Let
be a
sequence of real numbers. The sequence is Cauchy if and only if it
converges to some limit a.
To prove the second, more important statement, we have to prove two parts:
First, assume that the sequence converges to some limit a.
Take any
> 0. There
exists an integer N such that if j > N then
| aj - a | <
/2.
Hence:
| aj - ak |Thus, the sequence is Cauchy.|aj - a | + | a - ak| < 2
/ 2 =
if j, k > N
Second, assume that the sequence is Cauchy (this direction is much harder). Define the set
S = {xSince the sequence is bounded (by part one of the theorem), say by a constant M, we know that every term in the sequence is bigger than -M. Therefore -M is contained in S. Also, every term of the sequence is smaller than M, so that S is bounded by M. Hence, S is a non-empty, bounded subset of the real numbers, and by the least upper bound property it has a well-defined, unique least upper bound. LetR: x < aj for all j except for finitely many}
a = sup(S)We will now show that this a is indeed the limit of the sequence. Take any
| aj - ak | <Then, in particular, we have:/ 2 if j, k > N
| aj - aN + 1 | <or equivalently/ 2 if j > N
-Hence/ 2 < aj - aN + 1 <
/ 2 for j > N
aj > aN + 1 -Thus, aN + 1 -/ 2 for j > N
aIt also follows thataN + 1 -
/ 2
aj < aN + 1 <Thus, aN + 1 </ 2 for j > N
aBut now, combining the last several line, we have that:aN + 1 <
/ 2
|a - aN + 1 | <and together with the above that results in the following:/ 2
| a - aj | < |a - aN + 1 | + | aN + 1 - aj | < 2/ 2 =
for any j > N