1 such that

Multiplying both sides by a n we obtain Therefore, we also have Repeating this procedure, we get, eventually, that But the terms on the right hand side form a convergent geometric series, indexed using the variable k, where N is some constant integer . Hence, by the comparison test , the series with terms on the left-hand side will converge absolutely.

The proof for the second case if left as an exercise.


Tests | Next Test | Prev. Test | Glossary | Map
(bgw)