When dealing with sequences there are two choices:
- the sequence converges
- the sequence diverges
While we know how to deal with convergent sequences, we don't know much about
divergent sequences. One possibility is to try and extract a convergent
subsequence, as described in the last section. In particular,
Bolzano-Weierstrass' theorem can be useful in case the original sequence was
bounded. However, we often would like to discuss the limit of a sequence
without having to spend much time on investigating convergence, or thinking
about which subsequence to extract. Therefore, we need to broaden our concept
of limits to allow for the possibility of divergent sequences.
- Let
be a sequence of real
numbers. Define
-
Aj = inf{aj , aj + 1 , aj + 2 , ...}
and let c = lim (Aj). Then c is called the limit
inferior of the sequence
.
- Let
be a sequence of real
numbers. Define
-
Bj = sup{aj , aj + 1 , aj + 2 , ...}
and let c = lim (Bj). Then c is called the limit
superior of the sequence
.
- In short, we have:
-
lim inf(aj) = lim(Aj) , where
Aj = inf{aj , aj + 1 , aj + 2 , ...}
-
lim sup(aj) = lim(Bj) , where
Bj = sup{aj , aj + 1 , aj + 2 , ...}
When trying to find lim sup and lim inf for a given sequence, it is best to
find the first few Aj's or Bj's,
respectively, and then to determine the limit of those. If you try to guess the
answer quickly, you might get confused between an ordinary supremum and the
lim sup, or the regular infimum and the lim inf.
Examples:
What is inf, sup, lim inf and lim sup for
?
What is inf, sup, lim inf and lim sup for
?
What is inf, sup, lim inf and lim sup for
While these limits are often somewhat counter-intuitive, they have one very useful
property:
Proposition: Lim inf and Lim sup exist
- lim sup and lim inf always exist (possibly infinite) for any sequence of real numbers.
It is important to try to develop a more intuitive understanding about lim sup and lim inf.
The next results will attempt to make these concepts somewhat more clear.
Proposition: Characterizing lim sup and lim inf
- Let
be an arbitrary
sequence and let
c = lim sup(aj) and
d = lim inf(aj).
Then
- there is a subsequence converging to c
- there is a subsequence converging to d
-
d
lim inf
lim sup
c
for any subsequence
{
}
- If c and d are both finite, then: given any
> 0, there are arbitrary large
j such that
aj > c -
and arbitrary large k such that
ak < d +
A little bit more colloquial, we could say:
- Aj picks out the greatest lower bound for the
truncated sequences {aj}.
Therefore Aj tends to the smallest possible limit of any
convergent subsequence.
- Similarly, Bj picks the smallest upper bound
of the truncated sequences, and hence tends to the greatest possible limit of
any convergent subsequence.
Compare this with a similar statement about supremum and infimum.
Example
If
is the
sequence of all rational numbers in the interval [0, 1], enumerated in any way, find the lim
sup and lim inf of that sequence.
Go Up |
Next Section |
Prev. Section |
Glossary |
Map
(bgw)